Skip to content

· Private foundation

Marisa & Richard Stadtmauer Family Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$350k
Granted FY2025still arriving
39
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$41k
Largest
01What it funds
0185% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Religion$2.1MHealth$350kEducation$222kHuman Services$103kInternational$103kYouth Development$58kPhilanthropy$47kArts & Culture$28kOther$0
02FY2025 · 39 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k25 grants · $47k
  • $10k–50k14 grants · $303k
$3,600
Median grant
4
States reached
$5.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SSTC$40,500
CHEVRAT PINTO$36,000
ORA VSIMCHA FAMILY$32,200
SULAMOT MUSIC FOR SOCIAL CHANGE$30,000
Individual grant recipient$26,800
JOSEPH KUSHNER HEBREW ACADEMY$23,200
Individual grant recipient$20,000
FRIENDSHIP CIRCLE$18,000
MAKING HEADWAY FOUNDATION INC$18,000
Individual grant recipient$18,000
AMERICAN FRIENDS OF YA'ADIR TORAH$10,000
KOLLEL SHABBOS KODESH$10,000
COLUMBIA BARNARD HILLEL$10,000
AISH GLOBAL$10,000
CONG BROTHERS OF ISRAEL (NJ)$6,307
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–25, $179k) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 99% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%SHALVA: $5k → 14%NJ FORMER TROOPERS HERITAGE FOUND: $1k → 11%AMERICAN FRIENDS OF YAD ELIEZER: $18k → 20%CHAI 4 EVER: $5k → 11%AMERICAN FRIENDS OF YAD ELIEZER: $18k → 20%CHAI 4 EVER: $5k → 11%AMERICAN FRIENDS OF YAD ELIEZER: $18k → 20%AMERICAN FRIENDS OF YAD ELIEZER: $9k → 20%CHAI 4EVER INC: $1k → 11%FRIENDSHIP CIRCLE: $18k → 16%FRIENDSHIP CIRCLE: $18k → 16%FRIENDSHIP CIRCLE: $18k → 16%FRIENDSHIP CIRCLE: $18k → 16%FRIENDSHIP CIRCLE: $10k → 16%FRIENDSHIP CIRCLE: $4k → 16%JEWISH SERVICE FOR THE DEVELOPMENTALLY DISABLED OF METROWEST INC: $1k → 16%BONEI OLAM INC: $2k → 20%HEBREW FREE LOAN SOCIETY: $10k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
WI
NY
MA
OH
PA
NJ
CA
WV
MD
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

80%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$3.1M · 51 repeat orgs$771k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +38% since the first grant, against +5% for those funded once.

51 repeat relationships: 22 still active in FY2025, 29 since wound down; 17 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

51
81

Total granted

$3.1M
$675k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+38%
+5%

Still filing today

33%
36%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 73% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $96k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationInternationalHuman ServicesHealthReligionPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MC
    MIKVAH CHANA INC
    8× · 2017–2025 · $153k · revenue +48% · 26% of their budget
  • AC
    AMERICAN COMMITTEE FOR SHAARE ZEDEK HOSPITAL IN JERUSALEM INC
    3× · 2017–2023 · $112k · revenue +89%
  • MH
    MAKING HEADWAY FOUNDATION INC
    8× · 2017–2025 · $100k · revenue +7%

Funded once

  • ZH
    ZEDEK HOSPITAL
    one grant, 2019 · $100k
  • CH
    CHABAD HOUSE BOWERY INC
    one grant, 2018 · $72k
  • JF
    JEWISH FUTURES FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2024 · $42k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Sherit Isroel
—
2
Yeshiva Ohr Yisroel
Philanthropy
3
Zichron Avrohom Yosef
Philanthropy
4
American Friends of Oseh Chayil

To further jewish education in israel

Religion
5
American Friends of Yeshiva Aish Hatorah
—
6
American Friends of Ish El Rayahu

To promote, benefit, and support Jewish religious, charitable & educational activities in Israel and the USA.

Religion
7
University of Judaism Foundation
—
8
American Friends of Zvi Latzadik Dba Breslov Research Institute Jerusalem

To foster jewish religious education and disseminate the teachings of rabbi nachman of breslov through publication and distribution of books and cds, as well as seminars, lectures and study groups.

International
9
American Friends of Yeshivat Hakotel Inc

To support religious, charitable, scientific, literary and/or educational programs

Education
10
Zohar Hatorah Inc

Religious School

Religion
11
The Shalem Foundation

To promote and foster the creation of a zionist intellectual infrastructure for the state of israel, the development of a jewish national culture, and the establishment and promotion of intellectual and economic liberty.

Crime & Legal
12
Friends of Yeshiva Beer Abraham

Furtherance of jewish education

Religion
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Emunah of America Inc; the most unlike its peers is Regina Goldwasser Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

55 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 55 of the 151 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
7
Early backer (in before they grew)
54/55
Grantees still filing
32/55
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

SSTC RABBI DISCRETIONARY FUND: $369,741 · OtherSSTC RABBI DISCRETIONARY FUNDGEMILOS CHASADIN CHESEDEI MOSHE: $275,000 · OtherGEMILOS CHASADIN CHESEDEI MOSHESYNAGOGUE OF THE SUBURBAN TORAH CENTER: $177,058 · OtherSYNAGOGUE OF THE SUBURBAN TORAH CENTERJOSEPH KUSHNER HEBREW ACADEMY: $175,525 · OtherJOSEPH KUSHNER HEBREW ACADEMYHATZALAH OF WEST ORANGE: $160,000 · OtherHATZALAH OF WEST ORANGEORA VSIMCHA FAMILY: $153,900 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $150,000 · OtherCHEVRAT PINTO: $146,200 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $126,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $115,000 · OtherCONGREGATION BROTHERS OF ISRAEL: $114,200 · OtherZEDEK HOSPITAL: $100,000 · Other+93 more: $928,379 · Other+93 moreMIKVAH CHANA INC: $153,180 · ReligionMIKVAH CH…COLUMBIABARNARD HILLEL INC: $98,000 · ReligionCOLUMBIAB…AISH GLOBAL INC: $40,000 · ReligionAISH GLOB…AMERICAN FRIENDS OF NETIV ARYEH INC: $18,000 · ReligionAMERICAN …AISH LIVINGSTON INC: $12,000 · Religion+1 more: $5,000 · ReligionTHE FRIENDSHIP CIRCLE INC: $85,600 · Human ServicesAMERICAN FRIENDS OF YAD ELIEZER: $63,000 · Human ServicesCHAI 4EVER INC: $11,000 · Human ServicesHEBREW FREE LOAN SOCIETY INC: $10,000 · Human Services+4 more: $9,000 · Human ServicesMAKING HEADWAY FOUNDATION INC: $99,800 · HealthAMERICAN FRIENDS OF HERZOG HOSPITAL INC: $30,000 · HealthBIKUR CHOLIM OF MANHATTAN INC: $11,600 · Health+3 more: $4,392 · HealthAMERICAN COMMITTEE FOR SHAARE ZEDEK HOSPITAL IN JERUSALEM INC: $111,583 · InternationalAMERICAN FRIENDS OF YA'ADIR TORAH: $10,000 · InternationalCentral Fund of Israel: $6,300 · InternationalTeach for Israel Inc: $5,000 · International+5 more: $7,320 · InternationalYESHIVA UNIVERSITY: $23,300 · EducationAMERICAN FRIENDS OF SULAMOT CORP: $17,500 · EducationTHE ARI FULD PROJECT: $8,600 · EducationWEST HOLLYWOOD PRESCHOOL CENTER INC: $3,600 · EducationBAIS YAAKOV OF BOSTON INC: $3,000 · Education+4 more: $5,100 · EducationAMERICAN FRIENDS OF MATAN INC: $18,000 · PhilanthropyPROJECT MOSHIACH AWARENESS: $15,000 · PhilanthropyPEF ISRAEL ENDOWMENT FUNDS INC: $5,000 · PhilanthropyBETTER FUTURE FOR ISRAEL: $2,000 · PhilanthropyTHE MIAMI FOUNDATION INC: $1,800 · PhilanthropyREGINA GOLDWASSER FOUNDATION: $1,800 · Philanthropy+2 more: $1,120 · Philanthropy
Other$2,991,003Religion$326,180Human Services$178,600Health$145,792International$140,203Education$61,100Philanthropy$44,720

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetMIKVAH CHANA INC: $153,180 over 8y, 26% of budgetAMERICAN COMMITTEE FOR SHAARE ZEDEK HOSPITAL IN JERUSALEM INC: $111,583 over 3y, 0.6% of budgetMAKING HEADWAY FOUNDATION INC: $99,800 over 8y, 1.9% of budgetCOLUMBIABARNARD HILLEL INC: $98,000 over 9y, 0.6% of budgetTHE FRIENDSHIP CIRCLE INC: $85,600 over 6y, 4.9% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF YAD ELIEZER: $63,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetAISH GLOBAL INC: $40,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetSINAI SPECIAL NEEDS INSTITUTE INC: $30,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF HERZOG HOSPITAL INC: $30,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetMESORAH HERITAGE FOUNDATION: $25,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetYESHIVA UNIVERSITY: $23,300 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF NETIV ARYEH INC: $18,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF MATAN INC: $18,000 over 1y, 1.6% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF SULAMOT CORP: $17,500 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetPROJECT MOSHIACH AWARENESS: $15,000 over 1y, 4.0% of budgetAISH LIVINGSTON INC: $12,000 over 1y, 30% of budgetBIKUR CHOLIM OF MANHATTAN INC: $11,600 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetCHAI 4EVER INC: $11,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetHEBREW FREE LOAN SOCIETY INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetTHE ARI FULD PROJECT: $8,600 over 1y, 9.6% of budgetCentral Fund of Israel: $6,300 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetZAMIR CHORAL FOUNDATION INC: $5,400 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetSHALVA INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetTeach for Israel Inc: $5,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF ISRAEL EMERGENCY AID FUND: $5,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetFRIENDS OF UNITED HATZALAH INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPEF ISRAEL ENDOWMENT FUNDS INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetOhr Torah Stone Institutions of Israel: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetFRIENDS OF THE ISRAEL DEFENSE FORCES: $3,600 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBAIS YAAKOV OF BOSTON INC: $3,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetCHAI LIFELINE INC: $2,874 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetBETTER FUTURE FOR ISRAEL: $2,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetBonei Olam Inc: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE MIAMI FOUNDATION INC: $1,800 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetYESHIVA BAIS MORDECHAI OF TEANECK: $1,800 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetREGINA GOLDWASSER FOUNDATION: $1,800 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetSHEFA SCHOOL: $1,800 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSharsheret Inc: $1,418 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetPLEDGER CHARITABLE LTD: $1,300 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetRABBINICAL COLLEGE OF AMERICA: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJUST ONE LIFE INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSARCOMA FOUNDATION OF AMERICA: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJEWISH SERVICE FOR THE DEVELOPMENTALLY DISABLED OF METROWEST INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNE EMAN FOUNDATION USA: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICA GIVES INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFUND FOR ISRAEL'S TOMORROW: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNJ FORMER TROOPERS HERITAGE FOUNDATION INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetEMUNAH OF AMERICA INC: $720 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds MIKVAH CHANA INC ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN COMMITTEE FOR SHAARE ZEDEK HOSPITAL IN JERUSALEM INC ↗
  • Who funds MAKING HEADWAY FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds COLUMBIABARNARD HILLEL INC ↗
  • Who funds THE FRIENDSHIP CIRCLE INC ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN FRIENDS OF YAD ELIEZER ↗
  • Who funds AISH GLOBAL INC ↗
  • Who funds SINAI SPECIAL NEEDS INSTITUTE INC ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN FRIENDS OF HERZOG HOSPITAL INC ↗
  • Who funds MESORAH HERITAGE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds YESHIVA UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN FRIENDS OF NETIV ARYEH INC ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN FRIENDS OF MATAN INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Jewish Communal FundNY42.3× affinity35 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Jewish Communal Fund · Fjc · The Alan and Elisa Pines Family Foundation Inc · Jewish Community Foundation of Greater Metrowest NJ · Jewish Community Foundation of Los Angeles · Cd Foundation · Cross River Community Foundation · The Ojc Fund · Jack Adjmi Family Foundation Inc · Alyad Foundation Inc · Jewish Federation of Metropolitan Chicago · Melly & Rochelle Lifshitz Charitable Trust

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Marisa & Richard Stadtmauer Family Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Marisa & Richard Stadtmauer Family Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 140%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government →median 4%
  • Bais Yaakov of Boston Inc: 7% of income from government
  • Rabbinical College of America: 5% of income from government
  • Sharsheret Inc: 4% of income from government
  • Chai 4EVER Inc: 2% of income from government
  • Mesorah Heritage Foundation: 1% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
14get no government money at all
5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 151 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Marisa & Richard Stadtmauer Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph