· Private foundation
Marisa & Richard Stadtmauer Family Foundation Inc
Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).
A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 76% of MARISA & RICHARD STADTMAUER FAMILY FOUNDATION INC’s grantee dollars fall outside its nine largest cause areas, whether because the recipient carries no IRS cause code or because its cause sits in the long tail. A chart would be mostly one residual band and misrepresent the portfolio.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k24 grants · $58k
- $10k–50k18 grants · $325k
- $50k–250k2 grants · $157k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| SSTC RABBI DISCRETIONARY FUND | $106,903 |
| Individual grant recipient | $50,000 |
| JEWISH FUTURES FOUNDATION | $42,000 |
| ORA VSIMCHA FAMILY | $32,500 |
| JOSEPH KUSHNER HEBREW ACADEMY | $25,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $20,000 |
| MIKVAH CHANA | $19,980 |
| MAKING HEADWAY FOUNDATION INC | $18,000 |
| GEMILOS CHASADIN CHESEDEI MOSHE | $18,000 |
| FRIENDSHIP CIRCLE | $18,000 |
| AMERICAN FRIENDS OF NETIV ARYEH INC | $18,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $18,000 |
| AMERICAN FRIENDS OF MATAN INC | $18,000 |
| HALACHA EDUCATION CENTER | $17,500 |
| AISH GLOBAL | $10,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY18–24, $159k) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 99% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +38% since the first grant, against +22% for the ones you funded once.
47 repeat relationships — 21 still active in FY2024, 26 since wound down; 22 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 72% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $148k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- MCMIKVAH CHANA INC7× · 2017–2024 · $151k · revenue +48% · 26% of their budget
- ACAMERICAN COMMITTEE FOR SHAARE ZEDEK HOSPITAL IN JERUSALEM INC3× · 2017–2023 · $112k · revenue +89%
- CHCOLUMBIABARNARD HILLEL INC8× · 2017–2024 · $88k · revenue +80%
Funded once
- ZHZEDEK HOSPITALone grant, 2019 · $100k
- CHCHABAD HOUSE BOWERY INCone grant, 2018 · $72k
- CNCONGREGATION NISHMAS HATORAHone grant, 2021 · $40k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To further jewish education in israel
To promote, benefit, and support Jewish religious, charitable & educational activities in Israel and the USA.
To foster jewish religious education and disseminate the teachings of rabbi nachman of breslov through publication and distribution of books and cds, as well as seminars, lectures and study groups.
Religious School
To promote and foster the creation of a zionist intellectual infrastructure for the state of israel, the development of a jewish national culture, and the establishment and promotion of intellectual and economic liberty.
To support religious, charitable, scientific, literary and/or educational programs
Furtherance of jewish education
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Emunah of America Inc and the most unlike its peers is Regina Goldwasser Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 27 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 21% startups (under 5 years old) — 1% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 1% lost their exemption, against 11% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
49 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 49 of the 134 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds MIKVAH CHANA INC ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN COMMITTEE FOR SHAARE ZEDEK HOSPITAL IN JERUSALEM INC ↗
- Who funds COLUMBIABARNARD HILLEL INC ↗
- Who funds MAKING HEADWAY FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds THE FRIENDSHIP CIRCLE INC ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN FRIENDS OF YAD ELIEZER ↗
- Who funds SINAI SPECIAL NEEDS INSTITUTE INC ↗
- Who funds AISH GLOBAL INC ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN FRIENDS OF HERZOG HOSPITAL INC ↗
- Who funds MESORAH HERITAGE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds YESHIVA UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN FRIENDS OF NETIV ARYEH INC ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN FRIENDS OF MATAN INC ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN FRIENDS OF SULAMOT CORP ↗
- Who funds PROJECT MOSHIACH AWARENESS ↗
- Who funds AISH LIVINGSTON INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Jewish Communal Fund · Fjc · The Alan and Elisa Pines Family Foundation Inc · Jewish Community Foundation of Greater Metrowest NJ · Jewish Community Foundation of Los Angeles · Cd Foundation · Cross River Community Foundation · The Ojc Fund · Jack Adjmi Family Foundation Inc · Alyad Foundation Inc · Jewish Federation of Metropolitan Chicago · Melly & Rochelle Lifshitz Charitable Trust
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Marisa & Richard Stadtmauer Family Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Bais Yaakov of Boston Inc — 7% of income from government
- Rabbinical College of America — 5% of income from government
- Sharsheret Inc — 4% of income from government
- Chai 4EVER Inc — 2% of income from government
- Mesorah Heritage Foundation — 1% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.