Skip to content

· Private foundation

McGary Regan Foundation Inc

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$667k
Granted FY2024still arriving
12
Grants FY2024still arriving
3
States reached
$120k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2024.

Education$1.1MHealth$835kScience & Tech$75kHuman Services$60kArts & Culture$11k
02FY2024 · 12 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • $10k–50k4 grants · $105k
  • $50k–250k8 grants · $562k
$60,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$13M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MIDLAND COLLEGE FOUNDATION$120,000
UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS MD ANDERSON CANCER CENTER$70,000
ODESSA COLLEGE FOUNDATION$70,000
ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL$70,000
SHRINERS CHILDREN'S TEXAS$70,000
MIDLAND CHILDREN'S REHAB CENTER$60,000
SCOTTISH RITE FOR CHILDREN$52,030
HOWARD COLLEGE FOUNDATION$50,000
NEW MEXICO JUNIOR COLLEGE$40,000
JOSEPH THOMAS FOUNDATION$30,000
WEST TX REHABILITATION CENTER$24,000
PERMIAN BASIN PETROLEUM MUSEUM LIBRARY & HALL OF FAME$10,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY22–24, $60k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 14%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 14%JOSEPH THOMAS FOUNDATION: $30k → 16%JOSEPH THOMAS FOUNDATION: $15k → 16%JOSEPH THOMAS FOUNDATION: $15k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 6% of McGary Regan Foundation Inc’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address. By recipient address, 79% of the giving stays in TX; by stated purpose, 73%.

McGary Regan Foundation Inclessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

75%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.5M · 14 repeat orgs$507k to everyone else

14 repeat relationships: 3 still active in FY2024, 11 since wound down; 9 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

14
2

Total granted

$1.5M
$60k

Still filing today

21%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 33% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $447k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
EducationHealthHuman ServicesArts & CultureOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MC
    MIDLAND COLLEGE FOUNDATION
    2× · 2023–2024 · $175k · revenue +95%
  • OC
    ODESSA COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC
    2× · 2023–2024 · $130k · revenue +55%
  • JT
    JOSEPH THOMAS FOUNDATION
    3× · 2022–2024 · $60k · revenue +15%

Funded once

  • SF
    SWCID FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2021 · $35k
  • NM
    NEW MEXICO JR COLLEGE FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2023 · $25k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field
05the grantee network

7 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 7 of the 25 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
7/7
Grantees still filing
4/7
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

SHRINERS HOSPITAL FOR CHILDREN: $180,000 · OtherSHRINERS HOSPITAL FOR CHILDRENST JUDES CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL: $180,000 · OtherST JUDES CHILDREN'S HOSPITALMIDLAND COLLEGE: $145,000 · OtherMIDLAND COLLEGEMIDLAND COLLEGE WILLIAMS REGIONAL TECHNICAL TRAINING COLLEGE: $120,000 · OtherMIDLAND COLLEGE WILLIAMS REGIONAL TECHNICAL TRAINING COLLEGENEW MEXICO JR COLLEGE: $115,000 · OtherNEW MEXICO JR COLLEGESCOTTISH RITE FOR CHILDREN DALLAS: $90,000 · OtherSCOTTISH RITE FOR CHILDREN DALLASHOWARD COLLEGE: $90,000 · OtherHOWARD COLLEGEODESSA COLLEGE: $90,000 · OtherODESSA COLLEGEPERMIAN BASIN PETROLEUM MUSEUM: $75,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF TEXAS MD ANDERSON CANCER CENTER: $70,000 · OtherMIDLAND CHILDREN'S REHAB CENTER: $60,000 · OtherMD ANDERSON CANCER CENTER: $59,000 · OtherSCOTTISH RITE FOR CHILDREN: $52,030 · Other+6 more: $214,000 · Other+6 moreMIDLAND COLLEGE FOUNDATION: $175,000 · EducationMIDLAND COLLEGE …ODESSA COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC: $130,000 · EducationODESSA COLLEGE F…SHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDREN: $70,000 · HealthST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $70,000 · HealthJOSEPH THOMAS FOUNDATION: $60,000 · Human ServicesPERMIAN BASIN PETROLEUM MUSEUM LIBRARY AND HALL OF FAME: $10,500 · Arts & Culture
Other$1,540,030Education$305,000Health$140,000Human Services$60,000Arts & Culture$10,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetMIDLAND COLLEGE FOUNDATION: $175,000 over 2y, 1.1% of budgetODESSA COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC: $130,000 over 2y, 2.3% of budgetSHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDREN: $70,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $70,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJOSEPH THOMAS FOUNDATION: $60,000 over 3y, 16% of budgetHOWARD COLLEGE FOUNDATION: $50,000 over 1y, 12% of budgetPERMIAN BASIN PETROLEUM MUSEUM LIBRARY AND HALL OF FAME: $10,500 over 1y, 0.3% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds MIDLAND COLLEGE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds ODESSA COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds SHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDREN ↗
  • Who funds ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC ↗
  • Who funds JOSEPH THOMAS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds HOWARD COLLEGE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds PERMIAN BASIN PETROLEUM MUSEUM LIBRARY AND HALL OF FAME ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a set of overlaps that mostly run through this funder rather than between each other.

Abell-Hanger FoundationTX13.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Abell-Hanger Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization McGary Regan Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from McGary Regan Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%5%11%20%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Shriners Hospitals for Children: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to McGary Regan Foundation Inc?

Find your warmest path to McGary Regan Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 25 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on McGary Regan’s filings →

More from the funding graph