Skip to content
Marbeh Shalom Foundation Inc at a glance

· Private foundation

Marbeh Shalom Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$584k
Granted FY2025still arriving
131
Grants FY2025still arriving
8
States reached
$118k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
0172% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Religion$3.3MPhilanthropy$89kEducation$56kHuman Services$44kHealth$33kInternational$31kAnimals$16kFood & Nutrition$10kOther$0
02FY2025 · 131 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k119 grants · $158k
  • $10k–50k10 grants · $199k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $227k
$1,000
Median grant
8
States reached
$322k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
BET MEDRASH GADOL ATERET TORAH$117,500
ATERET TORAH YESHIVA CENTER$109,469
YAD YOSEF FOUNDATION$42,000
AEERA SHACHAR INC$40,200
AHAVAT SHALOM CONGREGATION$23,117
DARCHEI DAVID FOUNDATION$22,000
JEWISH COMMUNAL FUND$15,000
MESIVTA YESHIVA RABBI CHAIM BERLIN$13,000
Individual grant recipient$12,000
YESHIVA GEDOLAH BE'ER HATORAH$12,000
TIFERET MOSHE INC$10,000
YESHIVA MEOR HATORAH INC$10,000
CHASDEI LEV$7,200
MIR YESHIVA$6,200
AMERICAN FRIENDS OF ZICHRON ELIYAHU$5,800
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $61k) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 98% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%OSEH CHESSED: $200 → 14%CHAIM MEDICAL RESOURCE: $10k → 14%CHAIM MEDICAL RESOURCE: $5k → 14%CHAIM MEDICAL RESOURCE: $3k → 14%CHAIM MEDICAL RESOURCE: $500 → 14%ISRAEL SELECT CHARITY FUND INC: $1k → 14%KEREN SIMCHAS CHOSSON V'KALLAH: $1k → 20%EMAHOT FOUNDATION INC: $2k → 17%AHAVAT HAIM VACHESED: $400 → 6%AHAVAT HAIM VACHESED: $400 → 6%AHAVAT HAIM VACHESED: $250 → 6%EMAHOT FOUNDATION INC: $660 → 17%EMAHOT FOUNDATION INC: $200 → 17%EMAHOT FOUNDATION INC: $200 → 17%AHAVAS TZEDOKOS CORP: $1k → 11%MITZVAH MAN FOUNDATION CORP: $200 → 20%AHAVAS TZEDOKOS CORP: $600 → 11%AHAVAS TZEDOKOS CORP: $350 → 11%AHAVAS TZEDOKOS CORP: $300 → 11%AHAVAS TZEDOKOS CORP: $300 → 11%SEPHARDIC BIKUR HOLIM: $11k → 20%KEREN HATZEDAKA: $200 → 11%SEPHARDIC BIKUR HOLIM: $2k → 20%SEPHARDIC BIKUR HOLIM: $1k → 20%SEPHARDIC BIKUR HOLIM: $1k → 20%SEPHARDIC BIKUR HOLIM: $1k → 20%SEPHARDIC BIKUR HOLIM: $1k → 20%SEPHARDIC BIKUR HOLIM: $500 → 20%AMERICAN FRIENDS OF TORAT MOSHE: $400 → 20%AMERICAN FRIENDS OF TORAT MOSHE: $175 → 20%A TIME: $554 → 20%A TIME: $525 → 20%A TIME: $500 → 20%A TIME: $500 → 20%A TIME: $500 → 20%A TIME: $500 → 20%A TIME: $360 → 20%FRIENDS OF KETER TORAH INC: $2k → 20%AHAVAT YISROEL HUMANITY INC: $2k → 20%MISASKIM: $1k → 20%MISASKIM: $500 → 20%MITZVAH MAN FOUNDATION: $200 → 20%CHAYIM ARUCHIM: $500 → 20%CHAYIM ARUCHIM: $200 → 20%COMMUNITY ASSISTANCE FUND: $2k → 20%COMMUNITY ASSISTANCE FUND: $2k → 20%WE LOVE TO HELP INC: $300 → 20%AMERICAN FRIENDS OF TORAT MOSHE: $200 → 20%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MN
IL
WI
MI
NY
MA
OH
PA
NJ
CT
RI
CA
CO
NE
MO
MD
DC
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

94%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$4.1M · 436 repeat orgs$278k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +17% since the first grant, against +7% for those funded once.

436 repeat relationships: 124 still active in FY2025, 312 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

436
359

Total granted

$4.1M
$275k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+17%
+7%

Still filing today

25%
22%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 99% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $3k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
ReligionPhilanthropyEducationHuman ServicesInternationalHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • DD
    DARCHEI DAVID FOUNDATION
    8× · 2017–2025 · $81k · revenue +83%
  • MB
    MOSDOT BETH YAAKOV
    8× · 2017–2025 · $55k · revenue +47%
  • KH
    KEREN HAYESHIVOT TRUST
    5× · 2020–2025 · $30k · revenue +144%

Funded once

  • CR
    CONGREGATION RODFEI ZEDEK
    one grant, 2023 · $20k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2019 · $16k
  • YC
    YESHIVA CHAIM BERLIN
    one grant, 2023 · $10k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Yeshiva Ohr Yisroel
Philanthropy
2
American Friends of Amshinover Yeshiva Jerusalem Inc

Support of religious schools in Israel

International
3
American Friends of Yeshiva Aish Hatorah
—
4
Tomchei Torah Inc

Religious Teaching

—
5
American Friends of Yeshivat Nachalat Yossef

The organization will provide financial assistance to educational institutions that promote the observance of the jewish religion, its laws and traditions, and sacred texts, including yeshivat nachalat yossef, located in jerusalem, israel.

Religion
6
Zichron Avrohom Yosef
Philanthropy
7
Keren Yaakov Ben Menachen Tzvi Foundation
Philanthropy
8
American Friends of Hamesorah Talmud Torah Inc

Charity and education in u.s. and israel

—
9
Yeshiva Beit Rafael

Religious & charitable- to provide funds to enable the study of torah.

Philanthropy
10
American Friends of Amaleh Shel Torah Inc

None

Education
11
American Friends of Shviti Hashem Inc

To support and promote the study of torah (bible) among members of jewish faith worldwide.

Religion
12
Friends of Yeshiva Tehilas Shlomo Inc

Provide support to further jewish education

Philanthropy
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Ahavat Yisroel Humanity Inc; the most unlike its peers is American Friends of Binyan-Av Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

210 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 210 of the 804 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
54
Early backer (in before they grew)
194/210
Grantees still filing
135/210
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

ATERET TORAH YESHIVA CENTER: $663,870 · OtherATERET TORAH YESHIVA CENTERBET MEDRASH GADOL ATERET TORAH: $439,128 · OtherBET MEDRASH GADOL ATERET TORAHATERET TORAH CENTER: $376,121 · OtherATERET TORAH CENTERYAD YOSEF FOUNDATION: $310,192 · OtherYAD YOSEF FOUNDATION+149 more: $1,847,802 · Other+149 moreJEWISH COMMUNAL FUND: $55,500 · PhilanthropyKEREN HAYESHIVOT TRUST: $30,000 · PhilanthropyGEMAH BET YISRAEL INC: $16,500 · PhilanthropyDONORS FUND INC: $14,500 · PhilanthropyTIFERET RABBI AKIVA: $9,050 · PhilanthropyAMUDEI CHESED INC: $5,411 · Philanthropy+5 more: $17,800 · PhilanthropyYESHIVAT YAGDIL TORAH INC: $25,700 · EducationYESHIVAT SHAARE TORAH INC: $19,640 · EducationTIFFERET MOSHE INC: $17,000 · EducationYESHIVAT OR HACHAIM OF LAKEWOOD INC: $14,200 · EducationMESIVTA OF CLIFTON INC: $10,300 · EducationILAN HIGH SCHOOL: $9,080 · EducationAmerican Friends of Ramot Torah Schools: $8,450 · EducationHEICHAL HATORAH: $6,700 · EducationCHEDVAS BAIS YAAKOV INC: $5,200 · Education+1 more: $3,000 · EducationMOSDOT BETH YAAKOV: $54,900 · ReligionYeshivat Lev Torah: $11,721 · ReligionCHOFETZ CHAIM HERITAGE FOUNDATION: $6,752 · ReligionNETIV HALACHA INC: $6,300 · ReligionYESHIVAT OHEL TORAH: $6,101 · ReligionTZUR FOUNDATION INC: $5,800 · ReligionMAIMONIDES WAY INC: $4,860 · ReligionYABIA OMER: $4,000 · Religion+6 more: $17,207 · ReligionCHAIM MEDICAL RESOURCE INC: $18,100 · Human ServicesSBH COMMUNITY SERVICE NETWORK INC: $17,380 · Human ServicesCOMMUNITY ASSISTANCE FUND INC: $3,800 · Human ServicesA Torah Infertilty Medium Exchange: $3,539 · Human ServicesEMAHOT FOUNDATION INC: $3,160 · Human ServicesAHAVAS TZEDOKOS CORP: $2,750 · Human ServicesAMERICAN FRIENDS OF YESHIVA DMIR INC: $8,400 · InternationalAMERICAN FRIENDS OF AGUDAT SHETILE ZETIM INC: $4,400 · InternationalAMERICAN FRIENDS OF YESHIVAT TIFRACH: $3,080 · InternationalCentral Fund of Israel: $2,381 · InternationalAMERICAN FRIENDS OF YORU MISHPATECHA INC: $2,350 · InternationalBET YISRAEL: $8,700 · Animals
Other$3,637,113Philanthropy$148,761Education$119,270Religion$117,641Human Services$48,729International$20,611Animals$8,700

Showing the 200 largest grantees by grant value.

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetDARCHEI DAVID FOUNDATION: $80,872 over 8y, 2.0% of budgetJEWISH COMMUNAL FUND: $55,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetMOSDOT BETH YAAKOV: $54,900 over 8y, 1.5% of budgetKEREN HAYESHIVOT TRUST: $30,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetYESHIVAT YAGDIL TORAH INC: $25,700 over 5y, 0.4% of budgetYESHIVAT SHAARE TORAH INC: $19,640 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetCHAIM MEDICAL RESOURCE INC: $18,100 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetSBH COMMUNITY SERVICE NETWORK INC: $17,380 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetTIFFERET MOSHE INC: $17,000 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetGEMAH BET YISRAEL INC: $16,500 over 4y, 0.8% of budgetDONORS FUND INC: $14,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetYESHIVAT OR HACHAIM OF LAKEWOOD INC: $14,200 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetYeshivat Lev Torah: $11,721 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetMESIVTA OF CLIFTON INC: $10,300 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetILAN HIGH SCHOOL: $9,080 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetTIFERET RABBI AKIVA: $9,050 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetBET YISRAEL: $8,700 over 4y, 3.5% of budgetAmerican Friends of Ramot Torah Schools: $8,450 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF YESHIVA DMIR INC: $8,400 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetYESHIVA TORAS CHAIM INC: $8,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetAGUDATH ISRAEL OF AMERICA: $7,522 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetCHOFETZ CHAIM HERITAGE FOUNDATION: $6,752 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetHEICHAL HATORAH: $6,700 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF ZICHRON ELIYAHU- OFAKIM INC: $6,500 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF MERCAZ HATORAH INC: $6,500 over 1y, 1.7% of budgetNETIV HALACHA INC: $6,300 over 3y, 1.3% of budgetYESHIVAT OHEL TORAH: $6,101 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetTZUR FOUNDATION INC: $5,800 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetAMUDEI CHESED INC: $5,411 over 9y, 0.9% of budgetCHEDVAS BAIS YAAKOV INC: $5,200 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetYESHIVA ZICHRON MAYIR: $4,930 over 7y, 0.3% of budgetMAIMONIDES WAY INC: $4,860 over 9y, 0.7% of budgetIMREI YOSEF: $4,600 over 2y, 2.2% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF AGUDAT SHETILE ZETIM INC: $4,400 over 3y, 1.1% of budgetSHALHEVET HATORAH INC: $4,150 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetYABIA OMER: $4,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetCOMMUNITY ASSISTANCE FUND INC: $3,800 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetA Torah Infertilty Medium Exchange: $3,539 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetTOMCHE SHABBOS OF ROCKLAND COUNTY INC: $3,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetPEF ISRAEL ENDOWMENT FUNDS INC: $3,450 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetOR HACHAYIM INC: $3,200 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF TORAT MEIR INC: $3,200 over 9y, 0.4% of budgetEMAHOT FOUNDATION INC: $3,160 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF YESHIVAT TIFRACH: $3,080 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetANIYEI YERUSHALAYIM INC: $3,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetPorat Yoseph Foundation: $3,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF YEKERAI YERUSHALAIM: $3,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetMOSDOS KEVER RACHEL IMEINU: $2,842 over 6y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds DARCHEI DAVID FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds JEWISH COMMUNAL FUND ↗
  • Who funds MOSDOT BETH YAAKOV ↗
  • Who funds KEREN HAYESHIVOT TRUST ↗
  • Who funds YESHIVAT YAGDIL TORAH INC ↗
  • Who funds YESHIVAT SHAARE TORAH INC ↗
  • Who funds CHAIM MEDICAL RESOURCE INC ↗
  • Who funds SBH COMMUNITY SERVICE NETWORK INC ↗
  • Who funds TIFFERET MOSHE INC ↗
  • Who funds GEMAH BET YISRAEL INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Jack Adjmi Family Fou…The Adjmi-Dwek Founda…The Jimmy and Berta K…The Setton FoundationThe Safdeye Brothers …The Amin and Lillian …Cabasso Family Founda…Ralph J Harary Founda…The Foop FoundationThe Howard Hoffman & …Chehebar Family Found…The Jmg Foundation
Jack Adjmi Family Foundation IncNY190.9× affinity182 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Jack Adjmi Family Foundation Inc · The Adjmi-Dwek Foundation Inc · The Jimmy and Berta Khezrie Charitable Foundation · The Setton Foundation · The Safdeye Brothers Foundation Inc · The Amin and Lillian Adjmi Foundation · Cabasso Family Foundation · Ralph J Harary Foundation Inc · The Foop Foundation · The Howard Hoffman & Sons Foundation Inc · Chehebar Family Foundation · The Jmg Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Marbeh Shalom Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Marbeh Shalom Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 230%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government →median 9%
  • Yeshivas Ohr Hatorah Inc: 28% of income from government
  • Bet Yaakov of the Jersey Shore Inc: 9% of income from government
  • Yeshivat Yagdil Torah Inc: 9% of income from government
  • Heichal Hatorah: 1% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
23get no government money at all
12report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Marbeh Shalom Foundation Inc?

Find your warmest path to Marbeh Shalom Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 804 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Marbeh Shalom’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home