Loading…
· Public charity
MASSACHUSETTS ALLIANCE ON TEEN PREGNANCY
To advocate statewide and mobilize communities to prevent teen pregnancy, to increase opportunities for youth and young parents, and to empower young people to make healthy decisions about relationships, sex, parenting, and life.
$234k
Granted FY2018
13
Grants
1
Communities
$88k
Largest
01What you fund
01FY2018 · 13 grants
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2018
- Under $10k8 grants · $12k
- $10k–50k4 grants · $91k
- $50k–250k1 grant · $88k
$3,624
Median grant
1
States reached
$181k
Total assets
Largest grants
- INSTITUTE FOR COMMUNITY HEALTH$87,784
- CITY OF LAWRENCE$31,250
- GREATER LAWRENCE TECHNICAL SCHOOL$30,000
- YMCA OF GREATER SPRINGFIELD$20,000
- SPRINGFIELD RENAISSANCE SCHOOL$10,000
- BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF GREATER HOLYOKE$5,000
- PHOENIX CHARTER ACADEMY$3,624
- SI SE PUEDE INC$1,440
- MASSACHUSETTS SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO CHILDREN$700
- COMMUNITY DAY CARE OF LAWRENCE$700
- HEALTH QUARTERS V$500
- GREATER LAWRENCE FAMILY HEALTH CENTER$200
- LAWRENCE BOYS & GIRLS CLUB INC$100
02The need
02
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
show:
Your human-services grants (FY18–18, $20k) land where the poverty rate runs at 17% — the area typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
03Your field
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
1
Greater Lowell Health Alliance
To sustain a strategic alliance of community organizations that improves the overall health and wellness of those living in the greater lowell region.
Health
2
Massachusetts League of Community Health
To promote population health equity for all through leadership and programs supporting community health centers and members in achieving their goals of accessible, quality, comprehensive, and community responsive health care.
—
3
Lowell Community Health Center Inc
Lowell community health center's mission is to provide caring, quality, and culturally competent health services to the people of greater lowell, regardless of their financial status; to reduce health disparities and enhance the health of…
Health
4
Greater Lowell Family Ymca
The greater lowell family ymca's mission is to strengthen our community by supporting youth development, healthy living and social responsibility for all through programs influenced by our core values of caring, honesty, respect and…
Human Services
5
Holyoke Community Childcare
Holyoke Community Childcare HCC cultivates child, family and community well-being and progress.
Human Services
6
Lynn Community Health Inc
To provide comprehensive healthcare of the highest quality for everyone in the greater lynn community regardless of ability to pay.
—
7
Infant Toddler Children's Center Inc
To be a learning community where children, from infants to school age, come together with experienced and responsive teachers to learn about themselves, each other, and the world.
Human Services
8
Massachusetts Public Health Association
The massachusetts public health association (mpha) is the champion for public health in the commonwealth. we are a catalyst for change, eliminating health inequities and promoting healthy communities for all.
Health
9
Lynn Community Health Center
Improve access to health services in the community of lynn, massachusetts and to support the mission of lynn community health center (continued on schedule o)which is to provide comprehensive health care of the highest quality for everyone…
Health
10
Greater New Bedford Community Health
To serve, educate, and inspire our patients in becoming more knowledgeable and participatory in their total health. to be a regional resource and leader focused on improving public health in the communities we serve. core values- empathize…
—
11
Harvard Street Neighborhood Health
Provide world-class clinical care in a safe & compassionate patient-centered healing environment.
Health
12
Family Health Center of Worcesterinc
Family health center of worcester's mission is to improve the health and well-being of all residents in the greater worcester area, especially culturally diverse populations, by providing access to affordable, high quality, integrated,…
—
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Greater Lawrence Family Health Center and the most unlike its peers is Institute for Community Health Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
03the grantee network
11 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.
1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/11
Grantees still filing
7/11
Grew since you first funded
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Health$88,484Other$48,390Education$33,624Human Services$20,000Crime & Legal$700Youth Development$100
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds INSTITUTE FOR COMMUNITY HEALTH ↗
- Who funds GREATER LAWRENCE TECHNICAL SCHOOL ↗
- Who funds YMCA OF GREATER SPRINGFIELD ↗
- Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF GREATER HOLYOKE ↗
- Who funds PHOENIX CHARTER ACADEMY ↗
- Who funds SI SE PUEDE INC ↗
- Who funds MASSACHUSETTS SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO CHILDREN ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY DAY CARE OF LAWRENCE ↗
- Who funds HEALTH QUARTERS V ↗
- Who funds GREATER LAWRENCE FAMILY HEALTH CENTER ↗
- Who funds LAWRENCE BOYS & GIRLS CLUB INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Boston Foundation IncMA16.7× affinity6 shared granteesties to 8 of 8Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →
Open a dossier: Boston Foundation Inc · Essex County Community Foundation Inc · Amelia Peabody Foundation · The Beveridge Family Foundation · Eastern Bank Foundation · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organisation MASSACHUSETTS ALLIANCE ON TEEN PREGNANCY funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
2024
’20’21’22’23’24
- Community Day Care Center of — 11% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
6get no government money at all
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
typical government reliance, FY20–24
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
04Through Plinth
Through Plinth
Your grantmaking, live and operational
This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: GREATER LAWRENCE TECHNICAL SCHOOL.
Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk
Financial management
low risk
~18 months of operating runway; revenue grew over 7 filed years.
Track record & reputation
low risk
7 years of Form 990 filings, still active; revenue up 3.4× since.
Legal standing
low risk
US 501(c)(3); EIN 202144356 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.
Governance
Live in Plinth
Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.
Compliance & sanctions
Live in Plinth
OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.
Program capacity
Live in Plinth
Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.
Live · Plinth’s real DD engine
Run the actual assessment on GREATER LAWRENCE TECHNICAL SCHOOL, cold from public data.
Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.
Post-award monitoring · continuous checks
- On trackFinancial stability— Roughly 18 months of cash on hand.
- On trackSustained operations— Filing through 2024; revenue grew over the period.
- WatchReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 65% of their budget — load-bearing; a dependency Plinth would track.
- Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.
What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.
Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing
Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro
How do I get to Massachusetts Alliance on Teen Pregnancy?
Find your warmest path to Massachusetts Alliance on Teen Pregnancy through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.
Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.
More from the funding graph
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars pass through an intermediary
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
Strange bedfellows
the named clusters of US funding
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home
State money flows
the interactive map of money crossing state lines