Skip to content

· Private foundation

Marcum Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$84k
Granted FY2025still arriving
20
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$30k
Largest
01What it funds
0189% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Education$163kRecreation & Sports$50kHuman Services$27kArts & Culture$16kHealth$6kReligion$5kAnimals$5kPublic Safety & Disaster$563Other$0
02FY2025 · 20 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k17 grants · $17k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $68k
$600
Median grant
3
States reached
$1.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
VIRGINIA TECH FOUNDATION$30,000
VT ATHLETIC FUND$25,000
RADFORD UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION$12,550
Individual grant recipient$5,850
EAGLES NEST REGENERATION$4,000
VT FELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIAN ATHLETES$1,200
DUKE CANCER INSTITUTE$1,000
MOUNTAIN EMPIRE CC FOUNDATION$1,000
RADFORD UNIVERSITY FELLOWSHIP OF CH$900
WVU FOUNDATION$600
Individual grant recipient$500
MONTGOMERY COUNTY CHRISTMAS STORE$500
BLACKSBURG SPORTS CLUB$275
RIVERVIEW CEMETERY FUND$250
P BUCKLEY MOSS SOCIETY$225
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–25, $27k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 98% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%YMCA OF THE TRIANGLE: $500 → 8%EAGLES NEST REGENERATION: $6k → 12%EAGLES NEST REGENERATION: $6k → 12%EAGLES NEST REGENERATION: $4k → 12%Eagles Nest Regeneration: $4k → 12%EAGLES NEST REGENERATION: $3k → 12%Eagles Nest Regeneration: $3k → 12%MONTGOMERY COUNTY CHRISTMAS STORE: $500 → 21%MONTGOMERY COUNTY CHRISTMAS STORE: $100 → 21%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IA
CA
WV
VA
TN
NC
SC
GA
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

97%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$192k · 22 repeat orgs$6k to everyone else

22 repeat relationships: 14 still active in FY2025, 8 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

22
20

Total granted

$192k
$4k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+38%
+88%

Still filing today

45%
15%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 97% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $2k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationHuman ServicesHealthArts & CultureAnimalsRecreation & SportsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • EN
    EAGLES NEST REGENERATION
    6× · 2020–2025 · $26k · revenue +240%
  • BM
    Blacksburg Museum And Cultural Foundation Inc
    3× · 2020–2022 · $15k · revenue +38%
  • MC
    MONROE COUNTY FRIENDS OF ANIMALS
    5× · 2020–2024 · $4k · revenue +288%

Funded once

  • UW
    UVA Wise Foundation
    one grant, 2021 · $1k
  • TY
    The Young Men's Christian Association of the Triangle Area Inc (4598)graduated
    one grant, 2020 · $500 · revenue +88%
  • LL
    LAASERS LADYBUG SOCIETY
    one grant, 2022 · $500
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Virginia Commonwealth University Foundat

To support the educational, scientific and charitable activities of virginia commonwealth university and related organizations.

Education
2
Medical College of Va Foundation

To support and foster vcu health and vcu health sciences through philanthropy, stewardship, innovation, communication, and collaboration.

Education
3
Vcu Investment Management Company

To provide investment and investment management and related services to the rector and the board of visitors of virginia commonwealth university (vcu), and/or to the private and independent foundations and other entities affiliated with…

Education
4
William & Mary Foundation

The William & Mary Foundation advances the university's highest aspirations by securing private support, guiding a multi-asset investment portfolio, and offering strategic leadership. In this work, we propel the university toward national…

Education
5
Virginia Commonwealth University Intellectual Property Foundation

The foundation determines the patentability and obtains patents on virginia commonwealth university (vcu) inventions and markets and licenses such inventions to commerical entities. the foundation's activities promote research efforts at…

Health
6
Virginia Tech Applied Research Corporation

The mission of vt-arc is to extend the impact of the virginia tech research and innovation enterprise, delivering superior analytic and technology solutions to government and non-government customers.

Science & Tech
7
Virginia Commonwealth University School of Business Foundation

The mission of the foundation is to assist, support and foster the activities and mission of the school of business at virginia commonwealth university. it solicits, manages and distributes assets to benefit programs in the school of…

Education
8
Virginia Student Aid Foundation Inc

The virginia athletics foundation, through its fund-raising efforts, strives to support a preeminent intercollegiate athletics program at the university of virginia by providing student-athletes theopportunity to achieve academic and…

Education
9
University of Virginia Investment Management Company

The university of virginia investment management company (uvimco) is organized to invest funds on behalf of the rector and visitors of the university of virginia (the university or uva) and university-associated organizations (uaos).

Education
10
Vicksburg Foundation
—
11
University of Virginia Engineering Foundation Inc

The foundation supports the mission of the university of virginia school of engineering and applied science by leading efforts to build and sustain beneficial relationships and by raising, investing, managing and providing external private…

—
12
The University of Virginia Medical School Foundation

The university of virginia medical alumni association and medical school foundation is dedicated to enhancing the experience of students, housestaff, alumni and faculty of the uva school of medicine by creating opportunities for mentoring,…

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is West Virginia University Foundation Inc; the most unlike its peers is Gbm Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

16 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 16 of the 49 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
15/16
Grantees still filing
12/16
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

VIRGINIA TECH FOUNDATION INC: $85,950 · EducationVIRGINIA TECH FOUNDATION INCRADFORD UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC: $71,750 · EducationRADFORD UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC+2 more: $3,750 · EducationVT ATHLETIC FUND: $38,000 · OtherVT ATHLETIC FUNDIndividual grant recipient: $7,950 · OtherIndividual grant recipientDuke Cancer Institute: $5,000 · OtherDuke Cancer InstituteVT FELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIAN ATHLETES: $4,800 · OtherVT FELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIAN AT…RADFORD UNIVERSITY FELLOWSHIP OF CH: $4,222 · OtherRADFORD UNIVERSITY FELLOWSHIP…+32 more: $13,168 · Other+32 moreEAGLES NEST REGENERATION: $25,500 · Human ServicesEAGLES NES…+2 more: $1,200 · Human ServicesBlacksburg Museum And Cultural Foundation Inc: $15,000 · Arts & CultureMONROE COUNTY FRIENDS OF ANIMALS: $4,350 · AnimalsBLACKSBURG SPORTS CLUB: $2,925 · Recreation & SportsPROSTATE CANCER FOUNDATION: $600 · PhilanthropyCommunity Foundation of the Lowcountry: $200 · Philanthropy
Education$161,450Other$73,140Human Services$26,700Arts & Culture$15,000Animals$4,350Recreation & Sports$2,925Philanthropy$800

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetVIRGINIA TECH FOUNDATION INC: $85,950 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetRADFORD UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC: $71,750 over 6y, 0.7% of budgetEAGLES NEST REGENERATION: $25,500 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetBlacksburg Museum And Cultural Foundation Inc: $15,000 over 3y, 2.4% of budgetMONROE COUNTY FRIENDS OF ANIMALS: $4,350 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetWEST VIRGINIA UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC: $3,500 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetBLACKSBURG SPORTS CLUB: $2,925 over 6y, 1.4% of budgetMONTGOMERY COUNTY CHRISTMAS STORE: $700 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetPROSTATE CANCER FOUNDATION: $600 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetBLACKSBURG VOLUNTEER RESCUE SQUAD: $563 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetThe Young Men's Christian Association of the Triangle Area Inc (4598): $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLAASERS LADYBUG SOCIETY: $500 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetHEARTS HELPING EACH ADOLESCENT REACH THEIR SPARK: $300 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetP BUCKLEY MOSS FOUNDATION: $250 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetCommunity Foundation of the Lowcountry: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds VIRGINIA TECH FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds RADFORD UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds EAGLES NEST REGENERATION ↗
  • Who funds Blacksburg Museum And Cultural Foundation Inc ↗
  • Who funds MONROE COUNTY FRIENDS OF ANIMALS ↗
  • Who funds WEST VIRGINIA UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds BLACKSBURG SPORTS CLUB ↗
  • Who funds MONTGOMERY COUNTY CHRISTMAS STORE ↗
  • Who funds PROSTATE CANCER FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds BLACKSBURG VOLUNTEER RESCUE SQUAD ↗
  • Who funds The Young Men's Christian Association of the Triangle Area Inc (4598) ↗
  • Who funds LAASERS LADYBUG SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds HEARTS HELPING EACH ADOLESCENT REACH THEIR SPARK ↗
  • Who funds P BUCKLEY MOSS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Community Foundation of the Lowcountry ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift FundMA3.3× affinity6 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Marcum Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Marcum Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 49 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Marcum’s filings →

    More from the funding graph