Skip to content
Plinth

· Charitable trust

Marvin S Robinson Charitable Trust

None

$3.3M
Granted FY2025still arriving
8
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$1.8M
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172025.

Education$7.0MPhilanthropy$3.1MArts & Culture$615kHealth$270kFood & Nutrition$250kCivil Rights$200kReligion$150kCommunity Improvement$50kOther$0
02FY2025 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k3 grants · $30k
  • $50k–250k3 grants · $335k
  • $250k+2 grants · $3.0M
$100,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$21M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
KANSAS STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION$1,750,000
GREATER MANHATTAN COMMUNITY FOUNDATION$1,210,397
FLINT HILLS CHRISTIAN SCHOOL$185,000
CORNERSTONE FAMILY COUNSELING$100,000
MEADOWLARK HILLS FOUNDATION$50,000
THE KANSAS RURAL COMMUNITIES FOUNDATION$10,000
THE MANHATTAN CHAMBER FOUNDATION$10,000
PAWNEE MENTAL HEALTH FOUNDATION$10,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY20–20, $5k) land where the poverty rate runs at 20%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%SHEPHERD'S CROSSING: $5k → 20%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

84%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$7.2M · 6 repeat orgs$1.4M to everyone else

6 repeat relationships — 4 still active in FY2025, 2 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

6
10

Total granted

$7.2M
$1.3M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+19%
+27%

Still filing today

83%
90%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 97% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $60k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationPhilanthropyHealthArts & CultureFood & NutritionReligionOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • KS
    KANSAS STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION
    8× · 2017–2025 · $5.9M · revenue +107%
  • FH
    FLINT HILLS CHRISTIAN SCHOOL INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $794k · revenue +143%
  • CF
    CORNERSTONE FAMILY COUNSELING INC
    2× · 2022–2025 · $200k · revenue +19%

Funded once

  • WH
    WAREHAM HALL RENOVATION FUNDgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $500k · revenue +207%
  • FB
    FLINTHILLS BREADBASKET INCgraduated
    one grant, 2024 · $250k · revenue +50%
  • NS
    NO STONE UNTURNED FOUNDATION INC
    one grant, 2023 · $200k · revenue -5%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Kansas Methodist Foundation Inc

Receive gifts, bequests and donations to be held in trust to invest and administer for charitable, religious and educational use to maintain and further the programs and missions of the united methodist church and churches related to the…

Religion
2
Greater Kansas City Community Foundation

The Greater Kansas City Community Foundation's mission is to improve the quality of life in Greater Kansas City by increasing charitable giving, educating and connecting donors to community needs they care about, and leading on critical…

Philanthropy
3
Central Kansas Community Foundation

Building stronger communities through charitable giving.

Philanthropy
4
Community Foundation of Southeast Kansas

The Community Foundation of Southeast Kansas servces the region by encouraging charitable giving benefiting the common good and the quality of life.

Philanthropy
5
Western Kansas Community Foundation

Enriching western Kansas life through philanthropy, collaboration and leadership.

Philanthropy
6
Kansas Food Bank Foundation Inc

To serve as a fundraising and support organization for the kansas foodbank warehouse, inc.

Food & Nutrition
7
Kansas Wesleyan University Foundation

The foundation is organized to secure gifts of money or property in efforts of advancing education and/or research; therefore, providing assistance in furthering the mission of kansas wesleyan university.

Education
8
First United Methodist Church of Manhattan Ks Inc Foundation

Support of first united methodist church of manhattan, ks inc.

9
Washburn University Charitable Gift Fund

To strengthen the university and communities that have touched the lives of wu alumni and friends, the mission of the washburn university charitable gift fund is to receive and administer gifts and bequests to further the charitable…

Education
10
Labette County Medical Center

We are dedicated to providing exceptional healthcare - centered around you.

Health
11
Kansas Healthcare Collaborative Inc

Engaging and aligning providers and stakeholders to establish Kansas as a role model for health care quality and a top performer in health care outcomes.

Health
12
Manchester Mental Health Foundation

To raise and maintain funds to support mental health care for persons in the Greater Manchester, NH area.

Health

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Greater Manhattan Community Foundation and the most unlike its peers is INNOVATE24 Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

18 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 18 of the 20 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
18/18
Grantees still filing
12/18
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

KANSAS STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION — $5,906,800 · EducationKANSAS STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATIONFLINT HILLS CHRISTIAN SCHOOL INC — $793,860 · EducationFLINT HILLS CHRISTIAN SCHOOL INCManhattan Area Technical College Foundation — $300,000 · Education+1 more — $40,000 · EducationGREATER MANHATTAN COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $3,021,372 · PhilanthropyGREATER MANHATTAN COMMUNITY FOUNDATI…WAREHAM HALL RENOVATION FUND — $500,000 · PhilanthropyWAREHAM HALL RENOVATION FUNDNO STONE UNTURNED FOUNDATION INC — $200,000 · Philanthropy+1 more — $50,000 · PhilanthropyFLINTHILLS BREADBASKET INC — $250,000 · Food & NutritionCORNERSTONE FAMILY COUNSELING INC — $200,000 · Civil RightsBE ABLE INC — $140,000 · ReligionOZ MUSEUM - COLUMBIAN THEATRE FOUNDATION INC — $100,000 · Arts & CultureThe Children's Mercy Hospital Foundation — $50,000 · HealthPAWNEE MENTAL HEALTH FOUNDATION — $20,000 · HealthTHE KANSAS RURAL COMMUNITIES FOUNDATION — $30,000 · OtherMANHATTAN CHAMBER FOUNDATION — $10,000 · OtherFLINT HILLS PRAISEFEST INC — $15,000 · OtherHOMESTEAD MINISTRIES INC — $5,000 · OtherYOUNG LIFE — $9,500 · OtherSHEPHERD'S CROSSING — $5,000 · Other
Education$7,040,660Philanthropy$3,771,372Food & Nutrition$250,000Civil Rights$200,000Religion$140,000Arts & Culture$100,000Health$70,000Other$74,500

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetKANSAS STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION — $5,906,800 over 8y, 0.9% of budgetGREATER MANHATTAN COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $3,021,372 over 6y, 1.9% of budgetFLINT HILLS CHRISTIAN SCHOOL INC — $793,860 over 9y, 8.6% of budgetWAREHAM HALL RENOVATION FUND — $500,000 over 1y, 15% of budgetFLINTHILLS BREADBASKET INC — $250,000 over 1y, 6.7% of budgetCORNERSTONE FAMILY COUNSELING INC — $200,000 over 2y, 8.7% of budgetNO STONE UNTURNED FOUNDATION INC — $200,000 over 1y, 4.8% of budgetBE ABLE INC — $140,000 over 1y, 19% of budgetOZ MUSEUM - COLUMBIAN THEATRE FOUNDATION INC — $100,000 over 1y, 9.2% of budgetMEADOWLARK HILLS FOUNDATION — $50,000 over 1y, 2.5% of budgetThe Children's Mercy Hospital Foundation — $50,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetINNOVATE24 INC — $40,000 over 1y, 80% of budgetTHE KANSAS RURAL COMMUNITIES FOUNDATION — $30,000 over 3y, 0.8% of budgetPAWNEE MENTAL HEALTH FOUNDATION — $20,000 over 2y, 1.7% of budgetMANHATTAN CHAMBER FOUNDATION — $10,000 over 1y, 26% of budgetYOUNG LIFE — $9,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Greater Manhattan Community FoundationKS30.3× affinity12 shared granteesties to 4 of 4Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Greater Manhattan Community Foundation · Memorial Hospital Association Inc · Manhattan Fund - Caroline F Peine Charitable · Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Marvin S Robinson Charitable Trust funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%6%23%51%90%your share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Marvin S Robinson Charitable Trust?

    Find your warmest path to Marvin S Robinson Charitable Trust through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 20 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph