Skip to content

· Private foundation

Marchbanks Foundation Inc

TO AID AND SUPPORT POOR NEEDY FAMILIES, SENIORS, CHILDREN,AND HOMELESS INDIVIDUALS.

$50k
Granted FY2025still arriving
25
Grants FY2025still arriving
10
States reached
$5k
Largest
01What it funds
0185% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2021 to 2025.

Religion$89kEnvironment$62kPhilanthropy$18kEducation$17kCommunity Improvement$12kHuman Services$7kHousing & Shelter$7kFood & Nutrition$5kOther$0
02FY2025 · 25 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$1,848
Median grant
10
States reached
$960k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
TULARE BASIN WETLANDS ASSOCIATION$4,597
ST JOHN'S LUTHERAN CHURCH$4,000
ST PHILLIPS CHURCH$4,000
SALVATION ARMY$3,625
MORNING STAR FRESH FOOD MINISTRY$3,500
CLIFFORD BRADFORD FOUNDATION$3,013
Individual grant recipient$2,850
Individual grant recipient$2,500
Individual grant recipient$2,000
ST JUDE HOSPITAL$2,000
Individual grant recipient$2,000
MISSION OF KERN$2,000
CASA ESPERANZA$1,848
FOOD FOR THE POOR$1,500
DUCKS UNLIMITED$1,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY21–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 18%, against an area that typically sits at 15%. 97% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 15%FATHER FLANAGAN: $500 → 12%ST JUDE HOSPITAL: $2k → 11%AUDUBON SOCIETY: $1k → 10%MORNING STAR FRESH FOOD MINISTRY: $4k → 18%SALVATION ARMY: $4k → 19%FARLEY BOYS HOME: $1k → 20%FOOD FOR THE POOR: $2k → 13%DUCKS UNLIMITED: $2k → 17%SISTER OF ST BENEDICT: $1k → 8%SOCIETY OF LITTLE FLOWER: $2k → 7%CATHOLIC RELIEF SERVICE: $500 → 19%ST JOHN'S LUTHERAN CHURCH: $22k → 18%LEUKEMIA AND LYMPHOMA SOCIETY: $1k → 19%ST JOHN'S LUTHERAN CHURCH: $18k → 18%TULARE BASIN WETLANDS ASSOCIATION: $51k → 18%ST JOHN'S LUTHERAN CHURCH: $14k → 18%TULARE BASIN WETLANDS ASSOCIATION: $5k → 18%ST JOHN'S LUTHERAN CHURCH: $11k → 18%TULARE BASIN WETLANDS ASSOCIATION: $5k → 18%ST JOHN'S LUTHERAN CHURCH: $4k → 18%ST PHILLIPS CHURCH: $7k → 18%ST PHILLIPS CHURCH: $7k → 18%ST PHILLIPS CHURCH: $4k → 18%JJ LEGACY: $3k → 18%WEST ROTARY: $3k → 18%CASA ESPERANZA: $2k → 18%KIRSCHENMANN FAMILY FOUNDATION: $1k → 18%GARCES MEMORIAL HIGH SCHOOL: $17k → 18%LOS ALAMOS WETLANDS: $2k → 18%CLIFFORD BRADFORD FOUNDATION: $8k → 18%BAKERSFIELD CHRISTIAN: $15k → 18%CLIFFORD BRADFORD FOUNDATION: $6k → 18%BAKERSFIELD CHRISTIAN: $2k → 18%CLIFFORD BRADFORD FOUNDATION: $3k → 18%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MN
IL
IN
CA
NE
VA
MD
TN
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 52% of Marchbanks Foundation Inc’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address. By recipient address, 96% of the giving stays in CA; by stated purpose, 44%.

Marchbanks Foundation Inclessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

79%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$195k · 6 repeat orgs$53k to everyone else

6 repeat relationships: 6 still active in FY2025, 0 since wound down; 19 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

6
2

Total granted

$195k
$23k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

-14%
+268%

Still filing today

17%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 39% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $31k went to new ones.

50%100%’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’21’22’23’24’25
EnvironmentEducationFood & NutritionInternationalHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SJ
    ST JOHN LUTHERAN CHURCH
    5× · 2021–2025 · $69k
  • TB
    Tulare Basin Wetlands Association
    3× · 2023–2025 · $60k · revenue -14% · 67% of their budget
  • SP
    ST PHILLIPS CHURCH
    3× · 2023–2025 · $18k

Funded once

  • BC
    BAKERSFIELD CATHOLIC EDUCATION FOUNDATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $17k · revenue +268%
  • CE
    CASA ESPERANZAHEARTS FOR HOPE
    one grant, 2021 · $6k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field
05the grantee network

6 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 6 of the 27 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
6/6
Grantees still filing
2/6
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

ST JOHN LUTHERAN CHURCH: $68,612 · OtherST JOHN LUTHERAN CHURCHST PHILLIPS CHURCH: $18,000 · OtherST PHILLIPS CHURCHCLIFFORD BRADFORD FOUNDATION: $17,498 · OtherCLIFFORD BRADFORD FOUNDATIONIndividual grant recipient: $17,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientMISSION OF KERN: $13,900 · OtherMISSION OF KERNCASA ESPERANZAHEARTS FOR HOPE: $6,000 · Other+15 more: $23,123 · Other+15 moreTulare Basin Wetlands Association: $60,308 · EnvironmentTulare Basin Wetlands Associ…+1 more: $1,500 · EnvironmentBAKERSFIELD CATHOLIC EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $16,600 · EducationMorning Star Fresh Food Ministry Inc: $3,500 · Food & NutritionFOOD FOR THE POOR INC: $1,500 · InternationalBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC: $1,000 · Health
Other$164,133Environment$61,808Education$16,600Food & Nutrition$3,500International$1,500Health$1,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTulare Basin Wetlands Association: $60,308 over 3y, 67% of budgetBAKERSFIELD CATHOLIC EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $16,600 over 1y, 2.0% of budgetDucks Unlimited Inc: $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Tulare Basin Wetlands Association ↗
  • Who funds BAKERSFIELD CATHOLIC EDUCATION FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Morning Star Fresh Food Ministry Inc ↗
  • Who funds Ducks Unlimited Inc ↗
  • Who funds FOOD FOR THE POOR INC ↗
  • Who funds BLOOD CANCER UNITED INC ↗

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Marchbanks Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Marchbanks Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%5%19%42%75%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Food for the Poor Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Marchbanks Foundation Inc?

Find your warmest path to Marchbanks Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 27 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Marchbanks’ filings →

More from the funding graph