Skip to content

· Private foundation

Marshall County Foundation for Fine Arts Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$59k
Granted FY2025still arriving
18
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$35k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Religion$162kAnimals$90kArts & Culture$34kHuman Services$17kEducation$5kRecreation & Sports$3kHealth$2kCivil Rights$1kOther$0
02FY2025 · 18 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k16 grants · $14k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $45k
$1,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$771k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CHURCH OF THE EPIPHANY$34,950
SECOND CHANCE ANIMAL SHELTER$10,000
WESTSIDE ANIMAL SHELTER$2,000
MARSHALL CO CHRISTMAS COALITION$2,000
GUNTERSVILLE MUSEUM$1,700
CHURCH OF THE EPIPHANY$1,700
THE WHOLE BACKSTAGE$1,140
POWELL COUNTY HUMANE SOCIETY$1,000
ART ON THE LAKE$1,000
Individual grant recipient$950
LIGHTHOUSE THEATER GROUP$500
APPLE FOUNDATION$500
Individual grant recipient$364
CHEROKEE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL$265
GUNTERSVILLE HIGH SCHOOL$230
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $15k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%NARAL PRO-CHOICE AMERICA: $250 → 14%BLESSINGS IN A BACKPACK: $100 → 15%NARAL PRO-CHOICE AMERICA: $100 → 14%MARSHALL CO CHRISTMAS COALITION: $2k → 17%MARSHALL CO CHRISTMAS COALITION: $2k → 17%MARSHALL CO CHRISTMAS COALITION: $2k → 17%MARSHALL CO CHRISTMAS COALITION: $2k → 17%MARSHALL CO CHRISTMAS COALITION: $2k → 17%MARSHALL CO CHRISTMAS COALITION: $2k → 17%MARSHALL CO CHRISTMAS COALITION: $2k → 17%MARSHALL CO CHRISTMAS COALITION: $500 → 17%MARSHALL CO CHRISTMAS COALITION: $300 → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

97%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$307k · 23 repeat orgs$9k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +56% since the first grant, against -5% for those funded once.

23 repeat relationships: 13 still active in FY2025, 10 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

23
22

Total granted

$307k
$8k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+56%
-5%

Still filing today

30%
5%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 97% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $2k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesArts & CultureEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MC
    MARSHALL COUNTY CHRISTMAS COALITION
    9× · 2017–2025 · $14k · revenue +56%
  • TG
    THE GUNTERSVILLE MUSEUM INC
    8× · 2017–2025 · $3k · revenue +64%
  • MV
    MOUNTAIN VALLEY COUNCIL ON THE ARTS MOUNTAIN VALLEY ARTS COUNCIL
    4× · 2017–2021 · $3k · revenue +14%

Funded once

  • HH
    HUNTSVILLE HOSPITAL CANCER CENTER
    one grant, 2021 · $1k
  • MC
    MARSHALL COUNTY ANIMAL ADVOCATES
    one grant, 2021 · $1k
  • GH
    GUNTERSVILLE HIGH SCHOOL BAND
    one grant, 2022 · $850
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Shelby County Historical Society

Preserve the history of shelby county al

—
2
Friends of the Alabama Governors Mansion Inc

To Preserve the Governors Mansion

Arts & Culture
3
Friends of the Gadsden County Public Library Inc
—
4
Gatchell Museum Association
Education
5
Seguin-Guadalupe County Heritage Museum Inc
—
6
Bureau County Historical Society
—
7
Hickman County Historical Society

To Preserve and teach Local Hictory

—
8
Boundary County Historical Society Inc

Museum

Arts & Culture
9
Alabama Veterans Museum & Archives

Education-military history

Arts & Culture
10
Washington County Historical Society

Local museum and historical society

Arts & Culture
11
Sanderson Museum and Village
Arts & Culture
12
Marshall County Historical Society

Preserving the history of Marshall County. Our mission is discovery, preservation, and dissemination of our county history.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Guntersville Museum Inc; the most unlike its peers is Guntersvill Historical Society Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 49 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
6/8
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CHURCH OF THE EPIPHANY: $162,100 · OtherCHURCH OF THE EPIPHANYSECOND CHANCE ANIMAL SHELTER: $71,250 · OtherSECOND CHANCE ANIMAL SHELTERWESTSIDE ANIMAL SHELTER: $16,000 · OtherWESTSIDE ANIMAL SHELTER+40 more: $34,647 · Other+40 moreWHOLE BACKSTAGE INC: $13,038 · Arts & CultureTHE GUNTERSVILLE MUSEUM INC: $2,950 · Arts & CultureMARSHALL COUNTY CHRISTMAS COALITION: $14,300 · Human Services+2 more: $450 · Human ServicesApple Foundation Inc: $1,550 · Education
Other$283,997Arts & Culture$15,988Human Services$14,750Education$1,550

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetMARSHALL COUNTY CHRISTMAS COALITION: $14,300 over 9y, 0.8% of budgetWHOLE BACKSTAGE INC: $13,038 over 9y, 1.4% of budgetTHE GUNTERSVILLE MUSEUM INC: $2,950 over 8y, 3.5% of budgetMOUNTAIN VALLEY COUNCIL ON THE ARTS MOUNTAIN VALLEY ARTS COUNCIL: $2,850 over 4y, 2.3% of budgetApple Foundation Inc: $1,550 over 6y, 0.6% of budgetREPRODUCTIVE FREEDOM FOR ALL: $350 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetGUNTERSVILL HISTORICAL SOCIETY INC: $330 over 4y, 2.2% of budgetBLESSINGS IN A BACKPACK INC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds MARSHALL COUNTY CHRISTMAS COALITION ↗
  • Who funds WHOLE BACKSTAGE INC ↗
  • Who funds THE GUNTERSVILLE MUSEUM INC ↗
  • Who funds MOUNTAIN VALLEY COUNCIL ON THE ARTS MOUNTAIN VALLEY ARTS COUNCIL ↗
  • Who funds Apple Foundation Inc ↗
  • Who funds REPRODUCTIVE FREEDOM FOR ALL ↗
  • Who funds GUNTERSVILL HISTORICAL SOCIETY INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a set of overlaps that mostly run through this funder rather than between each other.

Amazonsmile FoundationWA1.8× affinity4 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Marshall County Foundation for Fine Arts Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Marshall County Foundation for Fine Arts Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Marshall County Foundation for Fine Arts Inc?

    Find your warmest path to Marshall County Foundation for Fine Arts Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 49 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Marshall County Foundation for Fine Arts’ filings →

    More from the funding graph