Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

Marshfield Clinic Health System Foundation Inc

We enrich lives to create healthy communities through accessible, affordable, compassionate health care.

$7.2M
Granted FY2024still arriving
5
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$4.3M
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172024.

Health$36MEmployment$1.7MYouth Development$7k
02FY2024 · 5 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k1 grant · $8k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $81k
  • $250k+3 grants · $7.1M
$1,046,201
Median grant
1
States reached
$161M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MARSHFIELD CLINIC INC$4,267,831
MCHS HOSPITALS INC$1,744,594
UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-STEVENS POINT FOUNDATION$1,046,201
MARSHFIELD CLINIC HEALTH SYSTEM INC$80,629
LAKEVIEW MEDICAL CENTER INC OF RICE LAKE$8,350
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY17–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-STEVENS POINT FOUNDATION: $1.0M → 10%Marshfield Clinic Inc: $5.0M → 11%FLAMBEAU HOSPITAL INC: $10k → 12%LAKEVIEW MEDICAL CENTER INC OF RICE LAKE: $129k → 13%MEMORIAL HOSPITAL INC: $65k → 13%UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-STEVENS POINT FOUNDATION: $242k → 10%MARSHFIELD CLINIC INC: $4.3M → 11%Lakeview Medical Center Inc of Rice Lake: $14k → 13%UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-STEVENS POINT FOUNDATION: $237k → 10%MARSHFIELD CLINIC INC: $4.1M → 11%LAKEVIEW MEDICAL CENTER INC OF RICE LAKE: $13k → 13%UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-STEVENS POINT FOUNDATION: $201k → 10%MARSHFIELD CLINIC INC: $3.8M → 11%LAKEVIEW MEDICAL CENTER INC OF RICE LAKE: $12k → 13%Marshfield Clinic Inc: $3.4M → 11%LAKEVIEW MEDICAL CENTER INC OF RICE LAKE: $8k → 13%MARSHFIELD CLINIC INC: $3.3M → 11%MCHS HOSPITALS INC: $1.7M → 11%MCHS HOSPITALS INC: $1.7M → 11%MCHS HOSPITALS INC: $1.4M → 11%MCHS Hospitals Inc: $1.4M → 11%MCHS HOSPITALS INC: $1.3M → 11%MARSHFIELD CLINIC INC: $1.0M → 11%Marshfield Clinic Inc: $813k → 11%MCHS Hospitals Inc: $722k → 11%MARSHFIELD CLINIC HEALTH SYSTEM INC: $373k → 11%MCHS HOSPITALS INC: $342k → 11%MARSHFIELD CLINIC HEALTH SYSTEM INC: $290k → 11%Marshfield Clinic Health System Inc: $182k → 11%Marshfield Clinic Health System Inc: $165k → 11%MARSHFIELD CLINIC HEALTH SYSTEM INC: $81k → 11%MARSHFIELD CLINIC HEALTH SYSTEM INC: $74k → 11%MARSHFIELD CLINIC HEALTH SYSTEM INC: $57k → 11%Marshfield Clinic Health System Inc: $32k → 11%Family Health Center of Marshfield Inc: $15k → 11%Family Health Center of Marshfield Inc: $13k → 11%MARSHFIELD AREA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC: $7k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

100%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$38M · 6 repeat orgs$75k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +45% since the first grant, against -3% for the ones you funded once.

6 repeat relationships — 5 still active in FY2024, 1 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

6
2

Total granted

$38M
$75k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+45%
-3%

Still filing today

100%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
HealthEducationOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MH
    MCHS HOSPITALS INC
    7× · 2018–2024 · $8.6M · revenue +131%
  • UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-STEVENS POINT FOUNDATION INC
    4× · 2020–2024 · $1.7M · revenue +45%
  • MC
    MARSHFIELD CLINIC HEALTH SYSTEM INC
    8× · 2017–2024 · $1.3M · revenue +219%

Funded once

  • MH
    MEMORIAL HOSPITAL INC
    one grant, 2021 · $65k · revenue -3%
  • FH
    FLAMBEAU HOSPITAL INC
    one grant, 2023 · $10k · revenue -15%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Marshfield Clinic Health System Foundation Inc

We enrich lives to create healthy communities through accessible, affordable, compassionate health care.

Health
2
Dickinson County Healthcare System

We enrich lives to create healthy communities through accessible, affordable, compassionate health care.

Health
3
Beaver Dam Community Hospitals Inc

We enrich lives to create healthy communities through accessible, affordable, compassionate health care.

Health
4
Mclaren Northern Michigan

Mclaren health care, through its subsidiaries, will be the best value in health care as defined by quality outcomes and cost.

Health
5
Mclaren Port Huron

Mclaren healthcare, through its subsidiaries, will be the best value in healthcare as defined by quality outcomes and cost.

Health
6
Northern Michigan Hematology and Oncology

Provide professional services for the diagnosis and treatment of cancer and infectious disease and related conditions.

Health
7
Mclaren Macomb

Mclaren health care corporation, along with its subsidiaries, will be michigan's best value in healthcare as defined by quality outcomes and cost.

Health
8
Mercy Harvard Hospital Inc

The mission of mercy harvard hospital, inc. (mhh) is "exceptional health care services with a passion for making lives better." the foundation of this mission is based on a vision of quality: excellence in patient care; service:…

Health
9
Memorial Hermann Medical Group

Memorial hermann health system is a nonprofit, values-driven, community-owned health system dedicated to improving health. our vision is to create healthier communities, now and for generations to come. our values are community,…

Health
10
Nebraska Methodist Hospital

Nebraska methodist hospital (commonly know as "methodist hospital") is an acute care facility dedicated to bringing high quality care for the mind, body and spirit of every person. we provide community-based health care, health education…

Health
11
Marshall Health Services Inc

Marshall health services inc (mhs) is organized and operated to provide an integrated health care delivery system that provides quality health care to marshall, tx and the surrounding communities. it provides health care to the public…

12
Mclaren Northern Michigan Foundation

To receive and administer funds to support the mission of mclaren northern michigan and support programs that enhance the well-being of the community.

Health

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Memorial Hospital Inc and the most unlike its peers is University of Wisconsin-Stevens Point Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
5/9
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

MARSHFIELD CLINIC INC — $25,760,612 · HealthMARSHFIELD CLINIC INCMCHS HOSPITALS INC — $8,582,922 · HealthMCHS HOSPITALS INCMARSHFIELD CLINIC HEALTH SYSTEM INC — $1,253,802 · Health+4 more — $279,825 · HealthUNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-STEVENS POINT FOUNDATION INC — $1,726,825 · EducationMARSHFIELD AREA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC — $7,456 · Philanthropy
Health$35,877,161Education$1,726,825Philanthropy$7,456

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetMARSHFIELD CLINIC INC — $25,760,612 over 8y, 0.7% of budgetMCHS HOSPITALS INC — $8,582,922 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-STEVENS POINT FOUNDATION INC — $1,726,825 over 4y, 13% of budgetMARSHFIELD CLINIC HEALTH SYSTEM INC — $1,253,802 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetLAKEVIEW MEDICAL CENTER INC OF RICE LAKE — $176,460 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetMEMORIAL HOSPITAL INC — $65,100 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetFAMILY HEALTH CENTER OF MARSHFIELD INC — $27,972 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFLAMBEAU HOSPITAL INC — $10,293 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMARSHFIELD AREA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC — $7,456 over 1y, 0.3% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Marshfield Clinic Health System Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
2021222324
no gov · 00%1%4%8%15%your share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
    typical government reliance, FY2024

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 9 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph