Skip to content

· Private foundation

Maxwell Family Charitable Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$51k
Granted FY2024still arriving
15
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$32k
Largest
01What it funds
0181% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Religion$264kHuman Services$32kEducation$25kInternational$19kHealth$11kArts & Culture$7kCivil Rights$4kPhilanthropy$3kOther$0
02FY2024 · 15 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k14 grants · $19k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $32k
$1,300
Median grant
1
States reached
$507k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
St Dunstans Episcopal Church$32,200
OU Foundation$4,000
MSNI Inc$3,500
Rotary Club of Bixby$2,500
University of Tulsa$1,500
Daily Family YMCA of Bixby OK$1,500
Little Light House$1,300
Cystic Fibrosis Foundation$1,300
Catholic Charities$1,000
Individual grant recipient$500
Holland Hall$500
Indian Nation Council of B S A$500
NSU Foundation$500
Bixby Historical Society$500
Bixby Educ Endowment Foundation$100
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–18, $1k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%Bixby Community Outreach Center: $1k → 15%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

98%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$390k · 18 repeat orgs$7k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +48% since the first grant, against +23% for those funded once.

18 repeat relationships: 15 still active in FY2024, 3 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

18
6

Total granted

$390k
$7k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+48%
+23%

Still filing today

33%
33%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
EducationHuman ServicesInternationalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • The University of Tulsa
    8× · 2017–2024 · $14k · revenue +8%
  • LITTLE LIGHT HOUSE INC
    8× · 2017–2024 · $11k · revenue +69%
  • CC
    CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF THE ARCHDIOCESE OF OKLAHOMA CITY INC
    7× · 2017–2024 · $8k · revenue +48%

Funded once

  • OF
    OU Foundation - Spirit Fund
    one grant, 2022 · $3k
  • BC
    BIXBY COMMUNITY OUTREACH CENTER
    one grant, 2018 · $1k · revenue +23%
  • LI
    LIGHT IN THE WORLD DEVELMT FOUNDATN
    one grant, 2018 · $1k · revenue -26%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Tulsa Community Service Center Inc

Provide financial and supplement assistance to the tulsa area communities

Human Services
2
The Parent Child Ctr of Tulsa Inc

To prevent child abuse and neglect through education, treatment, and advocacy. the parent child center of tulsa (pcct) has been serving the tulsa community and surrounding areas since 1990. in 2024, pcct served more than 96,000 infants,…

—
3
Masonic Charity Foundation of Oklahoma
Health
4
Pi Beta Phi Foundation of Okc
Philanthropy
5
Operation Lift Up

Operation lift-up exists to assist people who are trapped in a cycle of poverty, who have been exploited by human traffiking or who are disadvantaged and need a boost to use thier natural gifts.

Human Services
6
Oklahoma Children & Youth Coalition

Oklahoma children and youth coalition, inc. was established in 2012 to create programs and projects for children, youth and their families and those who support them. we worect to mental health, social and intellectual development, and…

Health
7
The Children's Hospital Volunteers

Our mission is to improve the lives of children in oklahoma with support focused on the patients and families at the children's hospital. being a patient can be a scary, overwhelming, not-so-fun time--away from home, school, friends and…

—
8
Knights of Columbus Oklahoma State Council

Provide nbsp;assistance nbsp;to nbsp;our nbsp;fellowman nbsp;through nbsp;charitable nbsp;activities nbsp;in nbsp;the nbsp;areas nbsp;of nbsp;church nbsp;community nbsp;family nbsp;youth nbsp;and nbsp;council

—
9
Oklahoma Blood Institute

Oklahoma blood institute's (obi) mission is to be the donor-to-patient lifeline by providing our communities and medical partners security by meeting blood transfusion and health care needs.

Health
10
Oklahoma Partnership for School Readiness Foundation Inc

To improve school readiness outcomes in oklahoma.

Education
11
The Christmas Box International

The christmas box international partners with local, national and international communities and groups to prevent child abuse and to improve the quality of life for children, teens and young adults who have been abused, neglected or are…

Community Improvement
12
Christ Outreach Oklahoma Inc

Evangelistic preaching the good news of the Gospel of Jesus Christ. Missionary and support of missionaries at home and abroad. Praying and counseling with Gods people both at home and in the field. Benevolence to needy.

Religion
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Make-a-Wish Foundation of Oklahoma Inc; the most unlike its peers is Light in the World Develmt Foundatn. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 24 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
5/8
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

ST DUNSTANS EPISCOPAL CHURCH: $262,800 · OtherST DUNSTANS EPISCOPAL CHURCHMSNI Inc: $21,500 · OtherMSNI IncROTARY CLUB OF BIXBY: $17,500 · Other+17 more: $69,640 · Other+17 moreThe University of Tulsa: $13,500 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 · EducationBIXBY COMMUNITY OUTREACH CENTER: $1,200 · Human ServicesLIGHT IN THE WORLD DEVELMT FOUNDATN: $1,000 · International
Other$371,440Education$23,500Human Services$1,200International$1,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetROTARY CLUB OF BIXBY: $17,500 over 7y, 6.3% of budgetThe University of Tulsa: $13,500 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetLITTLE LIGHT HOUSE INC: $10,900 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCATHOLIC CHARITIES OF THE ARCHDIOCESE OF OKLAHOMA CITY INC: $8,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetBIXBY COMMUNITY OUTREACH CENTER: $1,200 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF OKLAHOMA INC: $1,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetLIGHT IN THE WORLD DEVELMT FOUNDATN: $1,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds ROTARY CLUB OF BIXBY ↗
  • Who funds The University of Tulsa ↗
  • Who funds LITTLE LIGHT HOUSE INC ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF THE ARCHDIOCESE OF OKLAHOMA CITY INC ↗
  • Who funds BIXBY COMMUNITY OUTREACH CENTER ↗
  • Who funds MAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF OKLAHOMA INC ↗
  • Who funds LIGHT IN THE WORLD DEVELMT FOUNDATN ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift FundMA4.2× affinity4 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Maxwell Family Charitable Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Maxwell Family Charitable Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 60%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →median 5%
  • The University of Tulsa: 5% of income from government
  • Catholic Charities of the Archdiocese of Oklahoma City Inc: 1% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
6get no government money at all
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 24 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Maxwell Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph