Skip to content

Florida · Private foundation

Matthew 6 Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$458k
Granted FY2025(still arriving)
8
Grants FY2025
13
Organizations funded FY2024
38%
First-time grantees FY2024
Read the full brief
Median grant, FY2025
$60,000
Largest grant, FY2025
$142,104
Organizations funded a year
3 to 14
FY2021 to FY2024
States reached, FY2025
3
Total assets, FY2025
$726k
Applications
Takes unsolicited applications
Per its most recent filing; check its own site

How open it is to new grantees

In FY2024, 38% of the organizations Matthew 6 Foundation funded were first-time grantees, receiving 10% of its grant dollars.

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 90% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $62k went to new ones.

50%100%’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’22’23’24
InternationalHealthHuman ServicesReligionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
The numbers by year
Fiscal yearOrganizations fundedTo those organizationsFirst-time grantees
FY2025still arriving8$458k0%
FY202413$599k38%
FY202314$478k50%
FY202210$625k90%
FY20213$44kn/a
71% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2021 to 2025.

Education$509kArts & Culture$447kEnvironment$246kInternational$200kReligion$113kHealth$111kHousing & Shelter$103kHuman Services$68kOther$0

Top grantees

Largest recipients by total granted, FY2021 to FY2025, and the share of each one’s budget the grants supplied at peak.

GranteeTotal grantedYearsShare of their budget
Ride Nature Corporation$245,9463n/a
Global Leadership International Inc$200,000442%
Able Academy Inc$111,00033%
Better Together$102,5002n/a
Lifeline Children's Services Inc$18,12520%

Plus 19 recipients with no EIN on record ($1.5M), not named here.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a set of overlaps that mostly run through this funder rather than between each other.

Amazonsmile FoundationWA3.3× affinity4 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Compare Matthew 6 Foundation with peer funders

About Matthew 6 Foundation

How much does Matthew 6 Foundation give?
Matthew 6 Foundation reported 8 grants totaling $458,457 in its FY2025 IRS filing. It funded between 3 and 14 organizations a year over FY2021 to FY2024.
What does Matthew 6 Foundation fund?
By grant dollars over FY2021 to FY2025, its largest causes are Education (23%), Arts & Culture (20%), Environment (11%).
Who are Matthew 6 Foundation's largest grantees?
By total granted over FY2021 to FY2025: Ride Nature Corporation ($246k), Global Leadership International Inc ($200k), Able Academy Inc ($111k).
Does Matthew 6 Foundation fund new organizations?
In FY2024, 38% of the organizations it funded were first-time grantees.
Does Matthew 6 Foundation accept unsolicited applications?
Its most recent filing reports that it accepts unsolicited grant applications.
Which funders back the same organizations as Matthew 6 Foundation?
Its strongest co-funders, measured against what their size predicts, include Amazonsmile Foundation.
Where is Matthew 6 Foundation based?
Matthew 6 Foundation is based in FL.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 24 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Matthew 6’s filings →

More from the funding graph