Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Mar C Richards Char Found Inc Dba McR Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$270k
Granted FY2024still arriving
17
Grants FY2024still arriving
4
States reached
$70k
Largest
01What you fund
0161% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY20172024.

Human Services$205kCommunity Improvement$175kReligion$105kHousing & Shelter$45kHealth$27kEducation$18kYouth Development$14kRecreation & Sports$6kAnimals$5kOther$381k
02FY2024 · 17 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k7 grants · $34k
  • $10k–50k9 grants · $166k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $70k
$10,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$1.2M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SAMARITAN'S PURSE$70,000
GEIST CHRISTIAN CHURCH$38,000
PAWS ASSISTANCE INC$25,000
ASSISTANCE LEAGUE OF INDIANAPOLIS$25,000
HVAF OF INDIANA INC$20,000
NATIONAL KIDNEY FDN OF INDIANA$15,000
UNBREAKABLE ATHLETICS ACADEMY$12,500
SHELTERING WINGS$10,000
MARION COUNTY FIRE CHIEF$10,000
TUNNEL TO TOWERS FDN$10,000
OUTREACH INC$8,000
BAY PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH$6,000
Individual grant recipient$5,000
JOY'S HOUSE$5,000
ALZHEIMERS ASSOCIATION$5,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $205k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 78% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%PAWS ASSISTANCE INC: $12k → 10%PAWS ASSISTANCE INC: $25k → 10%PAWS ASSISTANCE INC: $6k → 10%GOLDEN PAWS ASSISTANCE DOGS: $10k → 10%PAWS ASSISTANCE INC: $5k → 10%JULIAN CENTER: $5k → 16%JULIAN CENTER: $5k → 16%STRIDES TO SUCCESS: $3k → 5%JULIAN CENTER: $5k → 16%SHELTERING WINGS: $10k → 5%JULIAN CENTER: $5k → 16%SHELTERING WINGS: $8k → 5%COBURN PLACE: $5k → 16%SHELTERING WINGS: $8k → 5%SHELTERING WINGS: $5k → 5%COBURN PLACE: $5k → 16%SHELTERING WINGS: $5k → 5%SHELTERING WINGS: $4k → 5%COBURN PLACE: $5k → 16%SHELTERING WINGS: $4k → 5%COBURN PLACE: $5k → 16%JOY'S HOUSE: $5k → 16%OUTREACH INC: $10k → 16%OUTREACH INC: $10k → 16%DOMESTIC VIOLENCE NETWORK: $5k → 16%OUTREACH INC: $8k → 16%OUTREACH INC: $5k → 16%OUTREACH INC: $5k → 16%OUTREACH INC: $5k → 16%OUTREACH INC: $5k → 16%WHEELER MISSION: $3k → 16%WHEELER MISSION: $2k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

89%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$869k · 29 repeat orgs$106k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +56% since the first grant, against +41% for the ones you funded once.

29 repeat relationships — 12 still active in FY2024, 17 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

29
18

Total granted

$869k
$69k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+56%
+41%

Still filing today

52%
56%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 86% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $38k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesHealthCommunity ImprovementYouth DevelopmentEducationReligionOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AL
    Assistance League of Indianapolis Inc
    8× · 2017–2024 · $174k · revenue +56%
  • SP
    SAMARITAN'S PURSE
    5× · 2018–2024 · $105k · revenue +163%
  • GP
    Golden PAWS Assistance Dogs Inc
    5× · 2017–2024 · $58k · revenue +176%

Funded once

  • KS
    KENDRA SPRINGS MEMORIAL FUND
    one grant, 2023 · $10k
  • B
    BENEVITY
    one grant, 2023 · $10k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2022 · $8k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Metropolitan Indianapolis Public Media Inc

Trusted journalism, inspiring stories and lifelong learning.

Arts & Culture
2
Indiana Statewide Independent Living Council Inc

To empower its peers with disabilities to lead and control their own lives.

Human Services
3
Leadership Indianapolis Inc

Educate, Inspire, Connect and Mobilize Community Leaders to serve and strengthen greater Indianapolis.

Public Benefit
4
Feeding Indiana's Hungry Inc

By drawing on varied resources within public agencies and the private sector, we hope to provide hunger relief for those in need throughout Indiana.

Human Services
5
Lifetime Housing Group Inc

Plan, coordinate and provide affordable housing to low-income individuals and families in Southeastern Indiana.

Food & Nutrition
6
Catholic Charities Terre Haute Inc

Catholic Charities Terre Haute is a comprehensive, direct services agency whose purpose is to serve the poor, the homeless, the elderly, the neglected children and the needy.

7
Indiana Philanthropy Alliance Foundation Inc

The Foundation supports the Indiana Philanthropy Alliance, Inc. and its member community foundations through special initiatives that support or expand philanthropy in Indiana.

8
Homebound Meals Inc

The Organization's mission is to assist shut-ins, usually the elderly, by delivering hot, nutritious and low-cost meals to them in their homes.

9
Indiana University Health West Hospital Inc

Lead the transformation of healthcare through quality, innovation & education, and make Indiana one of the nation's healthiest states.

Health
10
Indy Hunger Network Inc

The mission of indy hunger network is to address systemic hunger issues and eliminate disparities in the greater indianapolis hunger relief system through collaboration on programs, advocacy, and research.

Food & Nutrition
11
Glenburn Home Inc
Health
12
Meals on Wheels of Evansville Inc
Food & Nutrition

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Outreach Inc and the most unlike its peers is Samaritan's Purse. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

Your grantees are a median of 34 years old; the field is 21. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number20%0%<5yr14%3%5–10yr15%13%10–20yr14%37%20–35yr10%27%35–55yr27%20%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value20%0%<5yr14%1%5–10yr15%10%10–20yr14%27%20–35yr10%46%35–55yr27%17%55yr+

The field is 20% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 12% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/31
the rest of the field
12%
1,413/12,013

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

28 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 28 of the 52 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
28/28
Grantees still filing
23/28
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

GEIST CHRISTIAN CHURCH — $97,400 · OtherGEIST CHRISTIAN CHURCHINDIANA TAX FORCE ONE — $33,310 · OtherINDIANA TAX FORCE ONEBAY PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH — $32,800 · OtherBAY PRESBYTERIAN CHURCHUNITED SERVICE ORGANIZATIONS-TYNDALL ARMORY — $31,400 · OtherUNITED SERVICE ORGANIZATIONS-TYNDALL ARMORYALZHEIMERS ASSOCIATION — $23,500 · OtherALZHEIMERS ASSOCIATIONAMERICAN RED CROSS — $19,500 · OtherUNBREAKABLE ATHLETICS ACADEMY — $17,500 · OtherKENDRAS CALL FOR KOMFORT — $15,000 · Other+25 more — $131,070 · Other+25 moreGolden PAWS Assistance Dogs Inc — $57,800 · Human ServicesGolden PAWS Assistance …OUTREACH INC — $48,000 · Human ServicesOUTREACH INCSHELTERING WINGS CENTER FOR WOMEN INC — $42,000 · Human ServicesSHELTERING WINGS CENTER…COBURN PLACE SAFEHAVEN II INC — $20,000 · Human ServicesCOBURN PLACE SAFEHAVEN …THE JULIAN CENTER INC — $20,000 · Human ServicesTHE JULIAN CENTER INC+4 more — $17,000 · Human Services+4 moreAssistance League of Indianapolis Inc — $174,175 · Community ImprovementAssistance League of…+1 more — $1,000 · Community ImprovementSAMARITAN'S PURSE — $104,500 · ReligionSAMARITAN'S …HVAF OF INDIANA INC — $45,000 · Housing & ShelterNational Kidney Foundation Of Indiana Inc — $15,000 · HealthTARA TREATMENT CENTER INC — $6,000 · HealthFAIR HAVEN FOUNDATION INC — $5,000 · Health+1 more — $500 · HealthSTEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION — $15,000 · EducationIndiana University Foundation — $2,500 · Education
Other$401,480Human Services$204,800Community Improvement$175,175Religion$104,500Housing & Shelter$45,000Health$26,500Education$17,500

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetAssistance League of Indianapolis Inc — $174,175 over 8y, 4.6% of budgetSAMARITAN'S PURSE — $104,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetGolden PAWS Assistance Dogs Inc — $57,800 over 5y, 0.8% of budgetOUTREACH INC — $48,000 over 7y, 0.6% of budgetHVAF OF INDIANA INC — $45,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetSHELTERING WINGS CENTER FOR WOMEN INC — $42,000 over 7y, 0.3% of budgetCOBURN PLACE SAFEHAVEN II INC — $20,000 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetTHE JULIAN CENTER INC — $20,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetNational Kidney Foundation Of Indiana Inc — $15,000 over 1y, 1.9% of budgetSTEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION — $15,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetThe Hendricks County Child Advocacy Center Inc — $7,500 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetINDIANA CENTER FOR PREVENTION OF YOUTH ABUSE AND SUICIDE — $6,500 over 2y, 1.3% of budgetU Foundation — $6,000 over 1y, 11% of budgetTARA TREATMENT CENTER INC — $6,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetHumane Society for Hamilton County — $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetThe Way Station — $5,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetFAIR HAVEN FOUNDATION INC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetTMP Enterprises Inc — $5,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetDOMESTIC VIOLENCE NETWORK OF GREATER INDIANAPOLIS INC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetWHEELER MISSION MINISTRIES INC — $4,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMIAMI COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIETYINC — $3,000 over 2y, 1.4% of budgetIndiana University Foundation — $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSTRIDES TO SUCCESS INC — $2,500 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetGLEANERS FOOD BANK OF INDIANA INC — $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetREDISCOVER DOWNTOWN PERU INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetEskenazi Health Foundation Inc — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetINDIANA HISTORICAL SOCIETY — $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Assistance League of Indianapolis Inc
  • Who funds SAMARITAN'S PURSE
  • Who funds Golden PAWS Assistance Dogs Inc
  • Who funds OUTREACH INC
  • Who funds HVAF OF INDIANA INC
  • Who funds SHELTERING WINGS CENTER FOR WOMEN INC
  • Who funds COBURN PLACE SAFEHAVEN II INC
  • Who funds THE JULIAN CENTER INC
  • Who funds National Kidney Foundation Of Indiana Inc
  • Who funds STEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION
  • Who funds The Hendricks County Child Advocacy Center Inc
  • Who funds INDIANA CENTER FOR PREVENTION OF YOUTH ABUSE AND SUICIDE
  • Who funds U Foundation
  • Who funds TARA TREATMENT CENTER INC
  • Who funds Humane Society for Hamilton County
  • Who funds The Way Station
  • Who funds FAIR HAVEN FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds TMP Enterprises Inc
  • Who funds DOMESTIC VIOLENCE NETWORK OF GREATER INDIANAPOLIS INC
  • Who funds WHEELER MISSION MINISTRIES INC
  • Who funds MIAMI COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIETYINC

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Central Indiana Community Foundation IncIN34.9× affinity15 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Central Indiana Community Foundation Inc · Lilly Endowment Inc · Nicholas H Noyes Jr Memorial Foundation · The Indianapolis Foundation Inc · United Way of Central Indiana Inc · The Brave Heart Foundation Inc · Hamilton County Community Foundation Inc · Samerian Foundation Inc · Nina Mason Pulliam Charitable Trust · Lumina Foundation for Education Inc · Pacers Foundation Inc · Maurer Family Foundation Inc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Mar C Richards Char Found Inc Dba McR Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 10%1%4%8%15%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    9report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 52 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph