Skip to content

· Private foundation

Mary Elizabeth Avinger Charitable Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$106k
Granted FY2024still arriving
15
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$20k
Largest
01What it funds
0193% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Education$143kHuman Services$138kHealth$76kReligion$67kHousing & Shelter$58kArts & Culture$21kRecreation & Sports$21kAnimals$1kOther$0
02FY2024 · 15 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k10 grants · $31k
  • $10k–50k5 grants · $75k
$5,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$1.2M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SC SCHOOL FOR THE DEAF & BLIND$20,000
EPWORTH CHILDREN'S HOME$20,000
ORANGEBURG CALHOUN FREE MEDICAL$15,000
ORANGEBURG COUNCIL ON AGING$10,000
EDISTO HABITAT FOR HUMANITY$10,000
ORANGEBURG PREPARATORY SCHOOL$8,000
FELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIAN ATHLETES$5,000
ST ANDREWS METHODIST CHURCH$5,000
COOPERATIVE CHURCH MINISTRIES OF$4,000
ORANGEBURG HISTORICAL SOCIETY$3,000
Individual grant recipient$2,000
WINTHROP UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION$1,000
SC UNITED METHODIST FOUNDATION$1,000
SALVATION ARMY$1,000
THE REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY24–24, $10k) land where the poverty rate runs at 25%, against an area that typically sits at 14%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 14%ORANGEBURG COUNCIL ON AGING: $10k → 25%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

96%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$519k · 15 repeat orgs$20k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +85% since the first grant, against -37% for those funded once.

15 repeat relationships: 13 still active in FY2024, 2 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

15
1

Total granted

$519k
$1k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+85%
-37%

Still filing today

53%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 82% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $19k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’24
Human ServicesEducationYouth DevelopmentHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • EC
    EPWORTH CHILDREN'S HOME
    7× · 2017–2024 · $81k · revenue +177%
  • OC
    ORANGEBURG COUNTY COUNCIL ON AGING
    7× · 2017–2024 · $50k · revenue +10%
  • OP
    ORANGEBURG PREPARATORY SCHOOLS INC
    7× · 2017–2024 · $48k · revenue +20%

Funded once

  • HS
    HEALING SPECIES INC
    one grant, 2018 · $1k · revenue -37%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Educational Foundation South Carolina Bankers Association

To aid banking education by providing scholarships to college students.

—
2
South Carolina Episcopal Home at Still Hopes

To provide a faith based community where life will be rich and full as god intends it to be, holding to our values, serving one another with dedication and promoting health and wellness for all.

Health
3
Health Care Partners of South Carolina Inc

The organization provides health care to individuals regardless of their ability to pay. this is a direct fulfillment of their tax exempt purpose.

Health
4
Columbia College

Columbia college provides educational opportunities that develop students' capacity for critical thought and expression, life-long learning, acceptance of personal responsibilty, and commitment to service and social justice.

Education
5
Oxford Preparatory School Inc

Operation of a public charter school

Education
6
University of South Carolina School of Medicine Educational Trust

The educational trust operates exclusively for the benefit of, and to carry out the purposes of, the university of south carolina school of medicine and the greater university of south carolina. its main purposes are to augment and aid…

Education
7
United Church of Christ Homes Inc

In the spirit of christ's love, the ministry of united church of christ homes is to provide care and service to elders through acts of love and compassion.

Human Services
8
South Carolina Network of Children's Advocacy Centers

Empowering south carolina communities and children's advocacy centers to deliver a best practice response to child abuse

Youth Development
9
Eastern Carolina Community Foundation

The Eastern Carolina Community Foundation improves the quality of life in this area of South Carolina through inspired philanthropy and innovative community programs.

Philanthropy
10
Williamsburg Regional Hospital

Williamsburg regional hospital is a not for profit acute care hospital with 25 licensed beds, providing excellence in patient care in an environment that is respectful of others, adaptive to change, accountable for outcomes, and attentive…

Health
11
Ouachita Baptist University

Ouachita baptist university is a christ-centered learning community. embracing the liberal arts tradition, the university prepares individuals for ongoing intellectual and spiritual growth, lives of meaningful work, and reasoned engagement…

Education
12
Conway Hospital Community Services

Conway hospital community services provides outpatient health care services to horry county and the surrounding community in conjunction with conway hospital, inc., a non-profit acute care hospital system.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Winthrop University Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Orangeburg Calhoun Free Medical Clinic Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 18 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/10
Grantees still filing
6/10
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

SCSDB FOUNDATION: $88,000 · OtherSCSDB FOUNDATIONEDISTO HABITAT FOR HUMANITY INTERNATIONAL INC: $58,000 · OtherEDISTO HABITAT FOR HUMANITY INTERNATIONAL INCORANGEBURG CALHOUN FREE CLINIC: $53,000 · OtherORANGEBURG CALHOUN FREE CLINICST ANDREWS METHODIST CHURCH: $40,000 · OtherST ANDREWS METHODIST CHURCHORANGEBURG HISTORICAL SOCIETY: $21,000 · OtherORANGEBURG HISTORICAL SOCIETYCOOPERATIVE CHURCH MINISTRIES: $16,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $14,000 · Other+4 more: $26,000 · Other+4 moreEPWORTH CHILDREN'S HOME: $81,000 · Human ServicesEPWORTH CHILDREN'S HOMEORANGEBURG COUNTY COUNCIL ON AGING: $50,000 · Human ServicesORANGEBURG COUNTY COUNCIL O…+1 more: $1,000 · Human ServicesORANGEBURG PREPARATORY SCHOOLS INC: $48,000 · EducationORANGEBURG …Winthrop University Foundation: $7,000 · EducationWinthrop Un…FELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIAN ATHLETES: $21,000 · Youth DevelopmentORANGEBURG CALHOUN FREE MEDICAL CLINIC INC: $15,000 · Health
Other$316,000Human Services$132,000Education$55,000Youth Development$21,000Health$15,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetSCSDB FOUNDATION: $88,000 over 7y, 2.7% of budgetEPWORTH CHILDREN'S HOME: $81,000 over 7y, 0.2% of budgetEDISTO HABITAT FOR HUMANITY INTERNATIONAL INC: $58,000 over 7y, 2.0% of budgetORANGEBURG COUNTY COUNCIL ON AGING: $50,000 over 7y, 1.1% of budgetORANGEBURG PREPARATORY SCHOOLS INC: $48,000 over 7y, 0.2% of budgetFELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIAN ATHLETES: $21,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetORANGEBURG CALHOUN FREE MEDICAL CLINIC INC: $15,000 over 1y, 4.8% of budgetWinthrop University Foundation: $7,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetSOUTH CAROLINA UNITED METHODIST FOUNDATION INC: $7,000 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetHEALING SPECIES INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds SCSDB FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds EPWORTH CHILDREN'S HOME ↗
  • Who funds EDISTO HABITAT FOR HUMANITY INTERNATIONAL INC ↗
  • Who funds ORANGEBURG COUNTY COUNCIL ON AGING ↗
  • Who funds ORANGEBURG PREPARATORY SCHOOLS INC ↗
  • Who funds FELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIAN ATHLETES ↗
  • Who funds ORANGEBURG CALHOUN FREE MEDICAL CLINIC INC ↗
  • Who funds Winthrop University Foundation ↗
  • Who funds SOUTH CAROLINA UNITED METHODIST FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds HEALING SPECIES INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Central Carolina Community FoundationSC17.5× affinity6 shared granteesties to 5 of 5Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Central Carolina Community Foundation · Spartanburg County Foundation · Albemarle Foundation · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Mary Elizabeth Avinger Charitable Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Mary Elizabeth Avinger Charitable Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 18 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Mary Elizabeth Avinger’s filings →

    More from the funding graph