Skip to content

· Private foundation

Margie L Brown Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$27k
Granted FY2025still arriving
14
Grants FY2025still arriving
6
States reached
$7k
Largest
01What it funds
0194% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Philanthropy$85kReligion$66kArts & Culture$23kEducation$23kFood & Nutrition$10kHealth$1kHuman Services$529Civil Rights$525Other$0
02FY2025 · 14 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$1,500
Median grant
6
States reached
$365k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Individual grant recipient$7,300
JEWISH FED OF PBG$5,000
TEMPLE KOL AMI$3,151
PITTSBURGH COMMUNITY BROADCASTING CENTER$3,000
Individual grant recipient$3,000
UNITED WAY OF PITTSBURGH$2,000
UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA FOUNDATION$1,500
TEMPLE EMANUEL$1,000
FILM PITTSBURGH$250
US HOLOCAUST MEMORIAL MUSEUM$200
JEWISH PHILANTHROPIES OF SOUTHERN ARIZONA$180
CENTRAL EAST NCSY$100
PJ LIBRARY$54
ST FRANCIS HOSPITAL FOUNDATION$36
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–18, $364) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%JEWISH ASSOCIATION ON AGING: $300 → 11%JEWISH ASSOCIATION ON AGING: $64 → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MI
NY
MA
OH
PA
CT
CA
AZ
DC
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

93%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$212k · 21 repeat orgs$17k to everyone else

21 repeat relationships: 9 still active in FY2025, 12 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

21
19

Total granted

$212k
$13k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+25%
+51%

Still filing today

33%
21%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 87% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $3k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Arts & CultureHuman ServicesHealthCrime & LegalEnvironmentEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • University of Arizona Foundation
    3× · 2023–2025 · $10k · revenue +12%
  • FP
    FILM PITTSBURGH
    8× · 2017–2025 · $3k · revenue +45%
  • TU
    The United States Holocaust Memorial Museum
    9× · 2017–2025 · $1k · revenue +25%

Funded once

  • JF
    JEWISH FEDERATION OF SPBC
    one grant, 2017 · $5k
  • YJ
    YOUNGSTOWN JEWISH FEDERATION APPEAL
    one grant, 2019 · $2k
  • UW
    UNITED WAY OF SW PA
    one grant, 2017 · $2k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Point Park University

Provides innovative education in a dynamic urban setting. dedicated to academic excellence and community engagement,we prepare students of diverse backgrounds with the knowledge, skill,and experience to lead meaningful lives as informed…

—
2
University of Pittsburgh

The university of pittsburgh, founded in 1787, is one of the oldest institutions of higher education in the united states and one of the nation's top public research universities. for more than two centuries, the university of pittsburgh…

Education
3
Zoological Society of Pittsburgh

The zoological society of pittsburgh is dedicated to being a leader in, and significant contributor to, the conservation of endangered and threatened species. the society provides an enjoyable family experience that fosters understanding,…

Animals
4
Wilson College

Wilson college empowers students to be confident and critical thinkers, creative visionaries, effective communicators, honorable leaders, and agents of justice.

Education
5
Pittsburgh Ballet Theatre Inc

See schedule o for the description of pittsburgh ballet theatre inc.'s primary mission.the ballet is pittsburgh's source and ambassador for extraordinary ballet experiences that give life to the classical tradition, nurture new ideas and,…

Arts & Culture
6
Pittsburgh Public Theater Corporation

The mission of pittsburgh public theater is to provide artistically diverse theatrical experiences of the highest quality. pittsburgh public theater also strives to serve, challenge, stimulate, and (continued on schedule o)

Arts & Culture
7
The Jewish Museum

The mission of the jewish museum is to collect, preserve, exhibit and interpret art and jewish culture. see schedule o for more information.

Arts & Culture
8
The Trustees of Princeton University

Research, education and general - princeton university is a private not-for-profit, non-sectarian institution of higher learning with approximately 5,700 undergraduate and 3,300 graduate students. 2,500 students graduated in the 2024-2025…

Education
9
The Jewish Women's Archive Inc

The jewish women's archive documents jewish women's stories, elevates their voices, and inspires them to be agents of change.jwa is dedicated to expanding and transforming the historical narrative by restoring jewish women and gender…

Arts & Culture
10
Public Media Nj Inc

To bring quality public television programs and resources to communities throughout new jersey and its tri-state neighbors. its content, both on-air and online, aims to reflect the diverse

Arts & Culture
11
Greater Philadelphia Tourism Marketing Corporation

Visit philadelphia is our name and our mission. as the region's official tourism marketing agency, we build greater philadelphia's image, drive visitation and boost the economy.

Community Improvement
12
Pittsburgh Entertainment Project

To create a vibrant, responsible, and sustainable film and digital media sector in southwestern pennsylvania.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Pittsburgh Cultural Trust; the most unlike its peers is The United States Holocaust Memorial Museum. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 47 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
13/13
Grantees still filing
9/13
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

UNITED JEWISH FED OF PBG: $38,360 · OtherUNITED JEWISH FED OF PBGCONGREGATION KOL AMI: $32,696 · OtherCONGREGATION KOL AMIIndividual grant recipient: $25,880 · OtherIndividual grant recipientUNITED WAY OF PITTSBURGH: $17,000 · OtherUNITED WAY OF PITTSBURGHCONGREGATION OR CHADASH TUCSON: $16,999 · OtherCONGREGATION OR CHADASH TUCSONUNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA: $13,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF ARIZONAPITTSBURGH COMMUNITY BROADCASTING CENTER: $12,000 · OtherPITTSBURGH COMMUNITY BROADCASTING CENTERJEWISH FED OF PBG: $10,000 · OtherTEMPLE EMANUEL: $7,000 · OtherJEWISH FEDERATION OF SOUTHERN AZ: $7,000 · Other+24 more: $26,117 · Other+24 morePITTSBURGH CULTURAL TRUST: $7,000 · Arts & CultureFILM PITTSBURGH: $2,660 · Arts & CultureThe United States Holocaust Memorial Museum: $1,048 · Arts & Culture+3 more: $343 · Arts & CultureUniversity of Arizona Foundation: $9,500 · EducationJEWISH FEDERATION OF SOUTH PALM BEACH COUNTY INC: $5,000 · PhilanthropyTHE UNITED WAY OF SOUTHWESTERN PENNSYLVANIA: $2,000 · PhilanthropyPLANNED PARENTHOOD OF WESTERN PA INC: $1,000 · HealthJEWISH ASSOCIATION ON AGING: $364 · Human ServicesBig Brothers Big Sisters of Greater Pittsburgh Inc: $360 · Crime & LegalWESTERN PENNSYLVANIA CONSERVANCY: $40 · Environment
Other$206,052Arts & Culture$11,051Education$9,500Philanthropy$7,000Health$1,000Human Services$364Crime & Legal$360Environment$40

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetUniversity of Arizona Foundation: $9,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetPITTSBURGH CULTURAL TRUST: $7,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetJEWISH FEDERATION OF SOUTH PALM BEACH COUNTY INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFILM PITTSBURGH: $2,660 over 8y, 0.2% of budgetTHE UNITED WAY OF SOUTHWESTERN PENNSYLVANIA: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetThe United States Holocaust Memorial Museum: $1,048 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetPLANNED PARENTHOOD OF WESTERN PA INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJEWISH ASSOCIATION ON AGING: $364 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBig Brothers Big Sisters of Greater Pittsburgh Inc: $360 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetPITTSBURGH SYMPHONY INC: $300 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetWESTERN PENNSYLVANIA CONSERVANCY: $40 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSIMON WIESENTHAL CENTER INC: $25 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN SOCIETY FOR YAD VASHEM INC: $18 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds University of Arizona Foundation ↗
  • Who funds PITTSBURGH CULTURAL TRUST ↗
  • Who funds JEWISH FEDERATION OF SOUTH PALM BEACH COUNTY INC ↗
  • Who funds FILM PITTSBURGH ↗
  • Who funds THE UNITED WAY OF SOUTHWESTERN PENNSYLVANIA ↗
  • Who funds The United States Holocaust Memorial Museum ↗
  • Who funds PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF WESTERN PA INC ↗
  • Who funds JEWISH ASSOCIATION ON AGING ↗
  • Who funds Big Brothers Big Sisters of Greater Pittsburgh Inc ↗
  • Who funds PITTSBURGH SYMPHONY INC ↗
  • Who funds WESTERN PENNSYLVANIA CONSERVANCY ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a set of overlaps that mostly run through this funder rather than between each other.

Amazonsmile FoundationWA3.3× affinity4 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Margie L Brown Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Margie L Brown Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Margie L Brown Family Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Margie L Brown Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 47 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Margie L Brown Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph