Skip to content

· Public charity

Maryland Bar Foundation

To foster and maintain the honor and integrity of the profession of the law, to improve and to facilitate the administration of justice, and to promote the study of the law and law research, and sharing legal knowledge.

$69k
Granted FY2025still arriving
4
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$9k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2025.

Crime & Legal$180kHuman Services$8kArts & Culture$8kPhilanthropy$7kHealth$5kEducation$5k
02FY2025 · 4 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 4 grants below total $26,618, the rows itemized in this filing. The $69,426 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $42,808 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.
$7,300
Median grant
2
States reached
$913k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
NATIONAL JUDICIAL COLLEGE$8,618
UNITED WAY OF CENTRAL MARYLAND$7,300
MARYLAND YOUTH & THE LAW$5,500
PRO BONO RESOURCE CENTER$5,200
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY18–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 91% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 7%TAHIRIH JUSTICE CENTER: $11k → 6%NATIONAL JUDICIAL COLLEGE: $9k → 10%YMCA OF ANNAPOLIS: $8k → 6%FOUNDATION FOR BALTIMORE COUNTY PUBLIC LIBRARY: $5k → 11%THE BALTIMORE COURTHOUSE & LAW MUSEUM FOUNDATION: $8k → 19%NATIONAL JUDICIAL COLLEGE: $7k → 10%CONFLICT RESOLUTION CENTER OF BALTIMORE COUNTY: $10k → 11%MARYLAND YOUTH AND THE LAW: $20k → 19%PRO BONO RESOURCE CENTER: $18k → 19%MARYLAND YOUTH & THE LAW: $15k → 19%MARYLAND YOUTH & THE LAW: $14k → 19%PRO BONO RESOURCE CENTER: $10k → 19%PRO BONO RESOURCE CENTER: $9k → 19%MARYLAND YOUTH & THE LAW: $9k → 19%MARYLAND YOUTH AND THE LAW: $8k → 19%PRO BONO RESOURCE CENTER OF MARYLAND: $8k → 19%MARYLAND VOLUNTEER LAWYERS SERVICE: $7k → 19%PRO BONO RESOURCE CENTER: $7k → 19%PRO BONO RESOURCE CENTER: $6k → 19%MARYLAND YOUTH & THE LAW: $6k → 19%MSBA LEADERSHIP ACADEMY: $5k → 19%PRO BONO RESOURCE CENTER: $5k → 19%CIVIL JUSTICE INC: $5k → 19%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 10% of Maryland Bar Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address. By recipient address, 88% of the giving stays in MD; by stated purpose, 85%.

Maryland Bar Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 7.3% directed abroad (not shown)
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

69%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$147k · 3 repeat orgs$67k to everyone else

3 repeat relationships: 3 still active in FY2025, 0 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

3
8

Total granted

$147k
$59k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

-25%
+50%

Still filing today

100%
88%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 73% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $7k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’21’22’23’24’25
Crime & LegalEducationCivil RightsPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MY
    MARYLAND YOUTH AND THE LAW INC
    7× · 2019–2025 · $70k · revenue -25%
  • PB
    PRO BONO RESOURCE CENTER OF MARYLAND INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $61k · revenue +498%
  • TN
    THE NATIONAL JUDICIAL COLLEGE
    2× · 2023–2025 · $16k · revenue -28%

Funded once

  • TT
    THE TAHIRIH JUSTICE CENTERgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $11k · revenue +35%
  • CR
    CONFLICT RESOLUTION CENTER OF BALTIMORE COUNTY INCgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $10k · revenue +105%
  • YO
    YWCA of Annapolis & Anne Arundel County Maryland Inc
    one grant, 2018 · $8k · revenue -4%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Community Law Center Inc

Community law center is maryland's only legal services organization dedicated solely to strengthening neighborhoods and the nonprofit sector. for over 30 years, community law center's attorneys have been providing learning opportunities…

Crime & Legal
2
The Women's Law Center of Md Inc

Our mission is to ensure the physical safety, economic security, and autonomy of women throughout the state. the women's law center of md works towards this goal by providing direct legal representation, information and referral services,…

—
3
Dc Bar Pro Bono Center

The D.C. Bar Pro Bono Center provides free legal services through pro bono lawyers to low-income individuals, nonprofit organizations and small businesses primarily in the District of Columbia. The Pro Bono Center also recruits and trains…

—
4
Public Justice Center Inc

The public justice center (pjc) pursues systemic change to build a just society. (see schedule o)the pjc uses legal advocacy tools to pursue social justice, economic and race equity, and fundamental human rights for people who are…

Crime & Legal
5
Legal Aid Justice Center

The legal aid justice center partners with communities and clients to achieve justice by dismantling systems that create and perpetuate poverty.

Crime & Legal
6
Maryland Legal Services Corporation

To ensure low-income marylanders have access to stable, efficient and effective civil legal assistance through the distribution of funds to nonprofit legal services organizations.

Crime & Legal
7
Legal Aid Bureau Inc

We advocate with and for marylanders experiencing poverty to achieve equity and social justice through free civil legal services, community collaboration, and systems change.

Crime & Legal
8
The District of Columbia Bar Foundation

The district of columbia bar foundation was established to raise funds for organizations in the district that provide hands-on legal services to residents who are unable to afford legal assistance.

Crime & Legal
9
District of Columbia Access to Justice

Work with DC courts, private bar & legal services providers to increase legal representations for low & moderate income DC residents, enhance efficiency of legal services, and reduce barriers to the judicial system.

Crime & Legal
10
Metropolitan Public Defender Services Inc

Our mission is to provide quality representation and zealous advocacy to each client, to conduct our work with professionalism and dignity, and to promote improvement in the administration of justice.

—
11
The Bar Association of Baltimore City

Is an organization of legal professionals committed to providing continuing legal education and services to its members, advocating for its members, promoting professionalism, equality, and diversity, fostering collegiality, advancing the…

—
12
Montgomery County Maryland Bar Foundation Inc

The montgomery county, maryland, bar foundation shall have the specific purpose to organize, operate, and contribute to programs dedicated to the promotion of social welfare, the elimination of prejudice and discrimination, the protection…

Crime & Legal
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Pro Bono Resource Center of Maryland Inc; the most unlike its peers is The United Way of Central Maryland Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 12 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/11
Grantees still filing
7/11
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

MARYLAND YOUTH AND THE LAW INC: $70,336 · OtherMARYLAND YOUTH AND THE LAW INCTHE NATIONAL JUDICIAL COLLEGE: $15,506 · OtherTHE NATIONAL JUDICIAL COLLEGEYWCA of Annapolis & Anne Arundel County Maryland Inc: $8,050 · OtherYWCA of Annapolis & Anne Arundel County Maryland IncBALTIMORE COURT HOUSE & LAW MUSEUM INC: $7,850 · OtherBALTIMORE COURT HOUSE & LAW MUSEUM INCMARYLAND STATE BAR ASSOCIATION INC: $5,300 · OtherPRO BONO RESOURCE CENTER OF MARYLAND INC: $60,900 · Crime & LegalPRO BONO RESOURCE CENTER OF MARYLAND INCCONFLICT RESOLUTION CENTER OF BALTIMORE COUNTY INC: $9,940 · Crime & LegalCONFLICT RESOLUTION CENTER OF BALTIMORE COUN…MARYLAND VOLUNTEER LAWYERS SERVICE INC: $7,000 · Crime & LegalMARYLAND VOLUNTEER LAWYERS SERVICE INCCIVIL JUSTICE INC: $5,000 · Crime & LegalCIVIL JUSTICE INCTHE TAHIRIH JUSTICE CENTER: $11,070 · Civil RightsTHE UNITED WAY OF CENTRAL MARYLAND INC: $7,300 · PhilanthropyFOUNDATION FOR BALTIMORE COUNTY PUBLIC LIBRARY: $5,000 · Education
Other$107,042Crime & Legal$82,840Civil Rights$11,070Philanthropy$7,300Education$5,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetMARYLAND YOUTH AND THE LAW INC: $70,336 over 7y, 6.0% of budgetPRO BONO RESOURCE CENTER OF MARYLAND INC: $60,900 over 9y, 0.9% of budgetTHE NATIONAL JUDICIAL COLLEGE: $15,506 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetTHE TAHIRIH JUSTICE CENTER: $11,070 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCONFLICT RESOLUTION CENTER OF BALTIMORE COUNTY INC: $9,940 over 1y, 2.1% of budgetTHE UNITED WAY OF CENTRAL MARYLAND INC: $7,300 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMARYLAND VOLUNTEER LAWYERS SERVICE INC: $7,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetMARYLAND STATE BAR ASSOCIATION INC: $5,300 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCIVIL JUSTICE INC: $5,000 over 2y, 1.2% of budgetFOUNDATION FOR BALTIMORE COUNTY PUBLIC LIBRARY: $5,000 over 1y, 1.6% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Baltimore Community Foundation IncMD13.4× affinity4 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Baltimore Community Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Maryland Bar Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Maryland Bar Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government →median 11%
  • Conflict Resolution Center of Baltimore County Inc: 72% of income from government
  • Civil Justice Inc: 23% of income from government
  • Pro Bono Resource Center of Maryland Inc: 11% of income from government
  • Maryland Volunteer Lawyers Service Inc: 7% of income from government
  • The United Way of Central Maryland Inc: 2% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
1rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 12 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Maryland Bar’s filings →

More from the funding graph