Skip to content

· Private foundation

Martin Stern Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$65k
Granted FY2025still arriving
18
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$42k
Largest
01What it funds
0191% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Religion$259kEducation$18kInternational$13kHuman Services$7kHealth$5kPhilanthropy$4kArts & Culture$18Other$0
02FY2025 · 18 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k17 grants · $23k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $42k
$500
Median grant
4
States reached
$43k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
AMER FRIENDS OF YESH BNEI RACHEL$42,160
CONG BAIS MOSHE SHMIEL$7,951
Individual grant recipient$4,370
Individual grant recipient$2,700
VARIOUS$1,765
Individual grant recipient$1,440
Individual grant recipient$1,250
OTHONIAN SOCIETY OF USA$500
JERUSALEM CAPITAL DEV FUND$500
Individual grant recipient$500
CHABAD OF LAGUNA$360
VAAD ITZORCHAY REFUAH INC$360
Individual grant recipient$360
YESHIVA OF TORAH VODAATH$250
KAHAL ZICHRON AVROHOM YAAKOV$250
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $2k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%BETH OLOTH: $180 → 14%AMERICAN FRIENDS OF YAD ELIEZER: $500 → 11%AMERICAN FRIENDS OF YAD ELIEZER: $400 → 11%MISASKIM: $460 → 20%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

80%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$280k · 25 repeat orgs$69k to everyone else

25 repeat relationships: 12 still active in FY2025, 13 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

25
50

Total granted

$280k
$67k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+7%
+71%

Still filing today

16%
12%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 97% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $2k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesPhilanthropyEducationReligionHealthInternationalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AF
    AMER FRIENDS OF YESH BNEI RACHEL
    5× · 2021–2025 · $122k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    3× · 2023–2025 · $23k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    5× · 2017–2022 · $21k

Funded once

  • MB
    MASORES BAIS YAAKOV
    one grant, 2024 · $9k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2024 · $6k
  • TA
    TORAH ACADEMY FOR GIRLS
    one grant, 2017 · $6k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Zichron Moshe Elihu Tzedoka Fund
Philanthropy
2
Yeshiva Ohr Yisroel
Philanthropy
3
Yeshiva Beit Rafael

Religious & charitable- to provide funds to enable the study of torah.

Philanthropy
4
Ohr Olam Corp

publish religious books

Religion
5
Zichron Avrohom Yosef
Philanthropy
6
Sherit Isroel
—
7
American Friends of Birchas Mordechai

Raise funds for charitable purposes

Religion
8
Zichroin Rabbeini Meshilem Feiish Ztl Foundation
—
9
University of Judaism Foundation
—
10
American Friends of Ish El Rayahu

To promote, benefit, and support Jewish religious, charitable & educational activities in Israel and the USA.

Religion
11
Ohr Meir Ubracha

The organization provides financial assistance to victims of acts of terrorism in the state of israel.

Philanthropy
12
Friends of Yeshiva Beer Abraham

Furtherance of jewish education

Religion
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Mesorah Heritage Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Hebron Fund Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 82 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
13/13
Grantees still filing
9/13
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

AMER FRIENDS OF YESH BNEI RACHEL: $121,610 · OtherAMER FRIENDS OF YESH BNEI RACHELIndividual grant recipient: $22,650 · OtherIndividual grant recipientIndividual grant recipient: $21,435 · OtherIndividual grant recipientCONG BAIS MOSHE SHMIEL: $20,721 · OtherCONG BAIS MOSHE SHMIELCONG BNEI TORAH: $12,500 · Other+64 more: $113,187 · Other+64 moreYeshiva Tiferes Yisroel: $18,572 · Education+1 more: $500 · EducationCentral Fund of Israel: $12,200 · InternationalAMUDIM COMMUNITY RESOURCES INC: $3,700 · HealthVAAD LTZORCHAY REFUAH: $1,220 · HealthLEV BEREL INC: $1,500 · ReligionAMERICAN FRIENDS OF MOSDOS MONTREAL INC: $500 · ReligionAMERICAN FRIENDS OF YAD ELIEZER: $900 · Human ServicesMISASKIM CORP: $460 · Human ServicesBETH OLOTH: $180 · Human ServicesHEBRON FUND INC: $525 · PhilanthropyTHE FLATBUSH COMMUNITY FUND INC co BERNATH & ROSENBERG PC: $500 · PhilanthropyMESORAH HERITAGE FOUNDATION: $18 · Arts & Culture
Other$312,103Education$19,072International$12,200Health$4,920Religion$2,000Human Services$1,540Philanthropy$1,025Arts & Culture$18

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetYeshiva Tiferes Yisroel: $18,572 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetCentral Fund of Israel: $12,200 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAMUDIM COMMUNITY RESOURCES INC: $3,700 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetLEV BEREL INC: $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetVAAD LTZORCHAY REFUAH: $1,220 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF YAD ELIEZER: $900 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetHEBRON FUND INC: $525 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF MOSDOS MONTREAL INC: $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE FLATBUSH COMMUNITY FUND INC co BERNATH & ROSENBERG PC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMISASKIM CORP: $460 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMESORAH HERITAGE FOUNDATION: $18 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Yeshiva Tiferes Yisroel ↗
  • Who funds Central Fund of Israel ↗
  • Who funds AMUDIM COMMUNITY RESOURCES INC ↗
  • Who funds LEV BEREL INC ↗
  • Who funds VAAD LTZORCHAY REFUAH ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Ojc FundNY28.3× affinity14 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Ojc Fund · Jewish Communal Fund · Allen I Gross Charitable Foundation · Bcg Charitable Foundation · Md Friedman Family Foundation · The Basch Family Foundation · The Wieder Family Foundation Inc · The Reich Family Charitable Trust · Moses and Miriam Vogel Charitable Foundation Tr · Eisenberg Family Foundation Inc · Zichron Chaim Charity Fund · National Society for Hebrew Day Schools

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Martin Stern Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Martin Stern Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 40%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government →median 1%
  • Mesorah Heritage Foundation: 1% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
4get no government money at all
1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Martin Stern Family Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Martin Stern Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 82 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Martin Stern Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph