· Public charity
Marsy's Law for All Foundation
The organization seeks to pass the victims' bill of rights across the united states.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2018–2021.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| FACES OF HOPE FOUNDATION | $5,000 |
| TESTIMONIES OF HOPE INC ARGOW'S HOUSE | $1,000 |
| FAMILY & CHILDREN'S COUNCIL OF BLACK HAWK COUNTY | $750 |
| EXPOSE THE PODCAST FOUNDATION GOLDEN HOUSE | $500 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY18–21, $15k) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 7% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +132% since the first grant, against 0% for the ones you funded once.
3 repeat relationships — 2 still active in FY2021, 1 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2021 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2021, 79% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $2k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- NONATIONAL ORGANIZATION FOR VICTIM ADVOCACY INC3× · 2018–2020 · $19k · revenue +132%
- FAFAMILY ADVOCACY CENTER & EDUCATION SERVI DBA FACES OF HOPE3× · 2018–2021 · $14k · revenue +184%
- FCFAMILY & CHILDREN'S COUNCIL OF BLACK HAWK COUNTY2× · 2019–2021 · $2k · revenue -29%
Funded once
- MLMARSY'S LAW FOR FLORIDAone grant, 2018 · $37M · 99% of their budget
- MLMARSY'S LAW FOR OKLAHOMA SQ 794one grant, 2018 · $3.3M · 85% of their budget
- UOUNIVERSITY OF UTAHone grant, 2019 · $8k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
We provide support to survivors of sexual assault, domestic violence, child sexual abuse, and incest.
Help and heal the heartacheand pain of the abused.
Our mission is to provide compassionate support, resources, and advocacy for victims of violent crime. we are dedicated to empowering children, teens and adults in their journey to healing by offering a safe place, emotional care, and the…
To end domestic violence in the capital area through serving victims of domestic violence, educating the public about domestic violence, and working to eliminate economic, social and cultural conditions and attitudes that contribute to…
Special team on the prevention of domestic violence
Provide counseling, crisis intervention, 24 hour crisis hotline, advocacy, safe housing and supportive services to victims of sexual assault and domestic violence.
Crime victim advocacy center's mission is to pursue a definition of justice which includes the victim. the center serves victims of all types of crime by providing a wide range of services such as counseling, advocacy, and offering…
Violence against women
Aid victims of domestic violence/assualt
This center brings victims of domestic violence and sexual assault together to provide a safe and nurturing place to learn and grow through crisis and case management, court advocacy, support groups and 24 hour crisis hotline.
The family crisis center provides intervention and advocacy for victims of sexual assault and domestic violence. this is done with counselors, court advocates and 24 hour shelter for victims and their children.
Domestic violence abuse counseling
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Family Advocacy Center & Education Servi Dba Faces of Hope and the most unlike its peers is Foundation for Education & Economic Development Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 14 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds MARSY'S LAW FOR FLORIDA ↗
- Who funds MARSY'S LAW FOR OKLAHOMA SQ 794 ↗
- Who funds NATIONAL ORGANIZATION FOR VICTIM ADVOCACY INC ↗
- Who funds FAMILY ADVOCACY CENTER & EDUCATION SERVI DBA FACES OF HOPE ↗
- Who funds FOUNDATION FOR EDUCATION & ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT INC ↗
- Who funds FAMILY & CHILDREN'S COUNCIL OF BLACK HAWK COUNTY ↗
- Who funds TESTIMONIES OF HOPE INC ↗
- Who funds Exposed the Podcast Foundation Corporation ExPOSED Inc ↗
- Who funds SLEEP IN HEAVENLY PEACE INC ↗
- Who funds CRIME VICTIMS' CENTER OF CHESTER COUNTY ↗
- Who funds VICTIMS RESOURCE CENTER ↗
- Who funds BLOOM FOR WOMEN INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Marsy's Law for All Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Marsy's Law for All Foundation?
Find your warmest path to Marsy's Law for All Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.