Skip to content

· Private foundation

Margaret and Peter Chang Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$137k
Granted FY2025still arriving
8
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$30k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Health$450kHuman Services$245kEducation$179kCrime & Legal$20k
02FY2025 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k2 grants · $13k
  • $10k–50k6 grants · $124k
$20,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$2.4M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Children's Specialized Hospital$30,000
Individual grant recipient$24,750
Overlook Hospital Foundation$22,500
Child Focus$20,000
Imagine$17,000
YWCA Eastern Union County$10,000
Resolve Community Counseling$7,500
Imagine$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–25, $55k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 7%The Max Cure Foundation: $10k → 7%Child Focus: $20k → 12%Child Focus: $25k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

87%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$773k · 13 repeat orgs$120k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +30% since the first grant, against +25% for those funded once.

13 repeat relationships: 6 still active in FY2025, 7 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

13
8

Total granted

$773k
$96k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+30%
+25%

Still filing today

54%
38%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 82% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $25k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthHuman ServicesEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CA
    Court Appointed Special Advocates of Union County Inc
    4× · 2019–2022 · $68k · revenue +30%
  • YO
    YWCA OF EASTERN UNION COUNTY INC
    7× · 2017–2025 · $65k · revenue +17%
  • FF
    Foundation for Morristown Medical Center
    2× · 2018–2019 · $60k · revenue +83%

Funded once

  • I
    Imgine
    one grant, 2024 · $23k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2017 · $20k
  • SP
    Scotch Plains Fanwood School Distriict
    one grant, 2018 · $13k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Children's Hospital Corporation

Provider of pediatric healthcare, education, research & community service

Health
2
Court Appointed Special Advocates of New Jersey Inc

Promoting, assisting and supporting the sustainability and growth of casa programs in new jersey. casa programs promote the protection of abused and neglected children by using trained volunteers to advocate for these children in courts…

Crime & Legal
3
Johns Hopkins All Children's Hospital Inc

Mission: johns hopkins all children's hospital (all children's), a member of johns hopkins medicine, strives to provide the highest quality care to improve the health of our entire community through innovation, collaboration, service…

Health
4
Pediatric Physician Services Inc

The corporation is organized for charitable, educational and scientific purposes, and to provide healthcare services of pediatric specialty physicians and other personnel to the patients of johns hopkins all children's hospital and…

—
5
United Children's Services of Bennington County Inc

Children's services

Human Services
6
The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia

The children's hospital of philadelphia, the oldest hospital in the united states dedicated exclusively to pediatrics, strives to be the world leader in the advancement of health care for children by integrating excellent patient care,…

Health
7
Children's Specialty Care Coalition

To ensure that children with complex health care needs have access to timely and high quality medical care, and that pediatric specialists are able to thrive in californias health care

Community Improvement
8
Comprehensive Behavioral Healthcare Inc

The organization's mission is to promote mental health, wellness, and hope for recovery for all individuals and families through compassionate care, expert treatment, advocacy, education, prevention, and early intervention.

—
9
Advocates for Children of New Jersey

To identify children's needs through research, policy and legal analysis, to raise awareness of those needs through strategic communications, and to work with elected officials and other decision-makers to enact effective responses.

Human Services
10
Kids Home Care Inc

The corporation is organized for charitable, educational, and scientific purposes, and to provide pediatric home health care, alternate site and other pediatric services to pediatric patients. in addition, kids home care conducts health…

Health
11
Physicians Organization at Children's Hospital Inc

The Organization operates exclusively for the benefit of the charitable purposes of Boston Children's Hospital (the Hospital) and the affiliated Foundations. It works jointly with the Hospital and the Foundations in developing and…

Health
12
St Marys Healthcare System for Children Inc

To serve as the sole member of the various health care and supporting organizations that comprise st. mary's healthcare system for children

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Pg Chambers School; the most unlike its peers is The Arc of Union County Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 22 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/12
Grantees still filing
11/12
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Overlook Hospital Foundation: $80,000 · OtherOverlook Hospital FoundationCourt Appointed Special Advocates of Union County Inc: $67,500 · OtherCourt Appointed Special Advocates of Union County IncYWCA OF EASTERN UNION COUNTY INC: $65,000 · OtherYWCA OF EASTERN UNION COUNTY INCSUMMIT SPEECH SCHOOL: $52,500 · OtherSUMMIT SPEECH SCHOOLMiddlesex Community College: $48,000 · OtherMiddlesex Community CollegeImagine: $39,500 · OtherImagineScotch Plains-Fanwood School District: $26,156 · OtherScotch Plains-Fanwood School DistrictIndividual grant recipient: $24,750 · OtherImgine: $22,750 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $20,000 · Other+5 more: $42,890 · Other+5 moreCHILDREN'S SPECIALIZED HOSPITAL: $145,000 · HealthCHILDREN'S SPECIALIZED HOSPITALFoundation for Morristown Medical Center: $60,000 · HealthFoundation for Morristown Medical Cen…RESOLVE COMMUNITY COUNSELING CENTER INC: $57,500 · HealthRESOLVE COMMUNITY COUNSELING CENTER I…CHILDREN'S SPECIALIZED HOSPITAL FOUNDATION INC: $35,000 · HealthCHILDREN'S SPECIALIZED HOSPITAL FOUND…CHILD FOCUS INC: $45,000 · Human ServicesTHE MAX CURE FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 · Human ServicesMIDDLESEX COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC: $51,800 · Education
Other$489,046Health$297,500Human Services$55,000Education$51,800

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCHILDREN'S SPECIALIZED HOSPITAL: $145,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetCourt Appointed Special Advocates of Union County Inc: $67,500 over 4y, 2.8% of budgetYWCA OF EASTERN UNION COUNTY INC: $65,000 over 7y, 0.3% of budgetFoundation for Morristown Medical Center: $60,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetRESOLVE COMMUNITY COUNSELING CENTER INC: $57,500 over 8y, 1.1% of budgetSUMMIT SPEECH SCHOOL: $52,500 over 7y, 0.3% of budgetMIDDLESEX COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC: $51,800 over 3y, 1.7% of budgetCHILD FOCUS INC: $45,000 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetCHILDREN'S SPECIALIZED HOSPITAL FOUNDATION INC: $35,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetTHE MAX CURE FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 over 1y, 2.1% of budgetPG CHAMBERS SCHOOL: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetThe Arc of Union County Inc: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds CHILDREN'S SPECIALIZED HOSPITAL ↗
  • Who funds Court Appointed Special Advocates of Union County Inc ↗
  • Who funds YWCA OF EASTERN UNION COUNTY INC ↗
  • Who funds Foundation for Morristown Medical Center ↗
  • Who funds RESOLVE COMMUNITY COUNSELING CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds SUMMIT SPEECH SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds MIDDLESEX COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds CHILD FOCUS INC ↗
  • Who funds CHILDREN'S SPECIALIZED HOSPITAL FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds THE MAX CURE FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds PG CHAMBERS SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds The Arc of Union County Inc ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Ej Grassmann TrustNJ19.9× affinity7 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Ej Grassmann Trust · The Summit Foundation · The Hyde and Watson Foundation · Community Foundation of New Jersey · Union Foundation · Lillian P Schenck Tw Lps Fund · Investors Foundation Inc · The Westfield Foundation · Turrell Fund · The Provident Bank Foundation · Citizens Philanthropic Foundation Inc · Oceanfirst Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Margaret and Peter Chang Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Margaret and Peter Chang Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 40%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →median 29%
  • Child Focus Inc: 29% of income from government
  • Ywca of Eastern Union County Inc: 8% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
4get no government money at all
3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Margaret and Peter Chang Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Margaret and Peter Chang Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 22 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Margaret and Peter Chang’s filings →

More from the funding graph