Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Marjorie W Sloper Charitable Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$45k
Granted FY2024still arriving
15
Grants FY2024still arriving
4
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172024.

Health$148kMembership Benefit$30kPhilanthropy$26kPublic Safety & Disaster$25kEducation$24kReligion$19kHuman Services$12kYouth Development$3kOther$0
02FY2024 · 15 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k14 grants · $35k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $10k
$2,500
Median grant
4
States reached
$406k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
DANA FARBER CANCER INSTITUTE$10,000
OFFICER HAROLD VITALE MEMORIAL FUND$5,300
NATIONAL MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS$5,000
WILDCAT RUN CHARITABLE FOUNDATION$5,000
OUR LADY OF LIGHT PARISH$3,500
BENTLEY UNIVERSITY$3,000
BETH ISRAEL LAHEY MEDICAL CENTER$3,000
WINDWARD SAILS CHARITABLE FOUNDATION$2,500
NATIONAL KIDNEY FOUNDATION OF FLORIDA$1,500
WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT$1,000
BOSTON CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL TRUST$1,000
ALZHEIMERS ASSOCIATION MASS CHAPTER$1,000
SHRINERS HOSPITAL$1,000
JOSLIN DIABETES CENTER$1,000
TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION$1,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $8k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT: $1k → 14%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT: $1k → 14%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT: $1k → 14%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT: $1k → 14%WINDWARD SAILS CHARITABLE FOUNDATION: $3k → 10%WINDWARD SAILS CHARITABLE FOUNDATION: $1k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

99%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$284k · 19 repeat orgs$4k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +69% since the first grant, against +36% for the ones you funded once.

19 repeat relationships — 15 still active in FY2024, 4 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

19
4

Total granted

$284k
$4k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+69%
+36%

Still filing today

47%
25%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
HealthPhilanthropyEducationHuman ServicesOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc
    8× · 2017–2024 · $55k · revenue +132%
  • WR
    WILDCAT RUN CHARITABLE FOUNDATION INC
    7× · 2017–2024 · $25k · revenue +146%
  • BENTLEY UNIVERSITY
    8× · 2017–2024 · $22k · revenue +39%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2017 · $1k
  • MC
    MARIE C PETRILLI MEMORIAL FUND
    one grant, 2018 · $1k
  • SA
    ST ANNE'S PARISH
    one grant, 2019 · $1k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Johns Hopkins Hospital

For more than 125 years, the mission of the johns hopkins hospital has been to lead the world in the diagnosis and treatment of disease and to train tomorrow's great physicians, nurses and scientists. above all, we aim to provide the…

Health
2
Joslin Clinic Inc

To provide the highest quality specialty medical care to patients with diabetes and diabetes related conditions and to search for a cure.

Health
3
Winchester Hospital

The mission of winchester hospital is "to care. to heal. to excel." this ethos provides each and every staff member with clear expectations, promoting teamwork and respect while ensuring safety, quality and empathy for patients. winchester…

Health
4
Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center

Leadership in the prevention, treatment, and cure of cancer through excellence, vision and cost effectiveness in patient care, outreach programs, research, and education.

Health
5
Mass General Brigham Incorporated & Affiliates Group Return

Mass general brigham incorporated is developing an integrated health care delivery system throughout the region that offers patients a continuum of coordinated, high-quality care.

Health
6
Beth Israel Deaconess Hospital - Milton

The mission of the beth israel deaconess hospital-milton, inc. (bid-milton or hospital) is to provide safe, high-quality, community-based health care and access to tertiary care in close collaboration with its sister hospital, beth israel…

Health
7
Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center Inc

Tertiary care academic medical center

Health
8
Beth Israel Lahey Health Inc

Beth israel lahey health inc.'s mission is to support its affiliates and their healthcare missions, to improve the health of patients, their families and the communities served and as a network its purpose is to create healthier…

Health
9
Sanford Burnham Prebys Medical Discovery Institute

Sanford burnham prebys medical discovery institute's mission is to advance the biomedical sciences by cultivating the next generation of scientific leaders, providing meaningful opportunities for researchers of all backgrounds to learn,…

Health
10
Beth Israel Deaconess Hospital-Plymouth Inc

The mission of the beth israel deaconess hospital-plymouth, inc. (bid-plymouth or hospital) is to improve the health and well-being of its patients and communities by providing a full continuum of healthcare services with excellence and…

Health
11
Western New England University

Western new england university, a comprehensive private institution with a tradition of excellence in teaching and scholarship and a commitment to service, awards undergraduate, master's, and doctoral degrees in various departments from…

Education
12
Anna Jaques Hospital Inc

The mission of anna jaques hospital (ajh or hospital) is to provide the highest quality medical care and improve the health of the communities served by ajh in alliance with the ajh medical staff and ajh affiliates including seacoast…

Health

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Wounded Warrior Project Inc and the most unlike its peers is Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 23 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/10
Grantees still filing
9/10
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

MS GREATER NEW ENGLAND CHAPTER — $30,000 · OtherMS GREATER NEW ENGLAND CHAPTERNATIONAL MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS — $28,500 · OtherNATIONAL MULTIPLE SCLEROSISOFFICER HAROLD VITALE MEMORIAL FUND — $25,300 · OtherOFFICER HAROLD VITALE MEMORIAL FUNDOUR LADY OF LIGHT CATHOLIC COMMUNITY — $17,500 · OtherOUR LADY OF LIGHT CATHOLIC COMMUNITYLINK UP FOR MS — $12,000 · OtherLINK UP FOR MSBETH ISRAEL LAHEY MEDICAL CENTER — $11,000 · OtherBETH ISRAEL LAHEY MEDICAL CENTERALZHEIMERS ASSOCIATION MASS CHAPTER — $9,500 · OtherALZHEIMERS ASSOCIATION MASS CHAPTERAUGIES QUEST — $5,500 · Other+5 more — $12,500 · Other+5 moreDana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc — $55,000 · HealthDana-Farber Cancer Institute …JOSLIN DIABETES CENTER INC — $8,000 · HealthJOSLIN DIABETES CENTER INCChildren's Hospital Corporation — $8,000 · HealthChildren's Hospital Corporati…NATIONAL KIDNEY FOUNDATION OF FLORIDA INC — $4,500 · HealthNATIONAL KIDNEY FOUNDATION OF…WILDCAT RUN CHARITABLE FOUNDATION INC — $24,500 · PhilanthropyWILDCAT RU…BOURQUE FAMILY FOUNDATION INC — $1,000 · PhilanthropyBENTLEY UNIVERSITY — $22,000 · EducationBENTLEY U…STEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION — $2,000 · EducationSTEPHEN S…WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC — $8,000 · Human ServicesWINDWARD SAILS CHARITABLE FOUNDATION INC — $3,500 · Human Services
Other$151,800Health$75,500Philanthropy$25,500Education$24,000Human Services$11,500

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetDana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc — $55,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetWILDCAT RUN CHARITABLE FOUNDATION INC — $24,500 over 7y, 5.0% of budgetBENTLEY UNIVERSITY — $22,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetJOSLIN DIABETES CENTER INC — $8,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC — $8,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetChildren's Hospital Corporation — $8,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL KIDNEY FOUNDATION OF FLORIDA INC — $4,500 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetWINDWARD SAILS CHARITABLE FOUNDATION INC — $3,500 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetSTEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION — $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBOURQUE FAMILY FOUNDATION INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc
  • Who funds WILDCAT RUN CHARITABLE FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds BENTLEY UNIVERSITY
  • Who funds JOSLIN DIABETES CENTER INC
  • Who funds WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC
  • Who funds Children's Hospital Corporation
  • Who funds NATIONAL KIDNEY FOUNDATION OF FLORIDA INC
  • Who funds WINDWARD SAILS CHARITABLE FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds STEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION
  • Who funds BOURQUE FAMILY FOUNDATION INC

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift FundMA5.3× affinity4 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Marjorie W Sloper Charitable Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 40%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 7%
  • Joslin Diabetes Center Inc35% of income from government
  • Children's Hospital Corporation10% of income from government
  • Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc7% of income from government
  • Bentley University1% of income from government
  • Wounded Warrior Project Inc0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
4get no government money at all
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 23 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph