Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

Massachusetts Communities Action Network Inc

Mcan is a faith and values organizing group focused on people, power, and change.

$281k
Granted FY2025still arriving
6
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$85k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20182025.

Civil Rights$471kReligion$458kCommunity Improvement$428kPhilanthropy$98kHuman Services$35k
02FY2025 · 6 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 6 grants below total $275,000 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $281,009 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $6,009 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k5 grants · $190k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $85k
$45,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$1.3M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
UNITED INTERFAITH ACTION$85,000
WORCESTER INTERFAITH$45,000
PIONEER VALLEY PROJECT$45,000
BROCKTON INTERFAITH COMMUNITY$45,000
ESSEX COUNTY COMMUNITY ORGANIZATION$40,000
BERKSHIRE INTERFAITH ORGANIZING$15,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY18–25, $795k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%UNITED INTERFAITH ACTION: $85k → 11%BERKSHIRE INTERFAITH ORGANIZING: $20k → 12%PIONEER VALLEY PROJECT': $60k → 17%UNITED INTERFAITH ACTION: $75k → 11%BERKSHIRE INTERFAITH ORGANIZING: $15k → 12%PIONEER VALLEY PROJECT': $55k → 17%UNITED INTERFAITH ACTION: $71k → 11%PIONEER VALLEY PROJECT: $45k → 17%UNITED INTERFAITH ACTION: $51k → 11%PIONEER VALLEY PROJECT: $40k → 17%UNITED INTERFAITH ACTION: $51k → 11%PIONEER VALLEY PROJECT': $37k → 17%UNITED INTERFAITH ACTION: $50k → 11%PIONEER VALLEY PROJECT: $18k → 17%UNITED INTERFAITH ACTION: $49k → 11%PIONEER VALLEY PROJECT: $18k → 17%UNITED INTERFAITH ACTION: $40k → 11%PIONEER VALLEY PROJECT: $18k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

100%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$1.4M · 8 repeat orgs$5k to everyone else

8 repeat relationships — 5 still active in FY2025, 3 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

8
1

Total granted

$1.4M
$5k

Still filing today

88%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesCommunity ImprovementReligionOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • UI
    UNITED INTERFAITH ACTION OF SE MA
    8× · 2018–2025 · $471k · revenue +171% · 63% of their budget
  • PV
    PIONEER VALLEY PROJECT INC
    8× · 2018–2025 · $289k · revenue +182% · 28% of their budget
  • BROCKTON INTERFAITH COMMUNITY INC
    8× · 2018–2025 · $273k · revenue +736% · 38% of their budget

Funded once

  • RU
    RAISE UP MASSACHUSETTS 2022
    one grant, 2019 · $5k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Urban Impact Initiative Massachusetts

Urban Impact is dedicated to prioritizing the reduction of the impact of poverty for families in the Commonwealth. The organization offers a plethora of small business corporate and community opportunities. These opportunities include…

Youth Development
2
Unitarian Universalist Massachusetts Action Network Inc

Our mission is to organize and mobilize Unitarian Universalists in Massachusetts to control oppression. We provide pathways towards justice and identify opportunities in which we can live our values.

Religion
3
Durham Congregations in Action

Dcia organizes communities of diverse faiths to work for racial justice, social equity, and human dignity.

Human Services
4
Brockton Area Workforce Investment Board Inc

MassHire creates and sustains powerful connections between businesses and job seekers through a statewide network of employment professionals.

Employment
5
Vermont Interfaith Action Inc

Vermont interfaith action is a faith-based, grassroots coalition of congregations that transforms ordinary people into empowered and engaged citizens. our goal is to create the hope, power, knowledge, and political will needed to make…

Human Services
6
Northeast Kingdom Organizing

Coalition that has come together to organize and advocate for justice for the people and places of vermonts northeast kingdom.

Community Improvement
7
Greater Boston Council On Alcoholism Inc
Philanthropy
8
Essex County Industrial Development Agency Inc

Our mission is to create a viable business atmosphere that will attract compatible and diverse sustainable economic development opportunities.

9
Berk County Regional Employment Board

To provide policy guidance, selection and oversight and to organize programs for the purpose of work force development in berkshire county, massachusetts.

Employment
10
Virginia Interfaith Center for Public Policy

Working within the faith community to educate and mobilize citizen to create systemic social change for low income Virginians.

11
Boston Collaborative Inc

To connect, inform and engage christians to drastically impact unacceptable realities in boston. we do this by listening, innovating, and building what god is already doing

Religion
12
Easton Area Neighborhood Centers Inc

Easton area neighborhood centers, inc. (eanc) is committed to providing an array of services that enhance the quality of life for low- and moderate-income residents of northampton county. through innovative programming, educational…

Human Services

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Brockton Interfaith Community Inc and the most unlike its peers is Berkshire Interfaith Organizing Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 10 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

4
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
6/8
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

UNITED INTERFAITH ACTION OF SE MA — $471,397 · Human ServicesUNITED INTERFAITH ACTION OF SE MAPIONEER VALLEY PROJECT INC — $289,000 · Human ServicesPIONEER VALLEY PROJECT INCBERKSHIRE INTERFAITH ORGANIZING INC — $35,000 · Human ServicesWORCESTER INTERFAITH INC — $154,435 · Community ImprovementWORCESTER INTERFAITH …ESSEX COUNTY COMMUNITY ORGANIZATION — $99,124 · Community ImprovementESSEX COUNTY COMMUNIT…DORCHESTER BAY ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION — $35,000 · Community ImprovementDORCHESTER BAY ECONOM…BROCKTON INTERFAITH COMMUNITY INC — $273,281 · ReligionBROCKTON INTERFAITH …ESSEX COUNTY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC — $92,500 · PhilanthropyWORCESTER INTERFAITH — $35,000 · OtherRAISE UP MASSACHUSETTS 2022 — $5,000 · Other
Human Services$795,397Community Improvement$288,559Religion$273,281Philanthropy$92,500Other$40,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetUNITED INTERFAITH ACTION OF SE MA — $471,397 over 8y, 63% of budgetPIONEER VALLEY PROJECT INC — $289,000 over 8y, 28% of budgetBROCKTON INTERFAITH COMMUNITY INC — $273,281 over 8y, 38% of budgetWORCESTER INTERFAITH INC — $154,435 over 4y, 14% of budgetESSEX COUNTY COMMUNITY ORGANIZATION — $99,124 over 4y, 11% of budgetESSEX COUNTY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC — $92,500 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetBERKSHIRE INTERFAITH ORGANIZING INC — $35,000 over 2y, 43% of budgetDORCHESTER BAY ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION — $35,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds UNITED INTERFAITH ACTION OF SE MA
  • Who funds PIONEER VALLEY PROJECT INC
  • Who funds BROCKTON INTERFAITH COMMUNITY INC
  • Who funds WORCESTER INTERFAITH INC
  • Who funds ESSEX COUNTY COMMUNITY ORGANIZATION
  • Who funds ESSEX COUNTY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds BERKSHIRE INTERFAITH ORGANIZING INC
  • Who funds DORCHESTER BAY ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Massachusetts Budget and Policy Center IncMA15.8× affinity5 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Massachusetts Budget and Policy Center Inc · Third Sector New England Inc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Massachusetts Communities Action Network Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 40%3%13%28%50%your share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 15%
  • Essex County Community Organization15% of income from government
  • Essex County Community Foundation Inc2% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
4get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Massachusetts Communities Action Network Inc?

Find your warmest path to Massachusetts Communities Action Network Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 10 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph