Skip to content

New Jersey · Private foundation

Mark and Judith Cook Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$570k
Granted FY2025(still arriving)
18
Grants FY2025
9
Organizations funded FY2024
44%
First-time grantees FY2024
Read the full brief
Median grant, FY2025
$25,000
Largest grant, FY2025
$125,000
Organizations funded a year
3 to 9
FY2018 to FY2024
States reached, FY2025
4
Total assets, FY2025
$9.4M
Applications
Takes unsolicited applications
Per its most recent filing; check its own site

How open it is to new grantees

In FY2024, 44% of the organizations Mark and Judith Cook Foundation funded were first-time grantees, receiving 36% of its grant dollars.

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 64% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $107k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
HealthPublic Safety & DisasterArts & CultureEducationCrime & LegalYouth DevelopmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
The numbers by year
Fiscal yearOrganizations fundedTo those organizationsFirst-time grantees
FY2025still arriving18$570k56%
FY20249$298k44%
FY20234$137k50%
FY20225$480k60%
FY20213$417k33%
FY20204$505k25%
FY20194$750k0%
FY20184$750k0%
100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Education$2.9MHealth$601kHuman Services$522kArts & Culture$145kFood & Nutrition$90kPublic Safety & Disaster$60kCrime & Legal$30kPhilanthropy$15kOther$0

Top grantees

Largest recipients by total granted, FY2017 to FY2025, and the share of each one’s budget the grants supplied at peak.

Show all 20 grantees

What it could do for these grantees

Plus 5 recipients with no EIN on record ($2.9M), not named here.

Where it is load-bearing

Mark and Judith Cook Foundation supplied at least a quarter of the budget for 1 of its grantees at some point. The chart plots its 19 largest grantees; load-bearing ones sit top left.

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTamina Community Center: $472,000 over 9y, 59% of budgetTexas Children's Hospital: $400,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetCHRISTUS Foundation for HealthCare: $124,650 over 2y, 1.5% of budgetWest Street Recovery: $60,000 over 3y, 0.7% of budgetHouston Public Media Foundation: $60,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetChristus Health: $59,825 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetConroe Art League Inc: $50,000 over 2y, 21% of budgetMontgomery County Food Bank Inc: $45,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetJefferson County Library Foundation: $30,000 over 2y, 1.2% of budgetSHAPE Community Center: $25,000 over 1y, 2.1% of budgetHouston Public Library Foundation: $20,000 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetArt Students League of Denver: $20,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetShare Our Strength: $15,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetThe Houston Food Bank: $15,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUnited Way of Greater Houston: $15,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLone Star Community Health Center: $12,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJail Project of Texas: $10,000 over 1y, 3.5% of budgetThe Training Kitchen: $7,500 over 1y, 8.3% of budgetDoctors for Change: $5,000 over 1y, 2.8% of budget

Tap a dot to name the grantee.

How this is measured
Share of budget is the funder’s grant in a year over the grantee’s total revenue that year, at its highest across the years we hold; revenue is from all sources. Only grantees confirmed against their own filings, whose grants do not exceed their revenue, are plotted: the largest 19.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Houston Endowment IncTX15.5× affinity5 shared granteesties to 4 of 4Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Houston Endowment Inc · United Way of Greater Houston · Shell USA Company Foundation · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Compare Mark and Judith Cook Foundation with peer funders

About Mark and Judith Cook Foundation

How much does Mark and Judith Cook Foundation give?
Mark and Judith Cook Foundation reported 18 grants totaling $570,000 in its FY2025 IRS filing. It funded between 3 and 9 organizations a year over FY2018 to FY2024.
What does Mark and Judith Cook Foundation fund?
By grant dollars over FY2017 to FY2025, its largest causes are Education (66%), Health (14%), Human Services (12%).
Who are Mark and Judith Cook Foundation's largest grantees?
By total granted over FY2017 to FY2025: Tamina Community Center ($472k), Texas Children's Hospital ($400k), CHRISTUS Foundation for HealthCare ($125k).
Does Mark and Judith Cook Foundation fund new organizations?
In FY2024, 44% of the organizations it funded were first-time grantees.
Does Mark and Judith Cook Foundation accept unsolicited applications?
Its most recent filing reports that it accepts unsolicited grant applications.
Which funders back the same organizations as Mark and Judith Cook Foundation?
Its strongest co-funders, measured against what their size predicts, include Houston Endowment Inc, United Way of Greater Houston, Shell USA Company Foundation.
Where is Mark and Judith Cook Foundation based?
Mark and Judith Cook Foundation is based in NJ.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 25 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Mark and Judith Cook’s filings →

More from the funding graph