Skip to content

· Private foundation

McCullough Family Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$860k
Granted FY2024still arriving
73
Grants FY2024still arriving
17
States reached
$259k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Education$3.8MReligion$1.2MYouth Development$1.1MPhilanthropy$556kHealth$251kHuman Services$183kAnimals$101kHousing & Shelter$80kOther$0
02FY2024 · 73 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k59 grants · $188k
  • $10k–50k8 grants · $156k
  • $50k–250k5 grants · $256k
  • $250k+1 grant · $259k
$5,000
Median grant
17
States reached
$8.3M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ROCKHURST HIGH SCHOOL$259,000
ST THOMAS MORE$56,000
ROCKHURST UNIVERSITY$50,000
AVILA UNIV ST THERESE SCHOLARSHIP$50,000
CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF NE KANSAS$50,000
CRISTO REY HIGH SCHOOL$50,000
ST PAUL'S OUTREACH$35,000
BENEDICTINE COLLEGE$25,000
DONNELLY COLLEGE$25,000
BISHOP WARD HIGH SCHOOL$25,000
SUPPORT KIDS FOUNDATION$13,100
FARNAN SPIRITUALITY CENTER$13,000
CATHOLIC EDUCATION FUND$10,000
DANCING WITH THE STARS$10,000
MERCY HOME$8,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–24, $110k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 99% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%BOYS TOWN: $1k → 12%WATER BY WOMEN: $5k → 15%BOYS TOWN: $1k → 12%WATER BY WOMEN: $5k → 15%CORNERSTONE OF CARE: $6k → 15%AMERICAN STROKE FOUNDATION: $2k → 5%CORNERSTONE OF CARE: $5k → 15%CORNERSTONE OF CARE: $5k → 15%CORNERSTONE OF CARE: $5k → 15%EPEC GROOMING PROJECT: $3k → 15%CORNERSTONE OF CARE: $5k → 15%CORNERSTONE OF CARE: $5k → 15%CORNERSTONE OF CARE: $5k → 15%PAWSPERTIY: $1k → 15%UPLIFT ORGANIZATION: $750 → 15%HIGH ASPIRATIONS: $1k → 15%DON BOSCO CENTER: $5k → 15%DON BOSCO CENTER: $5k → 15%DON BOSCO CENTER: $5k → 15%DON BOSCO CENTER: $15k → 15%DON BOSCO CENTER: $10k → 15%DON BOSCO CENTER: $5k → 15%HEALING HOUSE: $1k → 15%DON BOSCO CENTER: $5k → 15%DON BOSCO CENTER: $4k → 15%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

ME
NH
MT
MN
IL
WI
NY
MA
SD
IA
IN
PA
CA
UT
CO
NE
MO
KY
VA
MD
AZ
KS
TN
DC
MS
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

94%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$7.1M · 125 repeat orgs$481k to everyone else

125 repeat relationships: 60 still active in FY2024, 65 since wound down; 11 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

125
110

Total granted

$7.1M
$339k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+45%
+49%

Still filing today

38%
32%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 83% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $142k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
AnimalsEducationHuman ServicesHealthPublic BenefitHousing & ShelterOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • BF
    BRIGHT FUTURES FUND
    7× · 2017–2023 · $945k · revenue +627% · 27% of their budget
  • AU
    AVILA UNIVERSITY
    7× · 2017–2024 · $646k · revenue +72%
  • RU
    ROCKHURST UNIVERSITY
    6× · 2017–2024 · $416k · revenue +31%

Funded once

  • CO
    CATHEDRAL OF THE IMMACULATE CONCEPT
    one grant, 2023 · $25k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2018 · $25k
  • CR
    CHRISTO REY
    one grant, 2022 · $25k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Catholic Charities of Kansas City - St Joseph Inc

Helping people move to a better life through hope-filled care, services, and advocacy; calling all those of goodwill to join us

Human Services
2
Spay & Neuter Kansas City D/B/a Pet Resource Center of Kansas City

To decrease pet homelessness, increase pet retention and improve the quality of life for pets through education and supportive services for families in need.

Animals
3
Chain of Hope Kc

Outreach to help animals suffering in the urban core of kansas city.

Animals
4
Kansas Humane Society of Wichita Kansas

The kansas humane society is a community resource for pets and people, dedicated to enhancing the welfare of all companion animals.

Animals
5
Progressive Animal Welfare Society aka Paws

A champion for animals since 1967, PAWS is a nationally recognized leader - rehabilitating injured and orphaned wildlife, sheltering and adopting homeless cats and dogs, and educating people to make a better world for animals and people.

Animals
6
Cultivate Kansas City Inc

Grow food, farms and community in support of a sustainable, healthy and local food system.

Food & Nutrition
7
Kansas Wesleyan University

Kansas wesleyan university is a liberal arts college that promotes and integrates academic excellence, spiritual development, personal well-being, and social responsibility.

Education
8
Kansas Legal Services Inc

Kansas legal services is devoted to helping low income kansans meet their basic needs through the provision of important legal and mediation services.

—
9
The Humane Society for Seattleking County

Seattle humane promotes the human-animal bond by saving and serving pets in need, regardless of age, ability, circumstance or geography.

Animals
10
Animal Care Sanctuary

Animal care sanctuary's lifesaving mission as a no kill organization envisions a community that promotes turning compassion into action for companion animals by: 1.) adopting healthy pet companions into loving homes. 2.) promoting the…

Animals
11
Mercy Health

Mercy Health will provide assistance, support and direction to all of the health care institutions and activities operated and maintained by its Subsidiaries. The mission of Mercy Health in performing these activities shall be to provide a…

—
12
Kansas Farm Bureau

Kansas farm bureau exists to strengthen agriculture and the lives of kansans through advocacy, education, and service.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Food for the Poor Inc; the most unlike its peers is Stymie Canine Cancer Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

87 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 87 of the 248 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
24
Early backer (in before they grew)
85/87
Grantees still filing
67/87
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

ROCKHURST HIGH SCHOOL: $1,110,500 · OtherROCKHURST HIGH SCHOOLST THOMAS MORE: $381,940 · OtherST THOMAS MOREST MICHAELS THE ARCHANGEL HIGH SCH: $368,000 · OtherST MICHAELS THE ARCHANGEL HIGH SCHCRISTO REY KANSAS CITY SISTERS OF CHARI TY OF LEAVENWORTH HIGH SCHOOL: $255,000 · OtherST CHARLES PARISH: $197,500 · OtherBISHOP SULLIVAN CENTER: $165,000 · Other+149 more: $2,354,460 · Other+149 moreBRIGHT FUTURES FUND: $944,500 · EducationBRIGHT FUTURES FUNDAVILA UNIVERSITY: $646,000 · EducationAVILA UNIVERSITYROCKHURST UNIVERSITY: $416,303 · EducationROCKHURST UNIVERSITYBenedictine College: $230,500 · EducationBenedictine College+10 more: $177,500 · Education+10 moreTHE DON BOSCO CENTERS: $54,000 · Human ServicesCORNERSTONES OF CARE: $35,500 · Human ServicesWater By Women: $10,000 · Human ServicesPAWSPERITY INC: $4,000 · Human Services+5 more: $7,700 · Human ServicesWelcome House Inc: $40,000 · HealthTHE GABBY KRAUSE FOUNDATION: $20,500 · HealthAmerican Diabetes Association: $13,200 · HealthPETS FOR LIFE INC: $12,000 · HealthThe Children's Mercy Hospital: $9,500 · Health+2 more: $4,800 · HealthDefenders of Wildlife: $13,000 · AnimalsHUMANE SOCIETY OF GREATER KC: $12,000 · AnimalsKANSAS CITY PET PROJECT: $11,900 · AnimalsTHE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS: $10,000 · AnimalsFARM SANCTUARY INC: $4,800 · AnimalsNATIONAL WILDLIFE FEDERATION: $3,700 · AnimalsPeaceful Valley Donkey Rescue Inc: $3,400 · AnimalsJANE GOODALL INSTITUTE FOR WILDLIFE RESEARCH EDUCATION AND CONSERVATION: $2,900 · Animals+1 more: $1,000 · AnimalsURBAN RANGER CORPS: $25,000 · Housing & ShelterCOMMUNITY LINC: $14,750 · Housing & Shelter+1 more: $1,000 · Housing & ShelterJourney to New Life INC: $20,500 · Public BenefitVETERANS COMMUNITY PROJECT: $3,000 · Public BenefitPAWS FOR PURPLE HEARTS: $1,000 · Public Benefit
Other$4,832,400Education$2,414,803Human Services$111,200Health$100,000Animals$62,700Housing & Shelter$40,750Public Benefit$24,500

Showing the 200 largest grantees by grant value.

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetBRIGHT FUTURES FUND: $944,500 over 7y, 27% of budgetAVILA UNIVERSITY: $646,000 over 7y, 0.9% of budgetROCKHURST UNIVERSITY: $416,303 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetCRISTO REY KANSAS CITY SISTERS OF CHARI TY OF LEAVENWORTH HIGH SCHOOL: $255,000 over 3y, 2.9% of budgetBenedictine College: $230,500 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetOPERATION BREAKTHROUGH INC: $66,000 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetDonnelly College: $58,500 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetTHE DON BOSCO CENTERS: $54,000 over 8y, 0.5% of budgetSeton Center Inc: $47,100 over 8y, 0.6% of budgetWelcome House Inc: $40,000 over 7y, 0.4% of budgetCORNERSTONES OF CARE: $35,500 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetURBAN RANGER CORPS: $25,000 over 6y, 1.0% of budgetTHE GABBY KRAUSE FOUNDATION: $20,500 over 4y, 1.3% of budgetJourney to New Life INC: $20,500 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetKeep The Spark Alive Inc: $16,500 over 5y, 2.9% of budgetFARNAN SPIRITUALITY CENTER: $16,500 over 2y, 4.3% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF DENVER: $16,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetUPPER ROOM KC: $15,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetCOMMUNITY LINC: $14,750 over 5y, 0.4% of budgetAmerican Diabetes Association: $13,200 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetDefenders of Wildlife: $13,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetWORLD WILDLIFE FUND INC: $13,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetPETS FOR LIFE INC: $12,000 over 2y, 7.3% of budgetHUMANE SOCIETY OF GREATER KC: $12,000 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetKANSAS CITY PET PROJECT: $11,900 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetWater By Women: $10,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetTHE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS: $10,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetROSE BROOKS CENTER INC: $10,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetThe Children's Mercy Hospital: $9,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE FUND INCORPORATED: $9,400 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetVITAE FOUNDATION: $9,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetColorado Museum of Natural History: $8,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetELEVATE METRO KC: $8,000 over 2y, 1.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF SAINT MARY INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHOMES FROM THE HEART INC: $5,000 over 1y, 1.6% of budgetKIDSTLC INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCASTLETON RANCH HORSE RESCUE INC: $5,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetTHE CHILDREN'S PLACE INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetFARM SANCTUARY INC: $4,800 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetKANSAS CITY STARTUP FOUNDATION: $4,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetFOUNDATION FOR INCLUSIVE RELIGIOUS EDUCATION INC: $4,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetPAWSPERITY INC: $4,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetDoris Day Animal League: $3,800 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetNATIONAL WILDLIFE FEDERATION: $3,700 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetPeaceful Valley Donkey Rescue Inc: $3,400 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetTHE NATURE CONSERVANCY: $3,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetEASTER SEALS MIDWEST: $3,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetVETERANS COMMUNITY PROJECT: $3,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds BRIGHT FUTURES FUND ↗
  • Who funds AVILA UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds ROCKHURST UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds CRISTO REY KANSAS CITY SISTERS OF CHARI TY OF LEAVENWORTH HIGH SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds Benedictine College ↗
  • Who funds OPERATION BREAKTHROUGH INC ↗
  • Who funds Donnelly College ↗
  • Who funds THE DON BOSCO CENTERS ↗
  • Who funds Seton Center Inc ↗
  • Who funds Welcome House Inc ↗
  • Who funds CORNERSTONES OF CARE ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Greater Kansas City Community FoundationMO74.9× affinity46 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Greater Kansas City Community Foundation · John J Sullivan Jr Foundation John Houlehan & Mark Henke-Trustees · Constance M Cooper Charitable Foundation · The Sherman Family Foundation · United Way of Greater Kansas City Inc · Marion and Henry Bloch Family Foundation · The Sunderland Foundation · The H & R Block Foundation · The McGee Foundation · Health Forward Foundation · The Dehaemers Family Charitable Trust · Ewing Marion Kauffman Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization McCullough Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from McCullough Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 50%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Wounded Warrior Project Inc: 0% of income from government
  • Food for the Poor Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
5get no government money at all
20report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 248 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on McCullough Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph