· Private foundation
Mary Brickell Circle of King's Daughters
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).
A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 67% of MARY BRICKELL CIRCLE OF KING'S DAUGHTERS’s grantee dollars fall outside its nine largest cause areas, whether because the recipient carries no IRS cause code or because its cause sits in the long tail. A chart would be mostly one residual band and misrepresent the portfolio.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k13 grants · $44k
- $10k–50k2 grants · $63k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| MARTHA COKER HOME CO METHODIST SENIOR SERVICES | $34,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $29,300 |
| MANNA HOUSE | $8,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $5,000 |
| YAZOO COUNTY CANCER FUND | $5,000 |
| MY BROTHER'S KEEPER | $5,000 |
| RICKS MEMORIAL LIBRARY - YAZOO LIBRARY ASSOCIATION | $5,000 |
| YAZOO CITY MINISTERIAL ASSOCIATION | $4,000 |
| SCHOLARSHIP - ANNA KATE GRIFFIN | $2,000 |
| SCHOLARSHIP - KIMBERLY LOVE | $2,000 |
| SCHOLARSHIP - MERRILL NICHOLS | $2,000 |
| SCHOLARSHIP - BAILEE BELLIPANI | $2,000 |
| SCHOLARSHIP - ANNA RILEY GREY | $2,000 |
| SCHOLARSHIP - IVY SOWELL | $2,000 |
| DESIGN OUTREACH | $200 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY19–22, $30k) land where the poverty rate runs at 37%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Where the work is directed
The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.
About 58% of Mary Brickell Circle of King's Daughters’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another. Read by recipient address, 95% of the giving stays in MS; read by stated purpose it is 39% — less of the work is directed home than the recipients' locations suggest.
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
18 repeat relationships — 8 still active in FY2025, 10 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 86% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $15k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- MCMARTHA COKER HOME INC4× · 2022–2025 · $87k · revenue +16%
- MBMy Brother's Keeper Inc5× · 2019–2025 · $36k · revenue +3%
- GGRACEWATER3× · 2019–2022 · $30k · revenue +149%
Funded once
- CMCHRISTIAN MISSIONS IN MANY LANDS INCone grant, 2022 · $10k
- IGIndividual grant recipientone grant, 2023 · $4k
- CMCHRISTIAN MISSIONS IN MANY LANDSone grant, 2024 · $4k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To encourage and demonstrate grace in the body of christ across racial lines, so that communities throughout mississippi can see practical evidence of the gospel message.
To connect and coordinate united methodist volunteers and their christian friends with persons in need of humanitarian assistance and spiritual encouragement.
To provide aid to the community for those in need of food, clothing, etc.
Kingdom Gospel Mission is a Christian church related missionary organization. Our focus is and has been Christian education, outreach, starting churches and relief oriented work mostly overseas, and especially where we are currently based…
World Outreach USA is a mission agency, which means we are a ministry organizaton that exists to facilitate Christian missionary endeavours, including Evangelism, Discipleship and church planting.
To provide food and clothing to those in need
Proclaim the gospel of jesus christ
To provide safe and affordable housing, care and programs for the mental and spiritual wellbeing of the elderly, including low income residents, and church support.
Mission myanmar, inc. is dedicated to spreading the gospel of christ throughout myanmar. the primary purpose is to promote and foster growth through church planting, evangelist training, and caring for persecuted children. the mission…
Manna of life ministries, inc. is a non-for-profit faith based program dedicated to serving the homeless and destitute. our goal is to address their immediate hunger needs and ultimately, to emplower them to reverse their current situation.
Christian Evangelism
Promote Gods word through understanding the Bible
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Martha Coker Home Inc and the most unlike its peers is Yazoo Library Association. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 33 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds MARTHA COKER HOME INC ↗
- Who funds MANNA HOUSE INC 323 N MAIN ST ↗
- Who funds My Brother's Keeper Inc ↗
- Who funds GRACEWATER ↗
- Who funds INTERNATIONAL ORDER OF THE KING'S DAUGHTERS & SONS ↗
- Who funds Yazoo City Ministerial Association ↗
- Who funds Yazoo Library Association ↗
- Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF THE MISSISSIPPI DELTA ↗
- Who funds DESIGN OUTREACH INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Mary Brickell Circle of King's Daughters funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Mary Brickell Circle of King's Daughters?
Find your warmest path to Mary Brickell Circle of King's Daughters through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.