Loading…
· Public charity
MCR Health Foundation Inc
The corporation is organized to expand access to affordable quality health care for underserved individuals and communities and to promote fundamental improvement in the health status of the people in Manatee, Sarasota and DeSoto Counties, Florida.
$225k
Granted FY2022
1
Grants
1
Communities
$221k
Largest
01What you fund
01
What you funded, over time
By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).
A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 87% of MCR Health Foundation Inc’s grantee dollars go to organizations outside the IRS cause taxonomy (common for large international and research funders), so a chart would be mostly “unclassified” and misrepresent the portfolio.
02beneath the categories
Past the labels — and the year it shifted
Beneath the NTEE codes, this is what the grant descriptions actually say.
…and in their own words, year by year
2018
medical billsbills tyrentyren starlingcancer
2019
preventcancer
2020
—
2021
medical
2022
—
Words distinctive to each year’s grant purposes (TF-IDF) · event-driven terms in cyan.
03FY2022 · 1 grant
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
$221,476
Median grant
1
States reached
$968k
Total assets
Largest grants
- MCR Health Inc$221,476
02The need
04
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
show:
Your human-services grants (FY19–21, $32k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10% — the area typically sits at 9%. 63% of those dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
03Your edge
repeat funding
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
70%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$435k · 3 repeat orgs$188k to everyone else
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +86% since the first grant, against +26% for the ones you funded once.
3 repeat relationships — 1 still active in FY2022, 2 since wound down.
How the two cohorts compare
Re-uppedFunded once
Organizations
3
29
Total granted
$435k
$188k
Median revenue growth · since first grant
+86%
+26%
Still filing today
67%
38%
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2022, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.
RenewedFirst-time
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
Human ServicesHealthReligionYouth DevelopmentInternationalOther
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- MCManatee County Rural Health Services Inc6× · 2017–2022 · $374k · revenue +82%
- HIHealth Insurance Assistance Inc2× · 2020–2021 · $40k
- UCUnited Community Centers2× · 2018–2020 · $21k · revenue +86%
Funded once
- BDBradenton Dream Center Incgraduatedone grant, 2020 · $16k · revenue +353%
- MCMayo Clinic Floridaone grant, 2017 · $14k
- SCSuncoast Center for Independent Livinggraduatedone grant, 2019 · $12k · revenue +121%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
04Your field
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
1
Miami County Medical Center Inc
To help people through healing, health, and happiness.
Health
2
Jupiter Medical Center Inc
To deliver excellent and compassionate healthcare advancing the well-being of the people we serve.
Health
3
Florida Health Sciences Center Inc
We heal. we teach. we innovate. care for everyone. every day.
Health
4
Miami Children's Health System Inc
To perform the functions of, or to carry out the purposes of nicklaus children's hospital and its affiliated entities.
Health
5
Southeast Volusia Healthcare Corporation
The provision of medical care to the community served through the operation of a 109 bed hospital.
Recreation & Sports
6
Boca Raton Regional Hospital Inc
As part of the baptist health network, the mission of boca raton regional hospital is to improve the health and well-being of individuals, and to promote the sanctity and preservation of life, in the communities we serve. baptist health is…
Health
7
Jacksonville Medical Center Inc
—
8
Tallahassee Memorial Healthcare Inc
Tallahassee memorial healthcare, inc. is a private 772-bed, community healthcare system that provides charitable, compassionate, leading-edge, patient-centered health care.
Health
9
Orlando Health Medical Group Inc
Outpatient and physician support services. provision of specialty physician services, outpatient physician billing services provided on behalf of exempt affiliates.
Health
10
Lakeland Regional Medical Center Inc
Lakeland Regional Health's strategic imperative is to develop as a nationally recognized, fiscally strong and growing collaborative regional health system that improves lives by offering safe, high quality, equitable and affordable…
Health
11
North Florida Medical Centers Inc
To increase access to quality healthcare and improve the overall health of the community.
Health
12
Sun Health Services
Sun health services supports and benefits sun health foundation, sun health senior living, banner health, and other charitable organizations. see schedule o for more information.
Health
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Kids Doc On Wheels and the most unlike its peers is Mcr Health Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network
15 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.
1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
7
Early backer (in before they grew)
13/15
Grantees still filing
10/15
Grew since you first funded
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Other$542,204Human Services$32,000Health$21,000Religion$16,000Youth Development$6,000International$5,000
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds Manatee County Rural Health Services Inc ↗
- Who funds United Community Centers ↗
- Who funds Bradenton Dream Center Inc ↗
- Who funds Suncoast Center for Independent Living ↗
- Who funds American Cancer Society ↗
- Who funds Palmetto Youth Center ↗
- Who funds 50 Shades of Pink Foundation Inc ↗
- Who funds Florida Health Care Association ↗
- Who funds Kids Doc On Wheels Inc ↗
- Who funds Lincoln Memorial Academy ↗
- Who funds Mount Zion Human Services ↗
- Who funds Police Athletic League of Manatee County ↗
- Who funds Southeast High School Sports Booster Club Inc ↗
- Who funds Manatee County Habitat for Humanity ↗
- Who funds Remote Area Medical Volunteer Corp ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
The Community Foundation of Sarasota CoFL17.3× affinity6 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →
Open a dossier: The Community Foundation of Sarasota Co · Manatee Community Foundation Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organisation MCR Health Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
2024
’20’21’22’23’24
- Suncoast Center for Independent Liv — 24% of income from government
- Mcr Health Inc — 7% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
6get no government money at all
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–24
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
05Through Plinth
Through Plinth
Your grantmaking, live and operational
This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: Southeast High School Sports Booster Club Inc.
Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk
Financial management
insufficient risk
Limited financial data in public filings.
Track record & reputation
high risk
2 years of Form 990 filings, no recent filing.
Legal standing
medium risk
US 501(c)(3); EIN 650512250 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.
Governance
Live in Plinth
Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.
Compliance & sanctions
Live in Plinth
OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.
Program capacity
Live in Plinth
Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.
Live · Plinth’s real DD engine
Run the actual assessment on Southeast High School Sports Booster Club Inc, cold from public data.
Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.
Post-award monitoring · continuous checks
- Awaiting reportFinancial stability— Runway not derivable from filings.
- FlagSustained operations— No recent filing on record.
- On trackReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 12% of their budget — diversified.
- Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.
What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.
Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing
Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro
How do I get to MCR Health Foundation Inc?
Find your warmest path to MCR Health Foundation Inc through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.
Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.
More from the funding graph
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars pass through an intermediary
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
Strange bedfellows
the named clusters of US funding
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home
State money flows
the interactive map of money crossing state lines