Skip to content

· Private foundation

Marshall Family Foundation Inc

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$7k
Granted FY2024still arriving
26
Grants FY2024still arriving
8
States reached
$2k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2024.

Religion$11kEducation$11kCommunity Improvement$3kEmployment$2kHuman Services$2kInternational$1kAnimals$1kHousing & Shelter$900Other$0
02FY2024 · 26 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$100
Median grant
8
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ALL SAINTS EPISCOPAL CHURCH OF WP$1,595
FIRST UNITED METHODIST CHURCH WP$1,095
LAKE TOXAWAY FIRST METHODIST CHURCH$1,095
LAKE HIGHLAND PREPARATORY FUND$1,000
ASHEVILLE ROTARY CLUB$250
SAINT ANDREW BY THE SEA$250
HENDERSONVILLE ROTARY CLUB$250
Individual grant recipient$100
HUMANE SOCIETY OF THE USA$100
UMCOR$100
ORLANDO RESCUE MISSION$100
FLORIDA BAR FOUNDATION$100
EMORY UNIVERSITY$100
ST JUDES CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL$100
SADDLEBACK CHURCH$100
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY22–23, $200) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%WINTER PARK DAY NURSERY: $100 → 13%WINTER PARK DAY NURSERY: $100 → 13%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
NY
CA
VA
MD
AZ
KS
TN
NC
DC
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

65%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$21k · 32 repeat orgs$11k to everyone else

32 repeat relationships: 22 still active in FY2024, 10 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

32
15

Total granted

$21k
$9k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+32%
+54%

Still filing today

28%
27%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 66% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $3k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24
EducationAnimalsHuman ServicesInternationalCrime & LegalPublic Safety & DisasterOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TA
    THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS
    4× · 2021–2024 · $400 · revenue +14%
  • TA
    THE AOPA FOUNDATION INC
    3× · 2022–2024 · $300 · revenue +32%
  • IT
    IN TOUCH MINISTRIES INC
    3× · 2022–2024 · $300 · revenue +40%

Funded once

  • EU
    Emory Universitygraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $7k · revenue +54%
  • YW
    YMCA WESTERN NC HENDERSONVILLE
    one grant, 2021 · $500
  • YW
    YMCA WESTERN NC ASHEVILLE
    one grant, 2021 · $500
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
New York University

Nyu is a private university with approximately 60,000 matriculating students in 20 schools and institutes. nyu's primary missions are education, research and scholarship, and patient care.

Education
2
Aerial Recovery

Aerial recovery's mission is to save lives and stop evil. through the creation and deployment of humanitarian special operators, aerial recovery brings together selected veterans, first responders, and mission-qualified civilians who,…

—
3
The Fund for Peace Inc

Building bridges across diverse sectors, and developing innovative technologies and tools for policy makers. a leader in the conflict assessment and early warning field, the fund for peace focuses on the problems of weak and failing…

International
4
Animal Wellness Action

To prevent cruelty to animals, we promote enacting and enforcing good public policies. enacting good laws depends upon electing good lawmakers, and we remind voters which candidates care about and support animal issues.

Human Services
5
World Wildlife Fund Inc

Wwf's mission is to conserve nature and reduce the most pressing threats to the diversity of life on earth. (continued on schedule o)

Environment
6
Webster University

Founded in 1915, webster is a private non-profit and global university that is committed to delivering high-quality learning experiences that transform students for global citizenship and individual excellence.

Education
7
World Animal Protection

World animal protection is a global organization working to end factory farming and wildlife exploitation. we expose cruel systems, promote animal-friendly alternatives, and influence policy change. for over 75 years, we've been rewriting…

Animals
8
Committee to Protect Journalists Inc

The committee to protect journalists promotes press freedom worldwide and defends the right of journalists to report the news safely and without fear of reprisal. cpj ensures the free flow of news and commentary by taking action wherever…

Civil Rights
9
Furman University

The primary mission of furman as a liberal arts institution is to provide a distinctive education in fine arts, humanities, social sciences, mathematics and the sciences, as well as selected professional disciplines.

Education
10
Stony Brook Urology University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
11
Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University Inc

Embry-riddle is the world leader in aviation and aerospace higher education. its mission is to teach the science, practice and business of aviation and aerospace, preparing students for productive careers and leadership roles in business,…

Education
12
Project Hope - the People-to-People Health Foundation Inc

To conduct and support programs and activities aimed at solving some of the world's greatest public health challenges, with a specific focus on enabling health workers to have the greatest possible impact on the health of the people they…

International
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Wounded Warrior Project Inc; the most unlike its peers is The American Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

15 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 15 of the 52 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
14/15
Grantees still filing
12/15
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

LAKE HIGHLAND PREPARATORY FUND: $3,300 · OtherLAKE HIGHLAND PREPARATORY FUNDALL SAINTS EPISCOPAL CHURCH OF WP: $3,045 · OtherALL SAINTS EPISCOPAL CHURCH OF WPLAKE TOXAWAY UNITED METHODIST CHURC: $2,320 · OtherLAKE TOXAWAY UNITED METHODIST CHURCROTARY CLUB OF ORLLOCAL FOUNDATION: $1,600 · OtherROTARY CLUB OF ORLLOCAL FOUNDATIONHENDERSONVILLE ROTARY CLUB: $1,500 · OtherHENDERSONVILLE ROTARY CLUBASHEVILLE ROTARY CLUB: $1,500 · OtherASHEVILLE ROTARY CLUBLAKE TOXAWAY FIRST METHODIST CHURCH: $1,095 · OtherFIRST UNITED METHODIST CHURCH WP: $1,095 · Other+31 more: $7,510 · Other+31 moreEmory University: $6,500 · EducationEmory UniversitySTETSON UNIVERSITY INC: $300 · EducationSTEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION: $300 · EducationTHE ROTARY FOUNDATION OF ROTARY INTERNATIONAL: $1,000 · InternationalHABITAT FOR HUMANITY INTERNATIONAL INC: $300 · InternationalTHE CARTER CENTER INC: $300 · InternationalTHE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS: $400 · AnimalsPEOPLE FOR THE ETHICAL TREATMENT OF ANIMALS INC: $125 · AnimalsTHE AOPA FOUNDATION INC: $300 · Public Safety & DisasterIN TOUCH MINISTRIES INC: $300 · ReligionTHE FLORIDA BAR FOUNDATION INC: $300 · Crime & LegalWINTER PARK DAY NURSERY INC: $200 · Human ServicesWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC: $100 · Human Services
Other$22,965Education$7,100International$1,600Animals$525Public Safety & Disaster$300Religion$300Crime & Legal$300Human Services$300

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetEmory University: $6,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE ROTARY FOUNDATION OF ROTARY INTERNATIONAL: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS: $400 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetTHE AOPA FOUNDATION INC: $300 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetHENDERSONVILLE RESCUE MISSION: $300 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetSTETSON UNIVERSITY INC: $300 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHABITAT FOR HUMANITY INTERNATIONAL INC: $300 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetSTEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION: $300 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHE FLORIDA BAR FOUNDATION INC: $300 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHE CARTER CENTER INC: $300 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTURNING POINT USA INC: $200 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetWINTER PARK DAY NURSERY INC: $200 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetPEOPLE FOR THE ETHICAL TREATMENT OF ANIMALS INC: $125 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Emory University ↗
  • Who funds THE ROTARY FOUNDATION OF ROTARY INTERNATIONAL ↗
  • Who funds THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS ↗
  • Who funds THE AOPA FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds HENDERSONVILLE RESCUE MISSION ↗
  • Who funds STETSON UNIVERSITY INC ↗
  • Who funds IN TOUCH MINISTRIES INC ↗
  • Who funds HABITAT FOR HUMANITY INTERNATIONAL INC ↗
  • Who funds STEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds THE FLORIDA BAR FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds THE CARTER CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds TURNING POINT USA INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a set of overlaps that mostly run through this funder rather than between each other.

Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift FundMA6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Marshall Family Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Marshall Family Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Stetson University Inc: 0% of income from government
  • Wounded Warrior Project Inc: 0% of income from government
  • The Florida Bar Foundation Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 52 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Marshall Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph