· Public charity
Marketing Association for Rehabilitation Centers Inc
Marc will serve as a catalyst for innovations that improve the economic and social quality of life for people with disabilities and disadvantages.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2022–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- $10k–50k7 grants · $304k
- $50k–250k1 grant · $56k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| WESTBRIDGE VOCATIONAL INC | $56,000 |
| WATAUGA OPPORTUNITIES INC | $48,000 |
| FOOTHILLS INDUSTRIES | $48,000 |
| O E ENTERPRISES | $48,000 |
| INDUSTRIAL OPPORTUNITIES INC | $48,000 |
| JOHNSTON COUNTY INDUSTRIES INC | $40,000 |
| POLK VOCATIONAL SERVICES | $40,000 |
| HAYWOOD VOCATIONAL OPPORTUNITIES IN | $32,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY22–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 87% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +17% since the first grant, against 0% for the ones you funded once.
8 repeat relationships — 7 still active in FY2025, 1 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 87% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $48k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- IOINDUSTRIAL OPPORTUNITIES INC3× · 2023–2025 · $152k · revenue +17%
- WVWESTBRIDGE VOCATIONAL INC3× · 2023–2025 · $136k · revenue +25%
- PCPOLK COUNTY SHELTERED WORKSHOP INC3× · 2023–2025 · $136k · revenue +18%
Funded once
- OEOE ENTERPRISES INCORPORATEDone grant, 2025 · $48k · revenue 0%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To provide job training and work opportunity for disabled individuals in iron county, missouri.
Sheltered workshop providing employment to developmentally disabled individuals.
To provide employment opportunities for individuals with disabilities through rehabilitation and training.
To conduct an extended employment sheltered workshop program, to provide productive employment to persons with disabilities over the age of 16 years, and to provide other vocational or habilitative programs which enhance the development of…
Serving adults with disabilities by providing opportunities for economic and personal development.
Promoting self-determination, self-respect and valued participation in the community for persons with disabilities.
To offer employment training to mentally and developmentally disabled indidividuals.
To provide a suitable place of employment for the mentally and physically handicapped where they can have the opportunity to make choices and realize their goals, accomplishments, and achievements
Training/placement of disabled workforce
Organized to provide vocational assessment, work adjustment training and day activity to physically, mentally, or emotionally handicapped adults; to develop work skills leading to employment and/or daily living skills to increase…
Employ handicapped persons. the workshop provides productive employment fortrainable mentally and physically handicapped individuals
To provide jobs and training to individuals who, due to physical or mental handicaps, have been unable to obtain a regular position in the workforce of the community. basic skills such as mathematics and personal grooming are taught by the…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Transylvania Vocational Services in and the most unlike its peers is Industrial Opportunities Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds FOOTHILLS INDUSTRIES OF MCDOWELL COUNTY INC ↗
- Who funds INDUSTRIAL OPPORTUNITIES INC ↗
- Who funds WESTBRIDGE VOCATIONAL INC ↗
- Who funds POLK COUNTY SHELTERED WORKSHOP INC ↗
- Who funds JOHNSTON COUNTY INDUSTRIES INC ↗
- Who funds WATAUGA OPPORTUNITIES INC ↗
- Who funds HAYWOOD VOCATIONAL OPPORTUNITIES INC ↗
- Who funds TRANSYLVANIA VOCATIONAL SERVICES IN ↗
- Who funds OE ENTERPRISES INCORPORATED ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a set of overlaps that mostly run through you, not between each other.
Open a dossier: The Cannon Foundation Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Marketing Association for Rehabilitation Centers Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.