Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Maxine Myers Foundation Inc

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$115k
Granted FY2024still arriving
14
Grants FY2024still arriving
5
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What you fund
0196% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172024.

Human Services$235kEnvironment$130kHousing & Shelter$110kFood & Nutrition$108kEducation$101kReligion$65kHealth$47kYouth Development$45kOther$0
02FY2024 · 14 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k5 grants · $25k
  • $10k–50k9 grants · $90k
$10,000
Median grant
5
States reached
$1.2M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
GREATER BOSTON FOOD BANK$10,000
SOUND RIVERS$10,000
PINE STREET INN$10,000
ARNOLD ARBORETUM OF HARVARD UNIV$10,000
PLANNED PARENTHOOD$10,000
ROSIES PLACE$10,000
ANTI DEFAM LEAGUE$10,000
BOSTON PUBLIC LIBRARY$10,000
COMBINED JEWISH PHILANTHROPIES$10,000
KEHILLATH ISRAEL PRESCHOOL$5,000
Individual grant recipient$5,000
PROJECT BREAD$5,000
BOYS GIRLS CLUB OF BOSTON$5,000
NO KID HUNGRY$5,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $54k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%PINE STREET INN: $20k → 16%PINE STREET INN: $10k → 16%PINE STREET INN: $10k → 16%LIFETOWN: $4k → 16%PINE STREET INN: $10k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

NY
MA
PA
NJ
CA
VA
NC
DC

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

91%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$834k · 23 repeat orgs$80k to everyone else

23 repeat relationships — 13 still active in FY2024, 10 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

23
13

Total granted

$834k
$80k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+27%
+77%

Still filing today

35%
38%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesHousing & ShelterHealthArts & CultureEducationCommunity ImprovementOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • PINE STREET INN INC
    4× · 2021–2024 · $50k · revenue +43%
  • SOUND RIVERS INC
    4× · 2021–2024 · $50k · revenue +16%
  • RP
    ROSIE'S PLACE INC
    4× · 2021–2024 · $50k · revenue +27%

Funded once

  • AF
    AMERICAN FRIENDS OF CHABAD OF SLOVA
    one grant, 2018 · $25k
  • SARAH LAWRENCE COLLEGE
    one grant, 2017 · $20k · revenue +14%
  • JF
    JEWISH FEDERATION OF GREATER METRO
    one grant, 2019 · $10k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Jewish Museum

The mission of the jewish museum is to collect, preserve, exhibit and interpret art and jewish culture. see schedule o for more information.

Arts & Culture
2
University of New Haven

The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…

Education
3
National Council of Jewish Women Incorporated

The national council of jewish women is a grassroots nonpartisan organization of volunteers and advocates who strive for social justice by improving the quality of life for women, children and families.

Community Improvement
4
Chelsea Jewish Lifecare Inc

The organization's mission is to manage a continuum of senior care business lines that consistently provide high-quality compassionate care while focusing on the development of innovative programs and services that enable individuals to…

Health
5
Jewish Vocational Service Inc

To empower individuals from diverse communities to find employment and build careers, while partnering with employers to hire, develop, and retain productive workforces.

Employment
6
Boston Architectural College

The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.

7
Jgs Lifecare Corporation

Non-profit organization dedicated to improving the physical, spiritual and emotional health of individuals and families.

Health
8
Jewish Nursing Home of Western Massachusetts Inc

To care for the frail, elderly and infirmed according to jewish traditions.

Human Services
9
Foundation for Jewish Philanthropies Inc

See schedule othe organization is a not-for-profit, public charity established in 1911 to provide for the quality and continuity of jewish life in western new york and around the world through private philanthropy. the foundation seeks,…

Philanthropy
10
Network of Jewish Human Service Agencies Inc

The network is an international membership association of more than 170 non profit human service agencies in the united states, canada and israel. its members provide a full range of human services for the jewish community and beyond,…

Human Services
11
The Jewish Agency for Israel

The jewish agency binds jews across ideologies and civilizations together in a worldwide jewish family with israel at its center. it provides the global framework for aliyah, ensures global jewish safety, strengthens jewish identity and…

12
The Shalom Hartman Institute of North America

The shalom hartman institute (shi) is a leading research and educational center serving israel and world jewry. we work to enrich the moral and spiritual life of israel and the jewish people, deepen the commitment to pluralism and israel's…

International

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is American Society for Yad Vashem Inc and the most unlike its peers is New Israel Fund. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

15 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 15 of the 38 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
15/15
Grantees still filing
11/15
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

JEWISH FAMILY SERVICES — $225,500 · OtherJEWISH FAMILY SERVICESGREATER BOSTON FOOD BANK INC — $50,000 · OtherGREATER BOSTON FOOD BANK INCBOSTON PUBLIC LIBRARY — $50,000 · OtherBOSTON PUBLIC LIBRARYARNOLD ARBORETUM OF HARVARD UNIV — $50,000 · OtherARNOLD ARBORETUM OF HARVARD UNIVBOYS GIRLS CLUB OF BOSTON — $45,000 · OtherBOYS GIRLS CLUB OF BOSTONNANTUCKET CONSERVATION FUND — $30,000 · OtherANTI DEFAM LEAGUE — $30,000 · OtherKEHILLATH ISRAEL PRESCHOOL — $30,000 · OtherAMERICAN FRIENDS OF CHABAD OF SLOVA — $25,000 · Other+20 more — $133,956 · Other+20 moreROSIE'S PLACE INC — $50,000 · Housing & ShelterNHA PROPERTIES INC — $10,000 · Housing & ShelterPINE STREET INN INC — $50,000 · Human ServicesLife Town Inc — $3,540 · Human ServicesSOUND RIVERS INC — $50,000 · EnvironmentPROJECT BREAD-THE WALK FOR HUNGER INC — $45,000 · Food & NutritionPILLAR CARE CONTINUUM — $25,500 · HealthVISION TO LEARN — $1,000 · HealthSARAH LAWRENCE COLLEGE — $20,000 · Education
Other$669,456Housing & Shelter$60,000Human Services$53,540Environment$50,000Food & Nutrition$45,000Health$26,500Education$20,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetGREATER BOSTON FOOD BANK INC — $50,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetPINE STREET INN INC — $50,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetSOUND RIVERS INC — $50,000 over 4y, 2.1% of budgetROSIE'S PLACE INC — $50,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetPROJECT BREAD-THE WALK FOR HUNGER INC — $45,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetPILLAR CARE CONTINUUM — $25,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetSARAH LAWRENCE COLLEGE — $20,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNHA PROPERTIES INC — $10,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetCombined Jewish Philanthropies of Greater Boston Inc — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL COUNCIL OF JEWISH WOMEN ESSEX — $5,500 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetLife Town Inc — $3,540 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetAMERICAN SOCIETY FOR YAD VASHEM INC — $2,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetVISION TO LEARN — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNEW ISRAEL FUND — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMUSEUM OF JEWISH HERITAGE A LIVING MEMORIAL TO THE HOLOCAUST — $750 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds GREATER BOSTON FOOD BANK INC
  • Who funds PINE STREET INN INC
  • Who funds SOUND RIVERS INC
  • Who funds ROSIE'S PLACE INC
  • Who funds PROJECT BREAD-THE WALK FOR HUNGER INC
  • Who funds PILLAR CARE CONTINUUM
  • Who funds SARAH LAWRENCE COLLEGE
  • Who funds NHA PROPERTIES INC
  • Who funds Combined Jewish Philanthropies of Greater Boston Inc
  • Who funds NATIONAL COUNCIL OF JEWISH WOMEN ESSEX
  • Who funds Life Town Inc
  • Who funds AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR YAD VASHEM INC
  • Who funds VISION TO LEARN
  • Who funds NEW ISRAEL FUND
  • Who funds MUSEUM OF JEWISH HERITAGE A LIVING MEMORIAL TO THE HOLOCAUST

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Donor Advised Charitable Giving IncCO7.5× affinity5 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Maxine Myers Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 20%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%8%15%22%30%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 11%
  • Greater Boston Food Bank Inc22% of income from government
  • Pine Street Inn Inc11% of income from government
  • Pillar Care Continuum1% of income from government
  • Rosie's Place Inc0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–30%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Maxine Myers Foundation Inc?

Find your warmest path to Maxine Myers Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 38 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph