Skip to content

· Private foundation

Mark and Lisa Ratner Family Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$140k
Granted FY2025still arriving
27
Grants FY2025still arriving
6
States reached
$50k
Largest
01What it funds
0194% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2021 to 2025.

Philanthropy$451kReligion$97kEducation$79kInternational$42kHuman Services$32kRecreation & Sports$15kYouth Development$14kPublic Safety & Disaster$10kOther$0
02FY2025 · 27 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k21 grants · $40k
  • $10k–50k5 grants · $50k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $50k
$1,000
Median grant
6
States reached
$5.4M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
AMOS AND CELIA HEILICHER MINNEAPOLIS JEWISH DAY SCHOOL$50,000
PJ LIBRARY$10,000
SECURE COMMUNITY NETWORK$10,000
MINNESOTA HILLEL$10,000
AMERICAN ISRAEL EDUCATION FOUNDATION (AIPAC)$10,000
BETH EL FOUNDATION OF MINNESOTA INC$10,000
HERZL CAMP FOUNDATION INC$8,250
SHOLOM FOUNDATION$7,200
EMISSASRY$5,570
JEWISH FEDERATION OF GREATER NAPLES INC$5,087
JEWISH YOUTH LIBRARY$3,600
Individual grant recipient$2,500
CHABAD YOUNG PROFESSIONALS$1,556
GEMILUS CHESED ZICHRON SOCIETY (GCZS)$1,000
Individual grant recipient$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–25, $30k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%JEWISH FAMILY AND CHILDREN'S SERVICE OF MINNEAPOLIS: $25 → 11%JEWISH FAMILY AND CHILDREN'S SERVICE OF MINNEAPOLIS: $25 → 11%SHOLOM FOUNDATION: $7k → 11%SHOLOM FOUNDATION: $7k → 11%SHOLOM FOUNDATION: $6k → 11%SHOLOM FOUNDATION: $6k → 11%SHOLOM FOUNDATION: $5k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
MN
IL
MI
NY
MA
CA
DC
GA
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 30% of Mark and Lisa Ratner Family Foundation Inc’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address.

Mark and Lisa Ratner Family Foundation Inclessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 2.1% directed abroad (not shown)
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

93%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$488k · 19 repeat orgs$36k to everyone else

19 repeat relationships: 12 still active in FY2025, 7 since wound down; 14 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

19
9

Total granted

$488k
$4k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+9%
+16%

Still filing today

58%
78%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 76% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $32k went to new ones.

50%100%’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’21’22’23’24’25
HealthPhilanthropyInternationalHuman ServicesReligionEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • HA
    HAROLD AND MICKEY SMITH JEWISH ACADEMY
    4× · 2021–2025 · $68k · revenue +106%
  • SF
    SHOLOM FOUNDATION
    5× · 2021–2025 · $30k · revenue +9%
  • MB
    MICHIGAN B'NAI B'RITH HILLEL FOUNDATION INC
    3× · 2021–2023 · $2k · revenue +41%

Funded once

  • P
    PANCANORG
    one grant, 2024 · $1k
  • HA
    HOPE ACADEMY INCgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $1k · revenue +158%
  • Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc
    one grant, 2023 · $1k · revenue +16%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Minneapolis Jewish Federation

Minneapolis jewish federation is a nonprofit organization that promotes a culture of philanthropy, leverages resources to meet local and global jewish needs, and facilitates community planning to ensure a thriving and secure future.

Philanthropy
2
The Shalom Hartman Institute of North America

The shalom hartman institute (shi) is a leading research and educational center serving israel and world jewry. we work to enrich the moral and spiritual life of israel and the jewish people, deepen the commitment to pluralism and israel's…

International
3
Minnesota Jewish Community Center Foundation

The minnesota jcc foundation's sole purpose is to support the minnesota jcc.

Human Services
4
The Jewish Agency for Israel

The jewish agency binds jews across ideologies and civilizations together in a worldwide jewish family with israel at its center. it provides the global framework for aliyah, ensures global jewish safety, strengthens jewish identity and…

—
5
Jewish Federation Council of Greater La

Based on jewish values, the jewish federation of greater los angeles convenes and leads the community and leverages its resources to assure the continuity of the jewish people, support a secure state of israel, care for jews in need here…

Philanthropy
6
The Jewish Fund

The jewish fund is organized and operates exclusively for charitable, educational, and religious purposes. the fund's primary activities are: supporting a jewish health care mission in the greater detroit area and michigan; promotion of…

Philanthropy
7
Jewish Senior Life

To enhance the quality of life, health, and well-being of jewish older adults, their families, and others in our community, consistent with the values and traditions of our jewish heritage.

Religion
8
Metropolitan Jewish Health System Inc

Mjhs health system is a charitable not-for-profit established to support the activities of affiliated organizations. mjhs is built on the core values of compassion, dignity and respect, first established by the four brooklyn ladies in…

Health
9
Israeli-American Council

The organization's mission is to build an engaged and united israeli-american community that strengthens the israeli and jewish identity of our next generation, the american-jewish community and the bond between the peoples of the united…

Human Services
10
Jewish Family and Children's Service Inc

Strengthening the community by providing behavioral health, healthcare and social services to all ages, faiths and backgrounds.

Human Services
11
Jewish Childrens Museum

To further jewish historical education among youths

Arts & Culture
12
Abraham Joshua Heschel Day School

Abraham joshua heschel day school cultivates students' natural sense of wonder into an exceptionally rich education that encourages critical thinking, creativity, and compassion. in partnership with our families, we inspire our students to…

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Jewish Family and Children's Service of Minneapolis; the most unlike its peers is Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

20 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 20 of the 43 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
20/20
Grantees still filing
12/20
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

JEWISH FEDERATION OF GREATER NAPLES INC: $225,105 · OtherJEWISH FEDERATION OF GREATER NAPLES INCMINNEAPOLIS JEWISH FEDERATION (KADIMA): $150,999 · OtherMINNEAPOLIS JEWISH FEDERATION (KADIMA)MINNEAPOLIS JEWISH FEDERATION (WCA): $75,090 · OtherMINNEAPOLIS JEWISH FEDERATION (WCA)HAROLD AND MICKEY SMITH JEWISH ACADEMY: $68,000 · OtherHAROLD AND MICKEY SMITH JEWISH ACADEMYMINNESOTA HILLEL: $22,000 · Other+23 more: $61,983 · Other+23 moreBETH EL FOUNDATION OF MINNESOTA INC: $47,200 · Philanthropy+1 more: $100 · PhilanthropyAMERICAN ISRAEL EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC: $41,000 · International+1 more: $150 · InternationalSHOLOM FOUNDATION: $29,700 · Human Services+1 more: $50 · Human ServicesHERZL CAMP FOUNDATION: $14,868 · ReligionSECURE COMMUNITY NETWORK INC: $10,000 · Public Safety & DisasterDana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc: $1,000 · HealthSMILE NETWORK INTERNATIONAL: $500 · HealthAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC: $211 · HealthALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC: $150 · Health+2 more: $91 · HealthHOPE ACADEMY INC: $1,000 · Education
Other$603,177Philanthropy$47,300International$41,150Human Services$29,750Religion$14,868Public Safety & Disaster$10,000Health$1,952Education$1,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetJEWISH FEDERATION OF GREATER NAPLES INC: $225,105 over 5y, 4.2% of budgetHAROLD AND MICKEY SMITH JEWISH ACADEMY: $68,000 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetBETH EL FOUNDATION OF MINNESOTA INC: $47,200 over 5y, 1.7% of budgetAMERICAN ISRAEL EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC: $41,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetSHOLOM FOUNDATION: $29,700 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetMINNESOTA HILLEL: $22,000 over 5y, 0.7% of budgetHERZL CAMP FOUNDATION: $14,868 over 5y, 0.6% of budgetMINNESOTA JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER: $2,650 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMICHIGAN B'NAI B'RITH HILLEL FOUNDATION INC: $1,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetHOPE ACADEMY INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSMILE NETWORK INTERNATIONAL: $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC: $211 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC: $150 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetThe Borgen Project: $150 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGOFUNDMEORG: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetRonald McDonald House Charities - Upper Midwest: $61 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetJEWISH FAMILY AND CHILDREN'S SERVICE OF MINNEAPOLIS: $50 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSEMPER FI & AMERICA'S FUND: $30 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds JEWISH FEDERATION OF GREATER NAPLES INC ↗
  • Who funds HAROLD AND MICKEY SMITH JEWISH ACADEMY ↗
  • Who funds BETH EL FOUNDATION OF MINNESOTA INC ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN ISRAEL EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds SHOLOM FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds MINNESOTA HILLEL ↗
  • Who funds HERZL CAMP FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds SECURE COMMUNITY NETWORK INC ↗
  • Who funds MINNESOTA JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER ↗
  • Who funds MICHIGAN B'NAI B'RITH HILLEL FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds HOPE ACADEMY INC ↗
  • Who funds Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc ↗
  • Who funds SMILE NETWORK INTERNATIONAL ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC ↗
  • Who funds ALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC ↗
  • Who funds The Borgen Project ↗
  • Who funds GOFUNDMEORG ↗
  • Who funds Ronald McDonald House Charities - Upper Midwest ↗
  • Who funds JEWISH FAMILY AND CHILDREN'S SERVICE OF MINNEAPOLIS ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Minneapolis FoundationMN24.1× affinity10 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Minneapolis Foundation · Saint Paul & Minnesota Foundation · Mike & Linda Fiterman Family Foundation · Elmar Family Foundation · Lynne & Andrew Redleaf Foundation · Mightycause Charitable Foundation · Baird Foundation Inc · Oren and Sharron Steinfeldt Foundation · Alex G & Mollie Tankenoff Family Foundation · The Cdf Foundation · Marshall & Elaine Siegel Foundation · Robert and Susan Diamond Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Mark and Lisa Ratner Family Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Mark and Lisa Ratner Family Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →median 7%
  • Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc: 7% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Mark and Lisa Ratner Family Foundation Inc?

Find your warmest path to Mark and Lisa Ratner Family Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 43 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Mark and Lisa Ratner Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph