Skip to content
Mary Jane H & Peter J Dapuzzo Family Foundation at a glance

· Private foundation

Mary Jane H & Peter J Dapuzzo Family Foundation

Its FY2023 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$31k
Granted FY2023
3
Grants FY2023
2
States reached
$25k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
0194% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2023.

Education$71kHealth$40kPublic Benefit$29kHuman Services$21kInternational$19kPhilanthropy$13kHousing & Shelter$1kFood & Nutrition$1kOther$0
02FY2023 · 3 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2023

  • Under $10k2 grants · $6k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $25k
$5,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
GREENWICH HOSP$25,000
MAUI UNITED WAY$5,000
PEHT$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–19, $1k) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%COVENANT HOUSE: $1k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

NY
CT
CA
CO
MO
TN
HI
OK
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

88%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$174k · 13 repeat orgs$25k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +22% since the first grant, against +1% for those funded once.

13 repeat relationships: 1 still active in FY2023, 12 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2023 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

13
7

Total granted

$174k
$19k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+22%
+1%

Still filing today

69%
71%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2023, 81% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $6k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23
InternationalCivil RightsHealthEducationPhilanthropyPublic BenefitOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • GH
    GREENWICH HOSPITAL
    3× · 2018–2023 · $30k · revenue +49%
  • KI
    KIDS IN CRISIS INC
    2× · 2017–2019 · $8k · revenue +76%
  • TREVOR PROJECT INC
    3× · 2020–2022 · $6k · revenue +189%

Funded once

  • AM
    AMERICAN MILITARY FAMILY INCgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $7k · revenue +103%
  • UW
    UNITED WAY OF ULSTER COUNTY INC
    3× · 2020–2022 · $3k · revenue -25%
  • G
    GEMS
    3× · 2020–2022 · $3k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Childfund International Usa

Childfund's mission is to help deprived, excluded and vulnerable children have the capacity to become young adults, parents and leaders who bring lasting and positive change to their communities, and to promote societies whose individuals…

International
2
Management Sciences for Health Inc

(msh) saves lives and improves the health of the world's poorest (see schedule o) and most vulnerable people by closing the gap between knowledge and action in public health.

International
3
Youth First

Youth first strengthens youth and families by delivering evidence-based, school-based prevention and early intervention programs that address youth mental health needs, promote healthy behaviors, prevent substance use, and support student…

Health
4
We Are Family Foundation

The we are family foundation celebrates the vision of a global family by creating and supporting programs that inspire and educate people about mutual respect, understanding and appreciation of cultural diversity.

Civil Rights
5
Jobsfirstnyc

Jobsfirstnyc's mission is to create and advance solutions that break down barriers and transform the systems supporting young adults and their communities in the pursuit of economic opportunities.

Youth Development
6
International Youth Foundation

Iyf is a global ngo that prepares young people to be healthy, productive and engaged citizens.

International
7
Sesame Workshop

Sesame workshop's mission is to help kids grow smarter, stronger and kinder. (see schedule o)

Arts & Culture
8
The Children's Aid Society

Children's aid helps children in poverty to succeed and thrive. we do this by providing comprehensive supports to children and their families in targeted, high-needs new york city neighborhoods. (continued on schedule o)continuation of…

Human Services
9
New York University

Nyu is a private university with approximately 60,000 matriculating students in 20 schools and institutes. nyu's primary missions are education, research and scholarship, and patient care.

Education
10
Third Way

To research and develop centrist policy ideas.

Civil Rights
11
Women's Refugee Commission Inc

To improve the lives and protect the rights of women, children and youth displaced by conflict and crisis. the women's refugee commission envisions a world in which refugees are safe, healthy and reliant and seeks to drive change in…

Human Services
12
United Way for Greater Austin

United way for greater austin brings our community together to break economic barriers and build opportunity for all.

Philanthropy
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Save the Children Federation Inc; the most unlike its peers is Greenwich Hospital. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

15 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 15 of the 22 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
15/15
Grantees still filing
9/15
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

HORIZONS AT BRUNSWICH SCHOOL: $41,000 · OtherHORIZONS AT BRUNSWICH SCHOOLVETERANS COMM PROJECT: $29,000 · OtherVETERANS COMM PROJECTKIDS IN CRISIS INC: $8,000 · OtherKIDS IN CRISIS INCKIDS IN CRISIS INC: $6,000 · OtherKIDS IN CRISIS INCUNITED WAY OF GREENWICH INC: $5,000 · Other+4 more: $8,500 · Other+4 moreGREENWICH HOSPITAL: $30,000 · HealthGREENWICH HOSPITALST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $3,500 · HealthST JUDE CHILDREN'S …LITWORLD INTERNATIONAL INC: $16,000 · InternationalLITWORLD IN…Save The Children Federation Inc: $2,500 · InternationalSave The Ch…FEED THE CHILDREN INC: $1,000 · InternationalGLSEN INC: $12,000 · Civil RightsGLSEN INCTREVOR PROJECT INC: $6,000 · Civil RightsTREVOR PRO…WATERSIDE SCHOOL INC: $9,500 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF DENVER: $5,000 · EducationMAUI UNITED WAY: $5,000 · PhilanthropyUNITED WAY OF ULSTER COUNTY INC: $2,500 · PhilanthropyAMERICAN MILITARY FAMILY INC: $7,000 · Public BenefitCOVENANT HOUSE: $1,045 · Human Services
Other$97,500Health$33,500International$19,500Civil Rights$18,000Education$14,500Philanthropy$7,500Public Benefit$7,000Human Services$1,045

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetGREENWICH HOSPITAL: $30,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetLITWORLD INTERNATIONAL INC: $16,000 over 6y, 0.3% of budgetGLSEN INC: $12,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetWATERSIDE SCHOOL INC: $9,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetKIDS IN CRISIS INC: $8,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetTREVOR PROJECT INC: $6,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED WAY OF GREENWICH INC: $5,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF DENVER: $5,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMAUI UNITED WAY: $5,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $3,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED WAY OF ULSTER COUNTY INC: $2,500 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetSave The Children Federation Inc: $2,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCOVENANT HOUSE: $1,045 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFEED THE CHILDREN INC: $1,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds GREENWICH HOSPITAL ↗
  • Who funds LITWORLD INTERNATIONAL INC ↗
  • Who funds GLSEN INC ↗
  • Who funds WATERSIDE SCHOOL INC ↗
  • Who funds KIDS IN CRISIS INC ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN MILITARY FAMILY INC ↗
  • Who funds TREVOR PROJECT INC ↗
  • Who funds UNITED WAY OF GREENWICH INC ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF DENVER ↗
  • Who funds MAUI UNITED WAY ↗
  • Who funds ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC ↗
  • Who funds UNITED WAY OF ULSTER COUNTY INC ↗
  • Who funds Save The Children Federation Inc ↗
  • Who funds COVENANT HOUSE ↗
  • Who funds FEED THE CHILDREN INC ↗

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Mary Jane H & Peter J Dapuzzo Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Mary Jane H & Peter J Dapuzzo Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%15%30%45%60%share of the org’s income from government →median 30%
  • Kids in Crisis Inc: 49% of income from government
  • Save the Children Federation Inc: 30% of income from government
  • Feed the Children Inc: 1% of income from government
  • Greenwich Hospital: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–60%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 22 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2023, released 2023. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Mary Jane H & Peter J Dapuzzo Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home