Skip to content

· Private foundation

Mars Family Foundation Inc

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$289k
Granted FY2024still arriving
23
Grants FY2024still arriving
5
States reached
$75k
Largest
01What it funds
0197% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Education$329kReligion$225kHealth$165kHuman Services$158kArts & Culture$98kPhilanthropy$75kRecreation & Sports$48kYouth Development$36kOther$0
02FY2024 · 23 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k13 grants · $49k
  • $10k–50k8 grants · $106k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $134k
$5,075
Median grant
5
States reached
$2.7M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CHARITYEZ INC$75,000
CHILDRENS HOSPITAL OF WISCONSIN INC$59,260
MILWAUKEE YOUTH THEATER INC$20,000
MAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF WISCONSIN$18,500
Individual grant recipient$15,000
MARCUS CENTER FOR PERFORMING ARTS I$12,500
CORNERSTONE OF GRACE$10,000
KAUAI ANIMAL EDUCATION CENTER$10,000
THE HARRY AND ROSE SAMSON FAMILY JE$10,000
SIEBERT LUTHERAN FOUNDATION INC$10,000
BLOOM360 LEARNING COMMUNITY INC$8,207
WISH FOR OUR HEROES INC$5,075
LIFECAMP USA INC$5,000
OAKDALE PARK CHURCH$5,000
A DOLL LIKE ME INC$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–24, $68k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 11% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%KAUA'I NORTH SHORE FOOD PANTRY: $5k → 9%CORNERSTONE OF GRACE: $25k → 8%CORNERSTONE OF GRACE: $21k → 8%PROFESSIONAL FIRE FIGHTERS OF WISCONSIN CHARITABLE FOUNDATION: $7k → 10%CORNERSTONE OF GRACE: $10k → 8%SERENITY INNS INC: $600 → 17%JOBS WORK MKE: $100 → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WI
MI
IN
OH
VA
TN
HI
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

56%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$673k · 21 repeat orgs$528k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +77% since the first grant, against +39% for those funded once.

21 repeat relationships: 7 still active in FY2024, 14 since wound down; 16 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

21
43

Total granted

$673k
$307k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+77%
+39%

Still filing today

48%
23%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 24% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $221k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesEducationHealthYouth DevelopmentPublic BenefitPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • OC
    OZAUKEE CHRISTIAN SCHOOL INC
    4× · 2020–2023 · $91k · revenue +80%
  • CO
    Cornerstone of Grace
    3× · 2021–2024 · $55k · revenue +165%
  • TP
    THE PRAIRIE SCHOOL INC
    3× · 2017–2023 · $27k · revenue +60%

Funded once

  • MO
    MOUNT OLIVE LUTHERAN SCHOOL
    one grant, 2023 · $35k
  • HA
    HEAT ATHLETICS INC
    one grant, 2018 · $25k · revenue -86%
  • CH
    CHILDRENS HOSPITAL
    one grant, 2023 · $25k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Hope Homes International Inc

Provides children in kenya that have been literally thrown away by their parents a new loving home-(not orphanage or boarding house) with a mother, father and siblings. they are also put into the top school in the city and given a first…

Recreation & Sports
2
Christian Helplines Inc

Providing Kenya's orphaned and vulnerable children with nutrition, education, and support. Kenya's Kidz is a proud supporter of Namayiana Children's Home, a children's home located in Olosho-Oibor, Kenya.

—
3
Thrive Kenya

Thrive Kenya supports over 400 orphaned, abandoned, abused, neglected, and vulnerable impoverished children living in the rural area of Homa Bay County, Kenya and in the slums of Nairobi, Kenya. Our vision for every child is that they grow…

International
4
Kenyas Kids in Need Inc

Providing schooling and basic needs to kids in Kenya.

International
5
Love Without Borders Inc

Our sole purpose is to mobilize others to join us as we look after widows and orphans in their distress, as mandated in james 1:27. all of our projects are focused on providing life-giving hope and sustainable solutions to impoverished…

International
6
Hope Matters International

Hope Matters International supports a 24-bed hospital in a rural area of Kenya that is underserved by medical services. It has seen as many as 100 patients per day and has full medical and administrative staff, including emergency services.

International
7
Living Hope Ministries Int'l Inc

To support an orphanage in kenya.

Human Services
8
Heartcry Ministries

Prison ministry

Crime & Legal
9
Hope for Kids Childcare Center

To provide an exceptional, safe, caring enironment that creates an enthusiasm in children for lifelong learning.

Human Services
10
CHARIOTS4HOPE-Wisconsin Corporation

A religious organization that shares the gift of transportation through vehicle maintenance, repair and donations.

Human Services
11
Love One Another Project

To share the gospel and be the hands and feet of jesus christ by loving, encouraging and providing resources in kenya and uganda, east africa. we provide funds for food, education, transportation, medical care, job skills training, clean…

International
12
Faith Partners Inc

Christian missionary work in western Kenya

Religion
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Make-a-Wish Foundation of Wisconsin Inc; the most unlike its peers is Siebert Lutheran Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

27 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 27 of the 80 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
11
Early backer (in before they grew)
26/27
Grantees still filing
19/27
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

SHALOM MINISTRIES: $110,000 · OtherSHALOM MINISTRIESSAINT PAUL'S LUTHERAN SCHOOL: $62,500 · OtherSAINT PAUL'S LUTHERAN SCHOOLJOURNEYS LUTHERAN SCHOOL INC: $61,000 · OtherJOURNEYS LUTHERAN SCHOOL INCWISCONSIN LUTHERAN HIGH SCHOOL: $58,368 · OtherWISCONSIN LUTHERAN HIGH SCHOOLMILWAUKEE YOUTH THEATRE INC: $40,000 · OtherMOUNT OLIVE LUTHERAN SCHOOL: $35,000 · OtherST PAUL LUTHERAN CHURCH: $29,399 · Other+54 more: $401,255 · Other+54 moreOZAUKEE CHRISTIAN SCHOOL INC: $91,000 · EducationOZAUKEE CHRI…THE PRAIRIE SCHOOL INC: $27,000 · EducationTHE PRAIRIE …BLOOM360 LEARNING COMMUNITY INC: $9,207 · EducationBLOOM360 LEA…+1 more: $250 · EducationCHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF WISCONSIN INC: $59,260 · HealthMAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF WISCONSIN INC: $18,500 · HealthA Doll Like Me INC: $5,000 · Health+1 more: $700 · HealthCHARITYEZ INC: $75,000 · PhilanthropyCornerstone of Grace: $55,360 · Human ServicesPROFESSIONAL FIRE FIGHTERS OF WISCONSIN CHARITABLE FOUNDATION INC: $7,000 · Human ServicesKAUAI NORTH SHORE FOOD PANTRY: $5,000 · Human Services+2 more: $700 · Human ServicesHOPE THROUGH RESTORATION INC: $19,000 · Youth DevelopmentLIFECAMP USA INC: $5,000 · Youth DevelopmentJACARRIE KICKS FOR KIDS INC: $2,900 · Youth Development703 WARRIORS: $2,500 · Youth DevelopmentKauai Animal Education Center: $20,000 · Animals
Other$797,522Education$127,457Health$83,460Philanthropy$75,000Human Services$68,060Youth Development$29,400Animals$20,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetOZAUKEE CHRISTIAN SCHOOL INC: $91,000 over 4y, 6.0% of budgetCHARITYEZ INC: $75,000 over 1y, 47% of budgetCHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF WISCONSIN INC: $59,260 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCornerstone of Grace: $55,360 over 3y, 13% of budgetMILWAUKEE YOUTH THEATRE INC: $40,000 over 2y, 18% of budgetTHE PRAIRIE SCHOOL INC: $27,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetHEAT ATHLETICS INC: $25,000 over 1y, 4.8% of budgetKauai Animal Education Center: $20,000 over 2y, 8.5% of budgetMAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF WISCONSIN INC: $18,500 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetSIEBERT LUTHERAN FOUNDATION INC: $16,500 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetWISH FOR OUR HEROES INC: $10,075 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetBLOOM360 LEARNING COMMUNITY INC: $9,207 over 2y, 1.1% of budgetPROFESSIONAL FIRE FIGHTERS OF WISCONSIN CHARITABLE FOUNDATION INC: $7,000 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetKAUAI NORTH SHORE FOOD PANTRY: $5,000 over 1y, 3.3% of budgetA Doll Like Me INC: $5,000 over 1y, 6.7% of budgetLIFECAMP USA INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetMuskego Food Pantry Inc: $5,000 over 1y, 4.1% of budgetJACARRIE KICKS FOR KIDS INC: $2,900 over 1y, 1.4% of budget703 WARRIORS: $2,500 over 1y, 5.4% of budgetKINDRED EXCHANGE INC: $1,500 over 1y, 1.5% of budgetFaith Hope & Love Inc: $1,400 over 1y, 2.0% of budgetLutherdale Bible Camp Inc: $1,150 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc: $700 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSERENITY INNS INC: $600 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN - EAU CLAIRE FOUNDATION INC: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJOBSWORK MKE INC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds OZAUKEE CHRISTIAN SCHOOL INC ↗
  • Who funds CHARITYEZ INC ↗
  • Who funds CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF WISCONSIN INC ↗
  • Who funds Cornerstone of Grace ↗
  • Who funds MILWAUKEE YOUTH THEATRE INC ↗
  • Who funds THE PRAIRIE SCHOOL INC ↗
  • Who funds HEAT ATHLETICS INC ↗
  • Who funds Kauai Animal Education Center ↗
  • Who funds HOPE THROUGH RESTORATION INC ↗
  • Who funds MAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF WISCONSIN INC ↗
  • Who funds SIEBERT LUTHERAN FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds WISH FOR OUR HEROES INC ↗
  • Who funds BLOOM360 LEARNING COMMUNITY INC ↗
  • Who funds PROFESSIONAL FIRE FIGHTERS OF WISCONSIN CHARITABLE FOUNDATION INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Greater Milwaukee Foundation IncWI22.5× affinity9 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Greater Milwaukee Foundation Inc · Baird Foundation Inc · Siebert Lutheran Foundation Inc · The Lynde and Harry Bradley Foundation Inc · Green Bay Packers Foundation · Thrivent Charitable Impact & Investing · The Ros Foundation · Harley-Davidson Foundation Inc · United Way of Greater Milwaukee & Waukesha County Inc · Church Mutual Insurance Company Foundation Inc · Herbert H Kohl Charities Inc · Thrivent Financial for Lutherans

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Mars Family Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Mars Family Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%3%13%28%50%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Mars Family Foundation Inc?

    Find your warmest path to Mars Family Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 80 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Mars Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph