Skip to content

· Private foundation

Marvin W Richter Charitable Trust

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$329k
Granted FY2025still arriving
15
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$200k
Largest
01What it funds
0194% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2025.

Public Benefit$251kEducation$85kReligion$73kArts & Culture$36kPublic Safety & Disaster$35kCommunity Improvement$24kFood & Nutrition$18kHealth$16kOther$0
02FY2025 · 15 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k9 grants · $20k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $57k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $252k
$2,500
Median grant
2
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CITY OF PITTSFIELD$200,000
JOHN WOOD COMMUNITY COLLEGE$51,865
CALHOUN COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIETY$22,000
PLEASANT HILL IL FIRE DEPARTMENT$12,500
Individual grant recipient$12,500
VILLAGE OF KAMPSVILLE IL$10,000
PIKE COUNTY IL ANIMAL SHELTER$5,209
ST NORBERT CATHOLIC CHURCH$2,500
PLEASANT HILL 4H CLUB$2,500
SHRINERS HOSPITAL$2,500
UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS EXTENSION$2,500
VILLAGE OF HULL IL$2,000
MISSISSIPPI VALLEY CHRISTIAN SERV$2,000
AMERICAN RED CROSS$750
PIKE COUNTY IL CRIME STOPPERS$500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY18–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 85% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%SHRINERS HOSPITAL: $3k → 13%VILLAGE OF KAMPSVILLE IL: $10k → 10%JOHN WOOD COMMUNITY COLLEGE: $52k → 13%CITY OF PITTSFIELD: $200k → 17%SHRINERS HOSPITAL: $3k → 13%VILLAGE OF KAMPSVILLE IL: $5k → 10%JOHN WOOD COMMUNITY COLLEGE: $15k → 13%PITTSFIELD FIRE DEPARTMENT: $13k → 17%VILLAGE OF KAMPSVILLE IL: $4k → 10%PITTSFIELD UNITED METHODIST CHURCH: $10k → 17%VILLAGE OF KAMPSVILLE IL: $4k → 10%PITTSFIELD UNITED METHODIST CHURCH: $10k → 17%VILLAGE OF KAMPSVILLE IL: $4k → 10%PITTSFIELD UNITED METHODIST CHURCH: $10k → 17%VILLAGE OF KAMPSVILLE IL: $4k → 10%PITTSFIELD UNITED METHODIST CHURCH: $9k → 17%VILLAGE OF KAMPSVILLE: $3k → 10%PITTSFIELD UNITED METHODIST CHURCH: $9k → 17%VILLAGE OF KAMPSVILLE IL: $3k → 10%PITTSFIELD UNITED METHODIST CHURCH: $7k → 17%CALHOUN COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIETY: $22k → 10%PIKE COUNTY IL ANIMAL SHELTER: $5k → 17%ST NORBERT CATHOLIC CHURCH: $5k → 10%MISSISSIPPI VALLEY CHRISTIAN SERV: $3k → 17%ST NORBERT CATHOLIC CHURCH: $5k → 10%PITTSFIELD FIRE DEPARTMENT: $3k → 17%ST NORBERT CATHOLIC CHURCH: $3k → 10%MISSISSIPPI VALLEY CHRISTIAN SERV: $3k → 17%MISSISSIPPI VALLEY CHRISTIAN SERV: $3k → 17%PITTSFIELD FIRE DEPARTMENT: $3k → 17%UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS EXTENSION: $3k → 17%PITTSFIELD FIRE DEPARTMENT: $3k → 17%PLEASANT HILL 4H CLUB: $4k → 17%PLEASANT HILL 4H CLUB: $3k → 17%VILLAGE OF HULL IL: $3k → 17%VILLAGE OF HULL IL: $3k → 17%VILLAGE OF HULL: $3k → 17%VILLAGE OF HULL IL: $3k → 17%PLEASANT HILL IL FIRE DEPARTMENT: $13k → 17%PLEASANT HILL COMMUNITY CLUB INC: $12k → 17%PLEASANT HILL COMMUNITY CLUB INC: $7k → 17%AMERICAN LEGION POST 1048: $5k → 17%PLEASANT HILL UNITED METHODIST CHUR: $5k → 17%PLEASANT HILL COMMUNITY CLUB INC: $5k → 17%PLEASANT HILL FIRE DEPARTMENT: $3k → 17%PLEASANT HILL IL FIRE DEPARTMENT: $3k → 17%PLEASANT HILL IL FIRE DEPARTMENT: $3k → 17%PLEASANT HILL IL FIRE DEPARTMENT: $3k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

61%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$358k · 16 repeat orgs$226k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +94% since the first grant, against -47% for those funded once.

16 repeat relationships: 13 still active in FY2025, 3 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

16
7

Total granted

$358k
$21k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+94%
-47%

Still filing today

13%
14%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 38% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $205k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthFood & NutritionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • JW
    JOHN WOOD COMMUNITY COLLEGE
    4× · 2019–2025 · $68k
  • PU
    PITTSFIELD UNITED METHODIST CHURCH
    6× · 2018–2023 · $55k
  • TC
    THE CALHOUN COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIETY
    8× · 2018–2025 · $36k

Funded once

  • PH
    PLEASANT HILL UNITED METHODIST CHUR
    one grant, 2024 · $5k
  • AL
    AMERICAN LEGION POST 1048
    one grant, 2021 · $5k
  • PH
    PLEASANT HILL FIRE DEPARTMENT
    one grant, 2018 · $3k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field
04the grantee network

3 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 3 of the 25 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
3/3
Grantees still filing
1/3
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CITY OF PITTSFIELD: $200,000 · OtherCITY OF PITTSFIELDJOHN WOOD COMMUNITY COLLEGE: $67,865 · OtherJOHN WOOD COMMUNITY COLLEGEPITTSFIELD UNITED METHODIST CHURCH: $55,000 · OtherPITTSFIELD UNITED METHODIST CHURCHTHE CALHOUN COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIETY: $36,000 · OtherTHE CALHOUN COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIETYVILLAGE OF KAMPSVILLE IL: $33,500 · OtherVILLAGE OF KAMPSVILLE ILPLEASANT HILL IL FIRE DEPARTMENT: $27,500 · OtherPLEASANT HILL COMMUNITY CLUB INC: $24,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $20,500 · Other+15 more: $100,459 · Other+15 moreSHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDREN: $15,000 · HealthTWO RIVERS FARM BUREAU FOUNDATION: $3,500 · Food & Nutrition
Other$564,824Health$15,000Food & Nutrition$3,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetSHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDREN: $15,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetILLINI COMMUNITY HEALTH CARE FOUNDATION: $1,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds SHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDREN ↗
  • Who funds TWO RIVERS FARM BUREAU FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds ILLINI COMMUNITY HEALTH CARE FOUNDATION ↗

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Marvin W Richter Charitable Trust funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Marvin W Richter Charitable Trust. Bigger dots raise more.

2023
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Shriners Hospitals for Children: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 25 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Marvin W Richter’s filings →

More from the funding graph