Skip to content
Marshfield Clinic Health System Foundation Inc at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

Marshfield Clinic Health System Foundation Inc

We enrich lives to create healthy communities through accessible, affordable, compassionate health care.

$7.2M
Granted FY2024still arriving
5
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$4.3M
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Health$36MEmployment$1.7MYouth Development$7k
02FY2024 · 5 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k1 grant · $8k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $81k
  • $250k+3 grants · $7.1M
$1,046,201
Median grant
1
States reached
$161M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MARSHFIELD CLINIC INC$4,267,831
MCHS HOSPITALS INC$1,744,594
UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-STEVENS POINT FOUNDATION$1,046,201
MARSHFIELD CLINIC HEALTH SYSTEM INC$80,629
LAKEVIEW MEDICAL CENTER INC OF RICE LAKE$8,350
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-STEVENS POINT FOUNDATION: $1.0M → 10%Marshfield Clinic Inc: $5.0M → 11%FLAMBEAU HOSPITAL INC: $10k → 12%LAKEVIEW MEDICAL CENTER INC OF RICE LAKE: $129k → 13%MEMORIAL HOSPITAL INC: $65k → 13%UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-STEVENS POINT FOUNDATION: $242k → 10%MARSHFIELD CLINIC INC: $4.3M → 11%Lakeview Medical Center Inc of Rice Lake: $14k → 13%UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-STEVENS POINT FOUNDATION: $237k → 10%MARSHFIELD CLINIC INC: $4.1M → 11%LAKEVIEW MEDICAL CENTER INC OF RICE LAKE: $13k → 13%UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-STEVENS POINT FOUNDATION: $201k → 10%MARSHFIELD CLINIC INC: $3.8M → 11%LAKEVIEW MEDICAL CENTER INC OF RICE LAKE: $12k → 13%Marshfield Clinic Inc: $3.4M → 11%LAKEVIEW MEDICAL CENTER INC OF RICE LAKE: $8k → 13%MARSHFIELD CLINIC INC: $3.3M → 11%MCHS HOSPITALS INC: $1.7M → 11%MCHS HOSPITALS INC: $1.7M → 11%MCHS HOSPITALS INC: $1.4M → 11%MCHS Hospitals Inc: $1.4M → 11%MCHS HOSPITALS INC: $1.3M → 11%MARSHFIELD CLINIC INC: $1.0M → 11%Marshfield Clinic Inc: $813k → 11%MCHS Hospitals Inc: $722k → 11%MARSHFIELD CLINIC HEALTH SYSTEM INC: $373k → 11%MCHS HOSPITALS INC: $342k → 11%MARSHFIELD CLINIC HEALTH SYSTEM INC: $290k → 11%Marshfield Clinic Health System Inc: $182k → 11%Marshfield Clinic Health System Inc: $165k → 11%MARSHFIELD CLINIC HEALTH SYSTEM INC: $81k → 11%MARSHFIELD CLINIC HEALTH SYSTEM INC: $74k → 11%MARSHFIELD CLINIC HEALTH SYSTEM INC: $57k → 11%Marshfield Clinic Health System Inc: $32k → 11%Family Health Center of Marshfield Inc: $15k → 11%Family Health Center of Marshfield Inc: $13k → 11%MARSHFIELD AREA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC: $7k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

100%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$38M · 6 repeat orgs$75k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +45% since the first grant, against -3% for those funded once.

6 repeat relationships: 5 still active in FY2024, 1 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

6
2

Total granted

$38M
$75k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+45%
-3%

Still filing today

100%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
HealthEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MH
    MCHS HOSPITALS INC
    7× · 2018–2024 · $8.6M · revenue +131%
  • UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-STEVENS POINT FOUNDATION INC
    4× · 2020–2024 · $1.7M · revenue +45%
  • MC
    MARSHFIELD CLINIC HEALTH SYSTEM INC
    8× · 2017–2024 · $1.3M · revenue +219%

Funded once

  • MH
    MEMORIAL HOSPITAL INC
    one grant, 2021 · $65k · revenue -3%
  • FH
    FLAMBEAU HOSPITAL INC
    one grant, 2023 · $10k · revenue -15%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Marshfield Clinic Health System Foundation Inc

We enrich lives to create healthy communities through accessible, affordable, compassionate health care.

Health
2
Dickinson County Healthcare System

We enrich lives to create healthy communities through accessible, affordable, compassionate health care.

Health
3
Beaver Dam Community Hospitals Inc

We enrich lives to create healthy communities through accessible, affordable, compassionate health care.

Health
4
Mclaren Northern Michigan

Mclaren health care, through its subsidiaries, will be the best value in health care as defined by quality outcomes and cost.

Health
5
Northern Michigan Hematology and Oncology

Provide professional services for the diagnosis and treatment of cancer and infectious disease and related conditions.

Health
6
Mclaren Macomb

Mclaren health care corporation, along with its subsidiaries, will be michigan's best value in healthcare as defined by quality outcomes and cost.

Health
7
Mercy Harvard Hospital Inc

The mission of mercy harvard hospital, inc. (mhh) is "exceptional health care services with a passion for making lives better." the foundation of this mission is based on a vision of quality: excellence in patient care; service:…

Health
8
Memorial Hermann Medical Group

Memorial hermann health system is a nonprofit, values-driven, community-owned health system dedicated to improving health. our vision is to create healthier communities, now and for generations to come. our values are community,…

Health
9
Nebraska Methodist Hospital

Nebraska methodist hospital (commonly know as "methodist hospital") is an acute care facility dedicated to bringing high quality care for the mind, body and spirit of every person. we provide community-based health care, health education…

Health
10
Marshall Health Services Inc

Marshall health services inc (mhs) is organized and operated to provide an integrated health care delivery system that provides quality health care to marshall, tx and the surrounding communities. it provides health care to the public…

—
11
The Cardiac Institute

Our mission is to help people to live longer, healthier lives with dignity, and to use all of our resources to give them everything they expect and deserve in comprehensive cardiovascular care for their families and themselves.

Health
12
Physicians Clinic Inc

Methodist physicians clinic provides accessible, quality medical care through its integrated team of health professionals, including specialists in family medicine, internal medicine, pediatrics, obstetrics and gynecology, surgery,…

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Memorial Hospital Inc; the most unlike its peers is University of Wisconsin-Stevens Point Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2024, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
5/9
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

MARSHFIELD CLINIC INC: $25,760,612 · HealthMARSHFIELD CLINIC INCMCHS HOSPITALS INC: $8,582,922 · HealthMCHS HOSPITALS INCMARSHFIELD CLINIC HEALTH SYSTEM INC: $1,253,802 · Health+4 more: $279,825 · HealthUNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-STEVENS POINT FOUNDATION INC: $1,726,825 · EducationMARSHFIELD AREA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC: $7,456 · Philanthropy
Health$35,877,161Education$1,726,825Philanthropy$7,456

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetMARSHFIELD CLINIC INC: $25,760,612 over 8y, 0.7% of budgetMCHS HOSPITALS INC: $8,582,922 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-STEVENS POINT FOUNDATION INC: $1,726,825 over 4y, 13% of budgetMARSHFIELD CLINIC HEALTH SYSTEM INC: $1,253,802 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetLAKEVIEW MEDICAL CENTER INC OF RICE LAKE: $176,460 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetMEMORIAL HOSPITAL INC: $65,100 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetFAMILY HEALTH CENTER OF MARSHFIELD INC: $27,972 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFLAMBEAU HOSPITAL INC: $10,293 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMARSHFIELD AREA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC: $7,456 over 1y, 0.3% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Marshfield Clinic Health System Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Marshfield Clinic Health System Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24
no gov · 00%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
    typical government reliance, FY20–24
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 9 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Marshfield Clinic Health System’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home