Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

Marine Corps Aviation Association Community Services Inc

Support Active Duty and Reserve Marines through enhanced educational opportunities, such as funding of guest lecturers or technical experts to augment university staffs support other liked-minded charitable organizations that benefit Marines and Marine families support existing scholarships within the Association.

$345k
Granted FY2025still arriving
7
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$75k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY20222025.

Education$600kHealth$420kPhilanthropy$175kHuman Services$50k
02FY2025 · 7 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k4 grants · $120k
  • $50k–250k3 grants · $225k
$40,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Semper Fi & Americas Fund$75,000
Marine Corps Scholarship Fdn$75,000
Marine Corps Law Enforce Fdn$75,000
Hope for the Warriors$40,000
Navy Marine Corps PROUD Fdn$30,000
Warriors & Quiet Waters Fdn$30,000
Sugar Bear Foundation$20,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY22–25, $50k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 7%Sugar Bear Foundation: $20k → 11%Sugar Bear Foundation: $10k → 11%Sugar Bear Foundation: $10k → 11%Sugar Bear Foundation: $10k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

100%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$1.2M · 7 repeat orgs$0 to everyone else

7 repeat relationships — 7 still active in FY2025, 0 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

7
0

Total granted

$1.2M
$0

Still filing today

100%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’22’23’24’25
EducationHealthPhilanthropyHuman ServicesOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MC
    MARINE CORPS SCHOLARSHIP FOUNDATION INC
    4× · 2022–2025 · $300k · revenue +5%
  • MC
    MARINE CORPS-LAW ENFORCEMENT FOUNDA FOUNDATION INC
    4× · 2022–2025 · $300k · revenue +152%
  • SF
    SEMPER FI & AMERICA'S FUND
    4× · 2022–2025 · $300k · revenue +8%

Funded once

    Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

    04Your field
    04the grantee network

    7 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

    Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

    Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover.

    1
    Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
    3
    Early backer (in before they grew)
    7/7
    Grantees still filing
    6/7
    Grew since you first funded

    Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

    MARINE CORPS SCHOLARSHIP FOUNDATION INC — $300,000 · EducationMARINE CORPS SCHOLARSHIP FOUNDATION INCMARINE CORPS-LAW ENFORCEMENT FOUNDA FOUNDATION INC — $300,000 · EducationMARINE CORPS-LAW ENFORCEMENT FOUNDA FOUNDATION INCSEMPER FI & AMERICA'S FUND — $300,000 · HealthSEMPER FI & AMERICA'S FUNDWARRIORS & QUIET WATERS FOUNDATION INC — $120,000 · HealthWARRIORS & QUIET WATERS FOUNDATION INCHope For The Warriors — $100,000 · PhilanthropyHope For The Wa…NAVY MARINE CORPS PROUD FOUNDATION INC — $75,000 · PhilanthropyNAVY MARINE COR…SUGAR BEAR FOUNDATION — $50,000 · Human Services
    Education$600,000Health$420,000Philanthropy$175,000Human Services$50,000

    Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

    25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetMARINE CORPS SCHOLARSHIP FOUNDATION INC — $300,000 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetMARINE CORPS-LAW ENFORCEMENT FOUNDA FOUNDATION INC — $300,000 over 4y, 1.8% of budgetSEMPER FI & AMERICA'S FUND — $300,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetWARRIORS & QUIET WATERS FOUNDATION INC — $120,000 over 4y, 0.8% of budgetHope For The Warriors — $100,000 over 4y, 0.7% of budgetNAVY MARINE CORPS PROUD FOUNDATION INC — $75,000 over 4y, 31% of budgetSUGAR BEAR FOUNDATION — $50,000 over 4y, 9.7% of budget
    Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

    A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

    The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a set of overlaps that mostly run through you, not between each other.

    Amazonsmile FoundationWA3.2× affinity4 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

    Open a dossier: Amazonsmile Foundation

    Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

    Government reliance of your grantees

    Every dot is one organization Marine Corps Aviation Association Community Services Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

    2024
    202122232425
    no gov · 00%3%10%23%40%your share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government
      no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
      0get no government money at all
      1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
      0rely on government for over half their income
      ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
      typical government reliance, FY2025

      Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

      05Through Plinth

      Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

      How do I get to Marine Corps Aviation Association Community Services Inc?

      Find your warmest path to Marine Corps Aviation Association Community Services Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

      Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

      On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 7 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

      Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

      Source object · view filing

      More from the funding graph