Skip to content

· Private foundation

McDERMONTT FAM CHARITABLE TR

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$208k
Granted FY2024still arriving
16
Grants FY2024still arriving
6
States reached
$35k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2024.

Food & Nutrition$154kHealth$110kHousing & Shelter$94kHuman Services$79kEducation$44kRecreation & Sports$25kInternational$22kAnimals$20kOther$0
02FY2024 · 16 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k6 grants · $28k
  • $10k–50k10 grants · $180k
$15,000
Median grant
6
States reached
$3.9M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CONNECTICUT FOOD PANTRY$35,000
CATHOLIC CHARITIES INC$30,000
SAVE THE CHILDREN$20,000
DAV CHARITABLE SERVICE TRUST$15,000
ST VINCENT DE PAUL OF WATERBURY INC$15,000
DANA FARBER CANCER INSTITUTE$15,000
Individual grant recipient$15,000
NEW HAMPSHIRE FOOD BANK$15,000
AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY$10,000
ALEX'S LEMONADE FOUNDATION$10,000
CROSSROADS HOUSE$8,000
SAFE-NET MINISTRIES$5,000
MY SISTER'S PLACE$5,000
VESTED INTERET K9'S$5,000
WESTMINSTER PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH$2,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–24, $60k) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 47% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.

area typical 8%NEW HAMPSHIRE FOOD BANK: $15k → 7%NEW HAMPSHIRE FOOD BANK: $10k → 7%CATHOLIC CHARITIES INC ARCHDIOCESE OF HARTFORD: $18k → 11%NEW HAMPSHIRE FOOD BANK: $4k → 7%NEW HAMPSHIRE FOOD BANK: $3k → 7%COMMUNITY ACTION PARTNERSHIPS OF STRATFORD COUNTY: $10k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

67%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$367k · 13 repeat orgs$185k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +31% since the first grant, against -63% for those funded once.

13 repeat relationships: 12 still active in FY2024, 1 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

13
15

Total granted

$367k
$145k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+31%
-63%

Still filing today

23%
20%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 81% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $40k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesHealthHousing & ShelterEducationInternationalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc
    4× · 2021–2024 · $60k · revenue +62%
  • NH
    New Hampshire Catholic Charities
    4× · 2020–2024 · $32k · revenue +14%
  • CR
    Cross Roads House Inc
    3× · 2022–2024 · $31k · revenue +31%

Funded once

  • DC
    DUTCHESS COM COLLEGE FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2020 · $20k
  • TA
    TOLLAND ATHLETIC FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2021 · $20k
  • X-
    XAVARIAN -ST MICHAEKS HIGH SCHOOL
    one grant, 2021 · $20k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Mercy Housing & Shelter Corporation

Mercy housing and shelter corporation provides housing assistance and supportive services to persons who are homeless or at risk of becoming homeless. mercy works to empower its clients to become independent, so they may live and work with…

Housing & Shelter
2
New Hampshire Children's Health Foundation
Health
3
Catholic Charities of the Diocese of Fall River Massachusetts Inc

Anchored in faith our mission is to emvrace the dignity of evry individual by fostering empowerment resilience opportunity and hope

—
4
Citizens Inn Inc

The organization's mission is to prevent and end hunger and homelessness by providing integrated services that promote long-term stability, health, and independence. (see schedule o for full description)

Housing & Shelter
5
Maine Children's Home for Little Wanderers

To build and strengthen families and their children, instilling hope for the future and a better quality of life.

—
6
Community Health Resources Inc

CHR's mission is to provide treatment, support, rehabilitation, prevention, and education by a well-trained and dedicated staff of professionals who are committed to recovery. Notably, CHR was the first nonprofit in CT to meet all the…

Health
7
Preble Street

To provide accessible barrier-free services to empower people experiencing problems with homelessness, housing, hunger, and poverty and to advocate for solutions to those problems.

Human Services
8
Southern New Hampshire Health System Inc

Southern New Hampshire Health is dedicated to providing exceptional care that improves the health and well-being of individuals and communities we serve.

Health
9
Pibly Residential Programs Inc

Pibly's mission embraces the belief that the needs of its consumers can be met and their goals can be achieved. pibly strives to expand opportunities for people living with mental health challenges by delivering person centered services…

—
10
New Hampshire Community Loan Fund Inc

Our mission is to provide people and communities, in new hampshire and beyond, with the financial, human, and civic resources they need to be economically secure. we do this by providing loans, capital and technical assistance to borrowers…

—
11
Family Service of Rhode Island Inc

Family service of rhode island's (fsri) mission is to advance equity, opportunity, and hope in our communities. we believe all children and families have limitless potential. but for those growing up surrounded by poverty, family…

Human Services
12
The Brien Center for Mental Health and Substance Abuse Services

The brien center provides a continuum of care for children, adolescents, adults and families living with significant and persistent mental health and substance use disorders. we are guided by the belief that everyone in berkshire county…

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Catholic Charities Inc Archdiocese of Hartford; the most unlike its peers is Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 32 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/9
Grantees still filing
4/9
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CONNECTICUT FOOD PANTRY: $60,000 · OtherCONNECTICUT FOOD PANTRYCATHOLIC CHARITIES INC: $48,000 · OtherCATHOLIC CHARITIES INCDAV CHARITABLE SERVICE TRUST: $45,000 · OtherDAV CHARITABLE SERVICE TRUSTIndividual grant recipient: $25,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientDUTCHESS COM COLLEGE FOUNDATION: $20,000 · OtherTOLLAND ATHLETIC FOUNDATION: $20,000 · OtherXAVARIAN -ST MICHAEKS HIGH SCHOOL: $20,000 · OtherCOMMUNITY ACTION PARTERSHIPS OF STRFFORD COUNTY: $20,000 · OtherALEX'S LEMONADE FOUNDATION: $20,000 · OtherST VINCENT DE PAUL OF WATERBURY INC: $18,000 · Other+15 more: $79,500 · Other+15 moreDana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc: $60,000 · HealthDana-Farber …New Hampshire Catholic Charities: $32,000 · Human ServicesNew Hampshir…CATHOLIC CHARITIES INC ARCHDIOCESE OF HARTFORD: $18,000 · Human ServicesCATHOLIC CHA…COMMUNITY ACTION PARTNERSHIP OF STRAFFORD COUNTY: $10,000 · Human ServicesCOMMUNITY AC…Cross Roads House Inc: $31,000 · Housing & ShelterSave The Children Federation Inc: $20,000 · InternationalMIRACLE LEAGUE OF NORTHERN CT INC: $5,000 · Education
Other$375,500Health$60,000Human Services$60,000Housing & Shelter$31,000International$20,000Education$5,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetDana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc: $60,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetNew Hampshire Catholic Charities: $32,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetCross Roads House Inc: $31,000 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetSave The Children Federation Inc: $20,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCATHOLIC CHARITIES INC ARCHDIOCESE OF HARTFORD: $18,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCOMMUNITY ACTION PARTNERSHIP OF STRAFFORD COUNTY: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFOODSHARE INC: $9,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMIRACLE LEAGUE OF NORTHERN CT INC: $5,000 over 1y, 2.4% of budgetMY SISTERS' PLACE INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc ↗
  • Who funds New Hampshire Catholic Charities ↗
  • Who funds Cross Roads House Inc ↗
  • Who funds Save The Children Federation Inc ↗
  • Who funds CATHOLIC CHARITIES INC ARCHDIOCESE OF HARTFORD ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITY ACTION PARTNERSHIP OF STRAFFORD COUNTY ↗
  • Who funds FOODSHARE INC ↗
  • Who funds MIRACLE LEAGUE OF NORTHERN CT INC ↗
  • Who funds MY SISTERS' PLACE INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Lincoln Financial Foundation IncPA13.1× affinity4 shared granteesties to 5 of 5Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Lincoln Financial Foundation Inc · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization McDERMONTT FAM CHARITABLE TR funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from McDERMONTT FAM CHARITABLE TR. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 30%
  • Catholic Charities Inc Archdiocese of Hartford: 39% of income from government
  • Save the Children Federation Inc: 30% of income from government
  • My Sisters' Place Inc: 26% of income from government
  • Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc: 7% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 32 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on McDERMONTT FAM CHARITABLE TR’s filings →

More from the funding graph