Skip to content

· Public charity

Massachusetts State Labor Council Afl-Cio

To empower and support workers in their effort to promote justice, educate the public about the value of unions, and improve the economic stability and security of working families and communities throughout the commonwealth of massachusetts.

$129k
Granted FY2023
3
Grants FY2023
1
States reached
$50k
Largest
01What it funds
0195% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2023.

Civil Rights$381kEmployment$95kPhilanthropy$30kPublic Benefit$12kPublic Safety & Disaster$10kOther$0
02FY2023 · 3 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 3 grants below total $70,000, the rows itemized in this filing. The $129,050 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $59,050 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2023

  • Under $10k1 grant · $6k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $14k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $50k
$14,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$7.5M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MA NOT FOR SALE$50,000
MASS AFL-CIO WORKING PEOPLES FUND$14,000
RESIST INC$6,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–23) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 82% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%MASS AFL-CIO WORKING PEOPLES FUND: $19k → 8%RAISE UP MASSACHUSETTS: $65k → 16%WESTERN MASS AREA LABOR FEDERATION: $30k → 17%THE SULLIVAN FAMILY FUND: $10k → 11%MASS AFL-CIO WORKING PEOPLES FUND: $19k → 8%RAISE UP MASSACHUSETTS: $50k → 16%MASS AFL-CIO WORKING PEOPLES FUND: $15k → 8%RAISE UP MASSACHUSETTS: $20k → 16%MASS AFL-CIO WORKING PEOPLES FUND: $15k → 8%RAISE UP MASSACHUSETTS: $10k → 16%MASS AFL-CIO WORKING PEOPLES FUND: $14k → 8%RESIST INC: $6k → 16%MASS AFL-CIO WORKING PEOPLES FUND: $13k → 8%COALITION TO PROTECT WORKERS RIGHTS: $105k → 16%MA NOT FOR SALE: $50k → 16%COALITION TO PROTECT WORKERS RIGHTS: $50k → 16%MASSACHUSETTS COALITION FOR OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH: $10k → 16%IATSE LOCAL 11: $15k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

77%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$445k · 3 repeat orgs$133k to everyone else

3 repeat relationships: 2 still active in FY2023, 1 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2023 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

3
6

Total granted

$445k
$127k

Still filing today

0%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2023, 91% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $6k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’21’22’23
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’21’22’23
Arts & CulturePublic Safety & DisasterOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CT
    COALITION TO PROTECT WORKERS RIGHTS
    3× · 2021–2023 · $205k
  • RU
    RAISE UP MASSACHUSETTS
    5× · 2017–2022 · $145k
  • MA
    MASS AFL-CIO WORKING PEOPLES FUND
    7× · 2017–2023 · $95k

Funded once

  • VY
    Vote Yes on Work and Family Mobility
    one grant, 2022 · $50k
  • PV
    PIONEER VALLEY CENTRAL LABOR COUNCIL
    2× · 2019–2020 · $30k · revenue 0%
  • IA
    I A T S E LOCAL #11graduated
    2× · 2020–2021 · $15k · revenue +238%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Western Massachusetts Area Labor Federation

Labor organization

—
2
International Brotherhood of Teamsters Local 957

Labor union

—
3
University of Michigan

To represent and advocate for its member physicians.

—
4
Massachusetts Afl-Cio Scholarship Corporation
Education
5
Massachusetts Correction Officers Federated Union

MCOFU is the state recognized collective bargaining representative for all employees of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts Department of Corrections Unit 4.

Recreation & Sports
6
United Steelworkers International

The mission statement of the organizatin includes, but is not limited to, on behalf of its members, collective bargaining, greivance procedures, arbitration, strike benefits, education, and to improve the working conditions of its members.

—
7
United Steelworkers International 00241

The Mission Statement of the Organization Includes, but is not limited to, on Behalf of its Members Collective Bargaining, Grievance Procedures, Arbitration, Strike Benefits, Education, and to Improve the Working Conditions of its Members.

—
8
Aft Massachusetts

State labor organization

—
9
United Steelworkers Local 12-07600

The mission statement of the Organization includes, but is not limited to on behalf of its Members Collective Barganing, Grievance procedures, Arbitration, Strike Benefits, Education, and to improve the working conditions of its Members.

—
10
Afl-Cio Snohomish & Island County Labor Council

Member, affiliate, and community education for worker's issues - union and non-union

—
11
Brookline Fire Fighters Association

Labor organization to organize all paid professional fire fightes within Brookline

—
12
Unite Here Iu Local No 54

To organize all workers for the economic, moral and social advancement of their condition and status.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Greater Boston Mass Labor Council Afl-Cio; the most unlike its peers is Sullivan Family Fund. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 10 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
7/8
Grantees still filing
6/8
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

COALITION TO PROTECT WORKERS RIGHTS: $205,000 · OtherCOALITION TO PROTECT WORKERS RIGHTSRAISE UP MASSACHUSETTS: $145,000 · OtherRAISE UP MASSACHUSETTSMASS AFL-CIO WORKING PEOPLES FUND: $95,097 · OtherMASS AFL-CIO WORKING PEOPLES FUNDVote Yes on Work and Family Mobility: $50,000 · OtherVote Yes on Work and Family MobilityPIONEER VALLEY CENTRAL LABOR COUNCIL: $30,250 · OtherPIONEER VALLEY CENTRAL LABOR COUNCIL+3 more: $28,000 · OtherI A T S E LOCAL #11: $15,000 · Arts & CultureMASSACHUSETTS COALITION FOR OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH INC: $10,000 · Public Safety & Disaster
Other$553,347Arts & Culture$15,000Public Safety & Disaster$10,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetI A T S E LOCAL #11: $15,000 over 2y, 3.9% of budgetSULLIVAN FAMILY FUND: $10,000 over 1y, 6.3% of budgetRESIST INC: $6,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds PIONEER VALLEY CENTRAL LABOR COUNCIL ↗
  • Who funds I A T S E LOCAL #11 ↗
  • Who funds MASSACHUSETTS COALITION FOR OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH INC ↗
  • Who funds SULLIVAN FAMILY FUND ↗
  • Who funds RESIST INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a set of overlaps that mostly run through this funder rather than between each other.

Painters and Allied Trades DC #35 Allied Trades District Council #35MA13.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Painters and Allied Trades DC #35 Allied Trades District Council #35

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Massachusetts State Labor Council Afl-Cio funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Massachusetts State Labor Council Afl-Cio. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →median 11%
  • Massachusetts Coalition for Occupational Safety and Health Inc: 11% of income from government
  • Resist Inc: 2% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 10 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2023, released 2023. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2024) is on record and reports $67k of grant expense, but none of it to a named recipient. On a Form 990 that can mean grants abroad, filed by region only (Schedule F), grants under $5,000, which are not itemized, or a schedule referenced as an attachment the e-file does not carry. The figures above are therefore from FY2023, the most recent year this funder named its grantees.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Massachusetts State Labor Council Afl-Cio’s filings →

More from the funding graph