Skip to content

· Private foundation

Matt Leinart Foundation

Its FY2020 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$44k
Granted FY2020
3
Grants FY2020
2
States reached
$30k
Largest
01What it funds
0180% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2020.

Health$48kEducation$17kRecreation & Sports$14kYouth Development$14kArts & Culture$12kPhilanthropy$4kInternational$3kReligion$2kOther$0
02FY2020 · 3 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2020

  • Under $10k1 grant · $3k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $42k
$11,500
Median grant
2
States reached
$89k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CHOC FOUNDATION$30,000
BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB$11,500
COSTA MESA POP WARNER$2,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–20) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 47% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.

area typical 11%COSTA MESA POP WARNER: $3k → 10%ROLLIE INVITATIONAL: $5k → 14%Heisman Trophy Trust: $2k → 17%SPECIAL OLYMPICS: $11k → 14%UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN: $5k → 14%ROAD RUNNER FOOTBALL BOOSTER: $180 → 12%BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB: $12k → 13%GOOD360ORG: $1k → 9%OPERATION SMILE: $1k → 10%COSTA MESA POP WARNER: $3k → 10%14TH ANNUAL MESA: $2k → 14%HEISMAN TROPHY TRUST: $2k → 17%COSTA MESA POP WARNER: $2k → 10%OTHER BOOSTERS: $2k → 14%COSTA MESA POP WARNER: $2k → 10%OTHER BOOSTERS: $500 → 14%COSTA MESA AMERICAN LITTLE LEAGUE: $1k → 10%OTHER BOOSTERS: $400 → 14%CHOC FOUNDATION: $30k → 10%BISHOP MORA SALESIAN HIGH SCHOOL: $5k → 14%PROJECT HOPE: $3k → 10%BE PERFECT FOUNDATION: $12k → 14%COSTA MESA FOUNDATION: $3k → 10%LIGHTTHENIGHTORG: $500 → 14%NEWPORT HARBOUR FOOTBALL: $3k → 10%DIOCESE OF ORANGE: $2k → 10%FOUNTAIN VALLEY HIGH SCHOOL FOOTBALL: $400 → 10%MATER DEI HIGH SCHOOL: $6k → 10%MATER DEI HIGH SCHOOL: $3k → 10%ORANGEWOOD FOUNDATION: $3k → 10%CALVARY CHAPEL HIGH SCHOOL FOOTBALL: $2k → 10%STALLION BOOSTERS: $2k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

21%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$26k · 5 repeat orgs$101k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +51% since the first grant, against +44% for those funded once.

5 repeat relationships: 1 still active in FY2020, 4 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2020 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

5
20

Total granted

$26k
$59k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+51%
+44%

Still filing today

20%
30%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2020, 6% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $42k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20
HealthCrime & LegalRecreation & SportsEducationInternationalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MD
    MATER DEI HIGH SCHOOL ROMAN CATHOLIC BISHOP OF ORANGE
    2× · 2017–2018 · $9k
  • CM
    COSTA MESA POP WARNER
    4× · 2017–2020 · $8k
  • SA
    SANTA ANA POP WARNER
    2× · 2017–2019 · $4k

Funded once

  • BP
    BE PERFECT FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2018 · $12k · revenue -65%
  • SO
    SPECIAL OLYMPICS INCgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $11k · revenue +44%
  • UO
    University of Michigangraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $5k · revenue +140%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
United States Olympic and Paralympic Committee

Empowering the competitive excellence and well-being of team usa athletes, championing the power of sport, and inspiring the nation.

Recreation & Sports
2
Children's Hospital & Research Center At Oakland

The mission of children's hospital & research center at oakland is to protect and advance the health and well-being of children through clinical care, teaching and research.

Health
3
The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia

The children's hospital of philadelphia, the oldest hospital in the united states dedicated exclusively to pediatrics, strives to be the world leader in the advancement of health care for children by integrating excellent patient care,…

Health
4
Phoenix Children's Hospital

To advance hope, healing and the best healthcare for children and their families.

Health
5
Oc Players League
Recreation & Sports
6
Ola Athletic Association
—
7
United States Olympic and Paralympic Foundation

To generate philanthropic support for the united states olympic and paralympic committee (usopc). the usopc's mission is: empowering the competitive excellence and well-being of team usa athletes, championing the power of sport, and…

Recreation & Sports
8
Stony Brook Orthopedic Associates University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
9
Operation Screen Your Athlete
—
10
University Hospital & Clinics Inc

The organization provides medical care to improve, maintain, and restore the health of the people in the communities we serve.

Health
11
Children's Healthcare of California

The primary exempt purpose of children's healthcare of california includes without limitation the receipt of distributions and grants for the making of distributions and grants to children's hospital of orange county (choc) and to…

Health
12
Madison County Community Hospital

Madison health's vision is to provide exceptional healthcare in a respectful, compassionate, and healing environment.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Special Olympics Inc; the most unlike its peers is Heisman Trophy Trust. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 27 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
7/8
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB: $11,500 · OtherBOYS AND GIRLS CLUBMATER DEI HIGH SCHOOL ROMAN CATHOLIC BISHOP OF ORANGE: $8,500 · OtherMATER DEI HIGH SCHOOL ROMAN CATHOLIC BISHOP OF ORANGECOSTA MESA POP WARNER: $8,000 · OtherCOSTA MESA POP WARNERUniversity of Michigan: $5,000 · OtherUniversity of MichiganIndividual grant recipient: $5,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientBISHOP MORA SALESIAN HIGH SCHOOL: $4,500 · OtherBISHOP MORA SALESIAN HIGH SCHOOLSANTA ANA POP WARNER: $3,750 · OtherSANTA ANA POP WARNERIndividual grant recipient: $2,900 · OtherPROJECT HOPE: $2,500 · OtherCOSTA MESA FOUNDATION: $2,500 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $2,500 · Other+10 more: $11,046 · Other+10 moreCHOC FOUNDATION: $30,000 · HealthCHOC FOUNDATIONBE PERFECT FOUNDATION: $11,500 · HealthBE PERFECT FOUNDATIONSPECIAL OLYMPICS INC: $11,000 · Recreation & SportsSPECIAL O…HEISMAN TROPHY TRUST: $3,200 · EducationORANGEWOOD FOUNDATION: $2,500 · Crime & LegalOPERATION SMILE INC: $1,000 · International
Other$67,696Health$41,500Recreation & Sports$11,000Education$3,200Crime & Legal$2,500International$1,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCHOC FOUNDATION: $30,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetBE PERFECT FOUNDATION: $11,500 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetSPECIAL OLYMPICS INC: $11,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUniversity of Michigan: $5,000 over 1y, 1.9% of budgetHEISMAN TROPHY TRUST: $3,200 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetORANGEWOOD FOUNDATION: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetOPERATION SMILE INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds CHOC FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds BE PERFECT FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds SPECIAL OLYMPICS INC ↗
  • Who funds University of Michigan ↗
  • Who funds HEISMAN TROPHY TRUST ↗
  • Who funds ORANGEWOOD FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds OPERATION SMILE INC ↗
  • Who funds COSTA MESA LITTLE LEAGUE ↗

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Matt Leinart Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Matt Leinart Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 27 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2020, released 2020. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Matt Leinart’s filings →

    More from the funding graph