Loading…
· Public charity
MAX SCHEWITZ FOUNDATION
The making of grants for education, medical and scientific purposes.
$149k
Granted FY2023
8
Grants
8
Communities
$40k
Largest
01What you fund
01FY2023 · 8 grants
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2023
- Under $10k2 grants · $10k
- $10k–50k6 grants · $139k
$15,000
Median grant
8
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
- ANN & ROBERT H LURIE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF CHICAGO FOUND$40,000
- RAINFOREST TRUST$34,017
- WHO WE PLAY FOR$25,000
- SUDDEN ARRHYTHMIA DEATH SYNDROME FOUNDATION$15,000
- CODY STEPHENS GO BIG OR GO HOME MEMORIAL FOUNDATION$15,000
- NICK OF TIME FOUNDATION$10,000
- ANDRA HEART FOUNDATION$5,000
- HEART FOR ATHLETES$5,000
02The need
02
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
show:
Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY23–23) land where the poverty rate runs at 13% — the area typically sits at 11%. 81% of your dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
03Your field
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
1
Holly Andersen Heart Foundation
Health
2
Cardinal Health Foundation
Education
3
American College of Cardiology Foundation
To transform cardiovascular care and improve heart health for all.
Health
4
Texas Cardiac Arrhythmia Research Founda
Philanthropy
5
The Heart Foundation
Philanthropy
6
The Stern Cardiovascular Foundation
The stern cardiovascular foundation, inc.'s mission is to promote community health through the provision of health care services and establish, equip, and maintain geographically dispersed outpatient clinic locations at which such services…
Health
7
Parent Heart Watch
The organization is the only national voice solely dedicated to protecting youth from sudden cardiac arrest and preventable sudden cardiac death. parent heart watch leads and empowers others by educating advocating for change.
Health
8
Simon's Fund
To create and advance innovative and evidence-based programs, policies and research that prevent sudden cardiac arrest and death in children, teens and young adults.
Health
9
Children's Heart Foundation
To raise funds to advance the diagnosis, treatment and prevention of congential heart defects.
—
10
Cardiology Foundation of New York
Health
11
Usc Arcadia Hospital Foundation
Mission statement the mission of usc arcadia hospital foundation is to engage in the solicitation, receipt, and administration of property, and from time to time to disburse such property and the income therefrom solely to, or for the…
Health
12
Rock From the Heart
Rock from the Heart raises awareness and provides education about aortic and heart valve disease, while offering support for patients and families. Activities include educational symposiums, heart screenings, online resources, and an…
Health
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Sudden Arrhythmia Death Syndromes and the most unlike its peers is Ann & Robert H Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
03the grantee network
8 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.
0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
8/8
Grew since you first funded
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Health$100,000International$34,017Public Safety & Disaster$10,000Other$5,000
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds ANN & ROBERT H LURIE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF CHICAGO FOUND ↗
- Who funds RAINFOREST TRUST ↗
- Who funds WHO WE PLAY FOR ↗
- Who funds CODY STEPHENS GO BIG OR GO HOME MEMORIAL FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds SUDDEN ARRHYTHMIA DEATH SYNDROME FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds NICK OF TIME FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds ANDRA HEART FOUNDATION ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
American Online Giving Foundation IncDE6.3× affinity4 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →
Open a dossier: American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organisation MAX SCHEWITZ FOUNDATION funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
2024
’20’21’22’23’24
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
typical government reliance, FY20–24
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
04Through Plinth
Through Plinth
Your grantmaking, live and operational
This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: NICK OF TIME FOUNDATION.
Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk
Financial management
insufficient risk
Limited financial data in public filings.
Track record & reputation
medium risk
4 years of Form 990 filings, still active.
Legal standing
low risk
US 501(c)(3); EIN 204200756 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.
Governance
Live in Plinth
Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.
Compliance & sanctions
Live in Plinth
OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.
Program capacity
Live in Plinth
Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.
Live · Plinth’s real DD engine
Run the actual assessment on NICK OF TIME FOUNDATION, cold from public data.
Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.
Post-award monitoring · continuous checks
- Awaiting reportFinancial stability— Runway not derivable from filings.
- On trackSustained operations— Filing through 2024; revenue grew over the period.
- On trackReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 6% of their budget — diversified.
- Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.
What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.
Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing
Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro
How do I get to Max Schewitz Foundation?
Find your warmest path to Max Schewitz Foundation through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.
Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.
More from the funding graph
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars pass through an intermediary
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
Strange bedfellows
the named clusters of US funding
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home
State money flows
the interactive map of money crossing state lines