Skip to content
Marshfield Clinic Inc at a glanceMostly funded, not a grantmaker: see who funds it →

· Public charity

Marshfield Clinic Inc

We enrich lives to create healthy communities through accessible, affordable, compassionate health care.

$603k
Granted FY2024still arriving
1
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$603k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Health$18MPhilanthropy$135kPublic Safety & Disaster$91kHuman Services$51kEducation$36kPublic Benefit$10k
02FY2024 · 1 grant

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$603,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$663M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
FAMILY HEALTH CENTER OF MARSHFIELD INC$603,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%United Way of Portage County: $10k → 10%City of Colby: $10k → 11%FAMILY HEALTH CENTER OF MARSHFIELD INC: $12.5M → 11%Lakeland Union High School: $8k → 12%North Central Health Foundation: $50k → 11%FAMILY HEALTH CENTER OF MARSHFIELD INC: $2.0M → 11%Lakeland Area Scholarship Fund: $8k → 12%United Way of Marathon: $25k → 11%FAMILY HEALTH CENTER OF MARSHFIELD INC: $692k → 11%FAMILY HEALTH CENTER OF MARSHFIELD INC: $603k → 11%Family Health Center of Marshfield Inc: $569k → 11%Family Health Center of Marshfield Inc: $560k → 11%Family Health Center of Marshfield Inc: $544k → 11%Family Health Center of Marshfield Inc: $535k → 11%Marshfield Area United Way: $100k → 11%St Vincent De Paul Outreach: $38k → 11%Marshfield Area YMCA: $14k → 11%School District of Marshfield: $11k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
United Way of Marshall County - Alabama Inc

Our mission is to improve lives by mobilizing people to care for one another in a voluntary, community-wide effort. this shall be done through expanding volunteerism, fundraising programs, as well as planning, supporting, providing, and…

Philanthropy
2
United Way of Dane County Foundation Inc

The United Way of Dane County Foundation, Inc. exists to support the United Way of Dane County mission: to unite the community to achieve measurable results that change lives. By providing a base of support, the Foundation helps United Way…

—
3
Marshalltown Area United Way

To provide a mechanism to encourage charitable giving, to facilitate the distribution of gifts to member agencies that will enhance the quality of life for all marshall county residents.

Philanthropy
4
United Way of Wayne County Inc

United way of wayne county is a community based organization, working in partnership with local non-profit organizations to strategically address many of our community's social issues. united way of wayne county invested in a number of…

Philanthropy
5
United Health Foundation
Philanthropy
6
United Way of Langlade County Inc

United Way uses its global reach and local presence to build stronger, more resilient communities where everyone can thrive. We work to improve the health, education, and economic mobility of every person in every community we serve.

Philanthropy
7
United Way of Illinois

Strengthen United Way movement in Illinois

Philanthropy
8
United Way of Greater Lafayette

Mission - mobilizing our community to action so all can thrive vision - for over 100 years, we have partnered with local nonprofits, businesses, community leaders, donors and volunteers to create solutions that address the most complex…

Philanthropy
9
United Way of Lancaster County Inc

To positively impact lives by mobilizing people and resources in lancaster county with an emphasis on healthy communities, youth opportunities, financial security and community resiliency by partnering with organizations and community…

Philanthropy
10
United Way of Lake County Inc

United way of lake county, along with its mission to "measurably improve the quality of people's lives in lake county", provides the most effective channel through which the community may participate in a voluntary, cooperative effort to…

Philanthropy
11
United Way of South Wood & Adams Counties Inc

The mission of the united way of south wood & adams counties, inc. is: united we change and strenghten lives by investing in our community.

Philanthropy
12
United Way of Greater Milwaukee & Waukesha County Inc

We unite people to create positive lasting change in our community.

Philanthropy
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Marshfield Area United Way; the most unlike its peers is Kohler Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 13 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/10
Grantees still filing
7/10
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

FAMILY HEALTH CENTER OF MARSHFIELD INC: $18,011,759 · HealthFAMILY HEALTH CENTER OF MARSHFIELD INC+1 more: $50,000 · HealthEAU CLAIRE CITY-COUNTY HEALTH DEPARTMENT: $91,214 · OtherST VINCENT DE PAUL THRIFT STORE INC: $37,650 · OtherMARSHFIELD AREA YMCA INC: $13,750 · OtherSCHOOL DISTRICT OF MARSHFIELD: $11,400 · OtherUNITED WAY OF PORTAGE COUNTY INC: $10,000 · OtherCity of Cedarburg: $10,000 · OtherLAKELAND UNION HIGH SCHOOL LAKELAND STAR: $8,000 · OtherMARSHFIELD AREA UNITED WAY: $100,350 · PhilanthropyUNITED WAY OF MARATHON COUNTY INC: $25,000 · PhilanthropyUNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN - EAU CLAIRE FOUNDATION INC: $8,927 · EducationLAKELAND AREA SCHOLARSHIP FUND INC: $8,000 · Education
Health$18,061,759Other$182,014Philanthropy$125,350Education$16,927

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetFAMILY HEALTH CENTER OF MARSHFIELD INC: $18,011,759 over 8y, 16% of budgetMARSHFIELD AREA UNITED WAY: $100,350 over 1y, 12% of budgetST VINCENT DE PAUL THRIFT STORE INC: $37,650 over 1y, 4.9% of budgetUNITED WAY OF MARATHON COUNTY INC: $25,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetMARSHFIELD AREA YMCA INC: $13,750 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetUNITED WAY OF PORTAGE COUNTY INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN - EAU CLAIRE FOUNDATION INC: $8,927 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLAKELAND AREA SCHOLARSHIP FUND INC: $8,000 over 1y, 4.3% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Marshfield Clinic Hea…Green Bay Packers Fou…Greater Green Bay Com…Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
Marshfield Clinic Health System IncWI22.1× affinity8 shared granteesties to 4 of 4Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Marshfield Clinic Health System Inc · Green Bay Packers Foundation · Greater Green Bay Community Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Marshfield Clinic Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Marshfield Clinic Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%5%11%20%funder's share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 13 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Marshfield Clinic’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home