Skip to content

· Private foundation

Mary Sue Collins Foundation U/A Dated 1/28/2013

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$348k
Granted FY2025still arriving
19
Grants FY2025still arriving
5
States reached
$94k
Largest
01What it funds
0180% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2025.

Education$789kHuman Services$382kInternational$239kReligion$56kAnimals$40kHousing & Shelter$38kFood & Nutrition$31kRecreation & Sports$31kOther$0
02FY2025 · 19 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k13 grants · $72k
  • $10k–50k5 grants · $183k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $94k
$5,531
Median grant
5
States reached
$7.5M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ROANOKE COLLEGE$94,031
VIRGINIA TECH FOUNDATION$49,560
Individual grant recipient$44,250
RESCUE MISSION OF ROANOKE INC$44,250
CHILD FUND INTERNATIONAL$25,001
LOCAL OFFICE ON AGING$19,470
UNICEF$5,531
OXFAM AMERICA$5,531
FERAL$5,531
ADULT CARE CENTER$5,531
HABITAT FOR HUMANITY$5,531
VIRGINIA WESTERN COMM COLLEGE$5,531
Individual grant recipient$5,531
BEST FRIENDS ANIMAL SOCIETY$5,531
FEEDING AMERICA SOUTHWEST VA$5,531
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–25, $252k) land where the poverty rate runs at 20%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%COVENANT HOUSE: $4k → 17%COVENANT HOUSE: $4k → 17%RESCUE MISSION OF ROANOKE INC: $44k → 20%RESCUE MISSION OF ROANOKE INC: $40k → 20%RESCUE MISSION OF ROANOKE INC: $35k → 20%RESCUE MISSION OF ROANOKE INC: $35k → 20%RESCUE MISSION OF ROANOKE INC: $31k → 20%RESCUE MISSION OF ROANOKE INC: $30k → 20%RESCUE MISSION OF ROANOKE INC: $29k → 20%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

NY
MA
UT
MO
VA
MD
DC
GA
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

99%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.7M · 22 repeat orgs$13k to everyone else

22 repeat relationships: 17 still active in FY2025, 5 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

22
2

Total granted

$1.7M
$7k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+34%
+103%

Still filing today

59%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 98% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $6k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
InternationalHuman ServicesAnimalsEducationRecreation & SportsFood & NutritionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TR
    THE RESCUE MISSION OF ROANOKE INC
    7× · 2019–2025 · $244k · revenue +28%
  • CI
    CHILDFUND INTERNATIONAL USA
    7× · 2019–2025 · $138k · revenue +7%
  • LO
    LOCAL OFFICE ON AGING
    7× · 2019–2025 · $108k · revenue +29%

Funded once

  • DO
    DAUGHTERS OF CHARITY OF ST VINCENT DE PAUL
    one grant, 2019 · $4k
  • AC
    Alley Cat Allies Incgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $4k · revenue +103%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
University of Virginia Investment Management Company

The university of virginia investment management company (uvimco) is organized to invest funds on behalf of the rector and visitors of the university of virginia (the university or uva) and university-associated organizations (uaos).

Education
2
University of Virginia Foundation

To provide administrative services to university of virginia (university) entities, university associated organizations, or other entities involved in activities which support the university. to engage in matters pertaining to real…

Education
3
International Aids Vaccine Initiative Inc

A nonprofit scientific research organization that develops vaccines and antibodies for hiv, tuberculosis, and emerging infectious diseases.

International
4
Actionaid Usa

Actionaid is an international network building a just, equitable, and sustainable world in solidarity with communities on the frontlines of poverty and injustice. actionaid usa is the u.s. branch of actionaid international, which works in…

Social Science
5
Waterorg

Water.org's goal is to bring safe water and sanitation to the world through access to small, affordable loans.

International
6
Gavi Alliance

To save lives and protect people's health by increasing equitable and sustainable use of vaccines.

International
7
Food for the Hungry Inc

Food for the hungry is a christian humanitarian aid and global development organization that has designed, developed and delivered solutions for more than 50 years so that children, families and communities can flourish. (continued on…

International
8
Counterpart International Inc

For over 60 years, counterpart international has partnered with communities worldwide to turn local ideas into lasting solutions, connecting local vision with global opportunity. (continued on schedule o)we believe people closest to the…

International
9
Worldwide Vets Incorporated

Our goal is to sustainably improve animal welfare, provide veterinary care, and improve veterinary education globally. in order to achieve this goal, we work in over 10 countries, across 5 continents, supporting local people and animals,…

Animals
10
Feeding San Diego

On a mission to connect every person facing hunger with nutritious meals by maximizing food rescue. through direct service and community partnerships, feeding san diego provides more than 26 million meals each year to children, families,…

Food & Nutrition
11
United States Association for Unhcr

USA for UNHCR protects and supports refugees by mobilizing resources, elevating awareness, and driving action through a network of engaged supporters.

International
12
International Development Enterprises

See schedule o for a more detailed description of ide's mission statement and achievements.

International
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Feeding Southwest Virginia; the most unlike its peers is Kimoyo Ltd. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

15 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 15 of the 26 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
15/15
Grantees still filing
13/15
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

ROANOKE COLLEGE: $515,619 · EducationROANOKE COLLEGEVIRGINIA TECH FOUNDATION INC: $254,472 · EducationVIRGINIA TECH FOUNDATION INCIndividual grant recipient: $244,350 · OtherIndividual grant recipientIndividual grant recipient: $30,544 · OtherIndividual grant recipientIndividual grant recipient: $30,544 · OtherIndividual grant recipientFERAL: $30,543 · OtherFERALTRI-RIVER HABITAT FOR HUMANITY INC: $30,543 · OtherTRI-RIVER HABITAT FOR HUMAN…DAUGHTERS OF CHARITY EMMITSBURG MD: $26,918 · OtherDAUGHTERS OF CHARITY EMMITS…ROANOKE ANGELS OF ASSISI: $25,013 · OtherTHE SALVATION ARMY NATIONAL CAPITAL & VIRGINIA DIVISION - DHQ: $19,200 · OtherVIRGINIA WESTERN COMM COLLEGE: $18,794 · Other+3 more: $19,700 · OtherTHE RESCUE MISSION OF ROANOKE INC: $244,350 · Human ServicesTHE RESCUE MISSION O…LOCAL OFFICE ON AGING: $107,514 · Human ServicesLOCAL OFFICE ON AGIN…+1 more: $7,375 · Human ServicesCHILDFUND INTERNATIONAL USA: $138,057 · InternationalCHILDFUND INT…UNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF: $30,544 · InternationalUNITED STATES…OXFAM-AMERICA INC: $30,544 · InternationalOXFAM-AMERICA…KIMOYO LTD: $20,000 · InternationalKIMOYO LTDCOOPERATIVE FOR ASSISTANCE AND RELIEF EVERYWHERE INC: $20,000 · InternationalCOOPERATIVE F…BEST FRIENDS ANIMAL SOCIETY: $30,543 · AnimalsAlley Cat Allies Inc: $3,625 · AnimalsNATIONAL D-DAY MEMORIAL FOUNDATION: $30,543 · Recreation & SportsFEEDING SOUTHWEST VIRGINIA: $30,543 · Food & Nutrition
Education$770,091Other$476,149Human Services$359,239International$239,145Animals$34,168Recreation & Sports$30,543Food & Nutrition$30,543

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetROANOKE COLLEGE: $515,619 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetVIRGINIA TECH FOUNDATION INC: $254,472 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetTHE RESCUE MISSION OF ROANOKE INC: $244,350 over 7y, 0.7% of budgetCHILDFUND INTERNATIONAL USA: $138,057 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetLOCAL OFFICE ON AGING: $107,514 over 7y, 0.5% of budgetUNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF: $30,544 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetOXFAM-AMERICA INC: $30,544 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL D-DAY MEMORIAL FOUNDATION: $30,543 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetFEEDING SOUTHWEST VIRGINIA: $30,543 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetBEST FRIENDS ANIMAL SOCIETY: $30,543 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetTRI-RIVER HABITAT FOR HUMANITY INC: $30,543 over 7y, 34% of budgetKIMOYO LTD: $20,000 over 5y, 5.8% of budgetCOOPERATIVE FOR ASSISTANCE AND RELIEF EVERYWHERE INC: $20,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetCOVENANT HOUSE: $7,375 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAlley Cat Allies Inc: $3,625 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds ROANOKE COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds VIRGINIA TECH FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds THE RESCUE MISSION OF ROANOKE INC ↗
  • Who funds CHILDFUND INTERNATIONAL USA ↗
  • Who funds LOCAL OFFICE ON AGING ↗
  • Who funds UNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF ↗
  • Who funds OXFAM-AMERICA INC ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL D-DAY MEMORIAL FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds FEEDING SOUTHWEST VIRGINIA ↗
  • Who funds BEST FRIENDS ANIMAL SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds TRI-RIVER HABITAT FOR HUMANITY INC ↗
  • Who funds KIMOYO LTD ↗
  • Who funds COOPERATIVE FOR ASSISTANCE AND RELIEF EVERYWHERE INC ↗
  • Who funds COVENANT HOUSE ↗
  • Who funds Alley Cat Allies Inc ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a set of overlaps that mostly run through this funder rather than between each other.

Amazonsmile FoundationWA2.7× affinity4 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Mary Sue Collins Foundation U/A Dated 1/28/2013 funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Mary Sue Collins Foundation U/A Dated 1/28/2013. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%3%10%23%40%funder's share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Oxfam-America Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Mary Sue Collins Foundation U/A Dated 1/28/2013?

Find your warmest path to Mary Sue Collins Foundation U/A Dated 1/28/2013 through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 26 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Mary Sue Collins Foundation U/A Dated 1/28/2013’s filings →

More from the funding graph