Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Matta Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$82k
Granted FY2025still arriving
12
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$22k
Largest
01What you fund
0191% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20182025.

Health$133kPhilanthropy$70kReligion$42kArts & Culture$42kCivil Rights$28kFood & Nutrition$23kInternational$22kHuman Services$20kOther$0
02FY2025 · 12 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k9 grants · $33k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $49k
$4,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$1.9M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
UNIVERSITY OF CINCINNATI FOUNDATION$22,000
HINDUACTION$15,000
Individual grant recipient$12,000
SUPPORT A CHILD$9,400
ISKCON TEMPLE CINCINNATI$6,000
Individual grant recipient$4,000
EKAL VIDYALAYA FOUNDATION$3,650
INDIA CULTURAL ASSOCIATION$2,500
HINDU SOCIETY OF NORTH EAST FLORIDA$2,350
HINDU TEMPLE OF VIRGINIA$2,251
HINDU UNIVERSITY OF AMERICA$1,500
HINDU SOCIETY$1,430
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY18–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 92% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%HINDU UNIVERSITY OF AMERICA: $2k → 13%HINDU SOCIETY OF NORTH EAST FLORIDA: $2k → 14%SUPPORT A CHILD: $9k → 6%CINCINNATI PUBLIC RADIO: $2k → 16%AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF PHYSICIANS: $5k → 7%HINDU TEMPLE OF VIRGINIA: $2k → 4%EVF OF USA: $17k → 14%SUPPORT A CHILD: $5k → 6%HINDU TEMPLE OF VIRGINIA: $2k → 4%EVF OF USA: $17k → 14%SUPPORT A CHILD: $5k → 6%ISKCON TEMPLE CINCINNATI: $25k → 16%HINDU TEMPLE OF VIRGINIA: $2k → 4%EVF OF USA: $10k → 14%ISKCON TEMPLE CINCINNATI: $6k → 16%EVF OF USA: $10k → 14%FREE STORE FOOD BANK: $6k → 16%EVF OF USA: $10k → 14%EVF OF USA: $5k → 14%SHRI GOPAL TEMPLE: $6k → 16%DIYA FOUNDATION: $5k → 16%HINDU SOCIETY: $5k → 16%SHRI GOPAL TEMPLE: $5k → 16%SHRI GOPAL TEMPLE: $4k → 16%SHRI GOPAL TEMPLE: $4k → 16%SHRI GOPAL TEMPLE: $3k → 16%SHRI GOPAL TEMPLE: $3k → 16%SHRI GOPAL TEMPLE: $3k → 16%HINDU SOCIETY: $3k → 16%HINDU SOCIETY: $2k → 16%HINDU SOCIETY: $2k → 16%RAJASTHAN SERA RELIEF FOUNDATION: $2k → 16%INDIA CULTURAL ASSOCIATION: $3k → 16%HINDU SOCIETY: $2k → 16%INDIA CULTURAL ASSOCIATION: $3k → 16%INDIA CULTURAL ASSOCIATION: $2k → 16%UNIVERSITY OF CINCINNATI FOUNDATION: $27k → 16%UNIVERSITY OF CINCINNATI FOUNDATION: $25k → 16%UNIVERSITY OF CINCINNATI FOUNDATION: $25k → 16%UNIVERSITY OF CINCINNATI FOUNDATION: $25k → 16%UNIVERSITY OF CINCINNATI FOUNDATION: $22k → 16%GREATER CINCINNATI FOUNDATION: $35k → 16%GREATER CINCINNATI FOUNDATION: $30k → 16%FREESTORE FOOD BANK: $10k → 16%FREESTORE FOOD BANK: $6k → 16%PM CARES FUND NEW DELHI INDIA: $5k → 16%MAHANUBHAV INTERNATIONAL CHARITABLE: $3k → 16%LMMFS DEENANATH: $12k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

04

Where the work is directed

The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.

About 6% of Matta Family Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another. Read by recipient address, 79% of the giving stays in OH; read by stated purpose it is 72% — less of the work is directed home than the recipients' locations suggest.

Matta Family Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address

Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

92%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$377k · 16 repeat orgs$34k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +50% since the first grant, against +26% for the ones you funded once.

16 repeat relationships — 11 still active in FY2025, 5 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

16
14

Total granted

$377k
$22k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+50%
+26%

Still filing today

38%
14%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 85% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $12k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Arts & CulturePhilanthropyFood & NutritionHealthInternationalOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TU
    THE UNIVERSITY OF CINCINNATI FOUNDATION
    5× · 2021–2025 · $124k · revenue +26%
  • H
    HINDUACTION
    3× · 2023–2025 · $28k · revenue +99%
  • FF
    FREESTORE FOODBANK INC
    4× · 2018–2022 · $23k · revenue +50%

Funded once

  • PC
    PM CARES FUND NEW DELHI INDIA
    one grant, 2020 · $5k
  • DF
    DIYA FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2019 · $5k
  • MI
    MAHANUBHAV INTERNATIONAL CHARITABLE
    one grant, 2020 · $3k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Confederation of Indian Industry

Confederation of indian industry is india's largest industry association whose goal is to develop indian industry and to ensure that government and society as a whole, understand both the needs of industry and its contribution to the…

2
Hindus for Human Rights

Support & protect human rights.

Education
3
Hindu American Foundation Inc

Haf advances the understanding of hinduism to secure the rights and dignity of hindu americans now and for generations to come.

Arts & Culture
4
International Hindu University Inc

Our mission as per the by-laws : a) the board adopts a strategic plan that includes goals which will lead to acquiring accreditation recognized by us department of education and maintaining it. this includes getting an accreditation from…

Religion
5
Central Indiana Corporate Partnership Inc

Central indiana corporate partnership (cicp) is an alliance of indiana's business and research university leaders coming together to foster long-term prosperity for the region. cicp's mission is to transform the economy of indiana in order…

Community Improvement
6
Nalanda 20

Improve excellence and access in higher education. Current focus is on India. Thus, Nalanda 2.0's current focus is to make India's higher education system world-class by building a world-class multidisciplinary research university,…

Education
7
American Inst of Indian Studies

Dedicated to the advancement of knowledge about india and the promotion of intellectual engagement with india in american universities by providing research fellowship support, training in indian languages, knowledge of indian culture, and…

Social Science
8
The American India Foundation

The american india foundation(aif) is a nonprofit american development organization that is devoted to accelerating social and economic change in india.

Public Safety & Disaster
9
Indiana University Alumni Association Inc

The indiana university alumni association activates and supports the global alumni network- encouraging alumni to grow a lifelong connection with indiana university, and inspiring their ongoing generosity toward each other and the…

10
University of Indianapolis

The University of Indianapolis champions lifelong learning through relevant and innovative education that fosters experiential learning, diverse perspectives, service for impact, and a global mindset.

Education
11
Lehigh University

The university's goal in the coming decade is to advance learning through the integration of teaching, research and service to others. the core of this goal is to prepare graduates to engage with the world and lead lives of meaning. to do…

Education
12
Cincinnati Museum Center

Cincinnati museum center inspires people of all ages to learn more about our world through science, regional history, and educational, engaging and meaningful experiences.

Arts & Culture

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The University of Cincinnati Foundation and the most unlike its peers is American Heart Association Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

05the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 32 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
9/9
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Individual grant recipient — $69,640 · OtherIndividual grant recipientISKCON TEMPLE CINCINNATI — $31,000 · OtherISKCON TEMPLE CINCINNATIIndividual grant recipient — $27,055 · OtherIndividual grant recipientSUPPORT A CHILD — $19,500 · OtherSUPPORT A CHILDHINDU SOCIETY — $16,337 · OtherHINDU SOCIETYIndividual grant recipient — $12,000 · OtherINDIA CULTRUAL ASSOCIATION — $9,500 · Other+18 more — $48,301 · Other+18 moreTHE UNIVERSITY OF CINCINNATI FOUNDATION — $124,000 · PhilanthropyTHE UNIVERSITY OF CINCINNATI FOUNDATIONTHE GREATER CINCINNATI FOUNDATION — $65,000 · PhilanthropyTHE GREATER CINCINNATI FOUNDATIONHINDUACTION — $27,500 · Arts & CultureCincinnati Public Radio Inc — $3,000 · Arts & CultureFREESTORE FOODBANK INC — $22,700 · Food & NutritionASSOCIATION FOR INDIAS DEVELOPMENT INC — $500 · InternationalAmerican Heart Association Inc — $200 · Health
Other$233,333Philanthropy$189,000Arts & Culture$30,500Food & Nutrition$22,700International$500Health$200

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetTHE UNIVERSITY OF CINCINNATI FOUNDATION — $124,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetTHE GREATER CINCINNATI FOUNDATION — $65,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetHINDUACTION — $27,500 over 3y, 4.4% of budgetFREESTORE FOODBANK INC — $22,700 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetCincinnati Public Radio Inc — $3,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetHindu University of America — $3,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetVISHWA HINDU PARISHAD OF AMERICA INC — $1,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetASSOCIATION FOR INDIAS DEVELOPMENT INC — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc — $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THE UNIVERSITY OF CINCINNATI FOUNDATION
  • Who funds THE GREATER CINCINNATI FOUNDATION
  • Who funds HINDUACTION
  • Who funds FREESTORE FOODBANK INC
  • Who funds Cincinnati Public Radio Inc
  • Who funds Hindu University of America
  • Who funds VISHWA HINDU PARISHAD OF AMERICA INC
  • Who funds ASSOCIATION FOR INDIAS DEVELOPMENT INC
  • Who funds American Heart Association Inc

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

American Online Giving Foundation IncDE6.7× affinity4 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Matta Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 20%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    2get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 32 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph