Skip to content

· Public charity

Martin Pitt Partnership for Children Inc

To make meaningful and measurable investments in the quality of life for young children and families in education, health, and support services.

$402k
Granted FY2025still arriving
6
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$174k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Human Services$3.1MHealth$243kPhilanthropy$27kPublic Safety & Disaster$11kEducation$5k
02FY2025 · 6 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 6 grants below total $376,797, the rows itemized in this filing. The $402,434 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $25,637 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k4 grants · $128k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $249k
$46,602
Median grant
1
States reached
$41k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Pitt County Health Department$173,500
Martin Tyrrell Washington District Health Department$75,200
Carteret County Partnership for Children$46,602
Lenior Greene Partnership for Children$34,127
Onslow County Partnership For Children$33,331
Jones County Partnership for Children$14,037
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 14%. 61% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 14%Carteret County Partnership for Children: $47k → 12%Onslow County Partnership for Children Inc: $36k → 12%Jones County Partnership for Children: $31k → 17%United Way of Pitt County: $17k → 20%MARTIN TYRRELL WASHINGTON DISTRICT HEALTH DEPT: $87k → 21%Lenoir Greene Partnership for Children: $34k → 21%Carteret County Partnership for Children: $47k → 12%Onslow County Partnership for Children Inc: $33k → 12%Jones County Partnership for Children: $14k → 17%United Way of Pitt County: $10k → 20%Martin Tyrrell Washington District Health Department: $75k → 21%Lenoir Greene Partnership for Children: $34k → 21%Carteret County Partnership for Children: $47k → 12%ONSLOW COUNTY PARTNERSHIP FOR CHILDREN INC: $32k → 12%Jones County Partnership for Children: $14k → 17%Martin Tyrrell Washington District Health Department: $75k → 21%Lenoir Greene Partnership for Children: $34k → 21%Carteret County Partnership for Children: $47k → 12%Onslow County Partnership for Children Inc: $32k → 12%Jones County Partnership for Children: $14k → 17%Martin Tyrrell Washington District Health Department: $75k → 21%Lenoir Greene Partnership for Children: $34k → 21%Carteret County Partnership for Children: $47k → 12%Onslow County Partnership for Children Inc: $33k → 12%Jones County Partnership for Children: $14k → 17%Martin Tyrrell Washington District Health Department: $75k → 21%Lenoir Greene Partnership for Children: $34k → 21%Carteret County Partnership for Children: $47k → 12%Onslow County Partnership for Children Inc: $33k → 12%Jones County Partnership for Children: $14k → 17%Martin Tyrrell Washington District Health Department: $75k → 21%Lenoir Greene Partnership for Children: $34k → 21%Carteret County Partnership for Children: $47k → 12%Onslow County Partnership For Children: $33k → 12%Jones County Partnership for Children: $14k → 17%Martin Tyrrell Washington District Health Department: $75k → 21%Lenior Greene Partnership for Children: $34k → 21%CARTERET COUNTY PARTNERSHIP FOR CHILDREN: $46k → 12%Onslow County Partnership for Children: $33k → 12%Jones County Partnership for Children: $14k → 17%Martin Tyrrell Washington District Health Department: $75k → 21%Lenoir Greene Partnership for Children: $33k → 21%Carteret County Partnership for Children: $45k → 12%Onslow County Partnership For Children: $33k → 12%JONES COUNTY PARTNERSHIP FOR CHILDREN: $14k → 17%Martin Tyrrell Washington District Health Dept: $45k → 21%LENOIR-GREENE PARTNERSHIP FOR CHILDREN: $33k → 21%Childcare Network 73: $11k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

99%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$3.3M · 8 repeat orgs$44k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +4% since the first grant, against -4% for those funded once.

8 repeat relationships: 6 still active in FY2025, 2 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

8
2

Total granted

$3.3M
$44k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+4%
-4%

Still filing today

50%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationYouth DevelopmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CO
    COUNTY OF PITT
    9× · 2017–2025 · $1.5M
  • MD
    Martin-Tyrrell-Washington Dist Health DEPT
    9× · 2017–2025 · $658k
  • CC
    CARTERET COUNTY PARTNERSHIP FOR CHILDREN
    9× · 2017–2025 · $417k · revenue +4%

Funded once

  • LC
    LENOIR-GREENE COUNTY PARTNERSHIP FOR CHILDREN
    one grant, 2017 · $33k · revenue -4%
  • CN
    CHILDCARE NETWORK INC
    one grant, 2019 · $11k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field
04the grantee network

5 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 5 of the 10 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
5/5
Grantees still filing
2/5
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

COUNTY OF PITT: $1,522,765 · OtherCOUNTY OF PITTMartin-Tyrrell-Washington Dist Health DEPT: $658,374 · OtherMartin-Tyrrell-Washington Dist Health DEPTLenoir Greene Partnership for Children: $170,891 · OtherLenoir Greene Partnership for ChildrenLenoir Greene Partnership for Children: $101,591 · Other+2 more: $43,045 · OtherONSLOW COUNTY PARTNERSHIP FOR CHILDREN: $300,844 · EducationONSLOW COUNTY P…JONES COUNTY PARTNERSHIP FOR CHILDREN: $143,527 · EducationJONES COUNTY PA…LENOIR-GREENE COUNTY PARTNERSHIP FOR CHILDREN: $33,209 · EducationLENOIR-GREENE C…CARTERET COUNTY PARTNERSHIP FOR CHILDREN: $417,231 · Youth DevelopmentCARTERET COUN…
Other$2,496,666Education$477,580Youth Development$417,231

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCARTERET COUNTY PARTNERSHIP FOR CHILDREN: $417,231 over 9y, 6.3% of budgetONSLOW COUNTY PARTNERSHIP FOR CHILDREN: $300,844 over 9y, 0.3% of budgetJONES COUNTY PARTNERSHIP FOR CHILDREN: $143,527 over 9y, 4.6% of budgetUNITED WAY OF PITT COUNTY INC: $32,400 over 3y, 1.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds CARTERET COUNTY PARTNERSHIP FOR CHILDREN ↗
  • Who funds ONSLOW COUNTY PARTNERSHIP FOR CHILDREN ↗
  • Who funds JONES COUNTY PARTNERSHIP FOR CHILDREN ↗
  • Who funds LENOIR-GREENE COUNTY PARTNERSHIP FOR CHILDREN ↗
  • Who funds UNITED WAY OF PITT COUNTY INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a set of overlaps that mostly run through this funder rather than between each other.

North Carolina Partnership for Children IncNC13.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: North Carolina Partnership for Children Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Martin Pitt Partnership for Children Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Martin Pitt Partnership for Children Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2025
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 10 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Martin Pitt Partnership for Children’s filings →

    More from the funding graph