Skip to content
Manhattan Fund - Caroline F Peine Charitable at a glance

· Private foundation

Manhattan Fund - Caroline F Peine Charitable

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$444k
Granted FY2025still arriving
15
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$140k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Human Services$652kHealth$533kEducation$319kFood & Nutrition$206kHousing & Shelter$201kYouth Development$171kArts & Culture$154kReligion$140kOther$0
02FY2025 · 15 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k7 grants · $37k
  • $10k–50k5 grants · $139k
  • $50k–250k3 grants · $267k
$10,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$9.0M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
PAWNEE MENTAL HEALTH SERVICES INC$139,860
BIG LAKES DEVELOPMENT CENTER INC$65,000
MANHATTAN AREA TECHNICAL COLLEGE$62,500
BE ABLE INC$46,667
FLINT HILLS BREADBASKET INC$46,667
COMMON TABLE$21,000
CRISIS CENTER INC$15,000
TRUE COLORS FLINT HILLS INC$10,000
KANSAS STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION$8,000
Individual grant recipient$7,500
GOOD SHEPHERD HOMECARE & HOSPICE$5,000
SPECIAL OLYMPICS KANSAS INC$5,000
KANSAS STATE UNIVERSITY$5,000
GREATER MANHATTAN COMMUNITY FOUNDATION$5,000
GREATER MANHATTAN COMMUNITY FOUNDATION$1,404
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–25, $293k) land where the poverty rate runs at 20%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%HOMECARE & HOSPICE INC: $10k → 20%HOMECARE AND HOSPICE INC: $10k → 20%GOOD SHEPHERD HOMECARE & HOSPICE: $5k → 20%BIG LAKES DEVELOPMENT CENTER INC: $65k → 20%BIG LAKES DEVELOPMENT CENTER INC: $50k → 20%BIG LAKES DEVELOPMENT CENTER INC: $50k → 20%BIG LAKES DEVELOPMENTAL CENTER INC: $25k → 20%BIG LAKES DEVELOPMENTAL CENTER INC: $25k → 20%BIG LAKES DEVELOPMENTAL CENTER INC: $25k → 20%NORTH CENTRAL FLINT HILLS AREA AGENCY: $20k → 20%THRIVE FLINT HILLS FOUNDATION: $8k → 20%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

86%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$2.1M · 26 repeat orgs$352k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +47% since the first grant, against +29% for those funded once.

26 repeat relationships: 11 still active in FY2025, 15 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

26
25

Total granted

$2.1M
$323k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+47%
+29%

Still filing today

77%
64%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 93% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $29k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesArts & CulturePhilanthropyRecreation & SportsHousing & ShelterFood & NutritionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CC
    CRISIS CENTER INC
    5× · 2020–2025 · $460k · revenue +47%
  • BL
    BIG LAKES DEVELOPMENTAL CENTER INC
    6× · 2020–2025 · $240k · revenue +28%
  • PM
    PAWNEE MENTAL HEALTH SERVICES INC
    5× · 2020–2025 · $205k · revenue +60%

Funded once

  • MP
    MANHATTAN-OGDEN PUBLIC SCHOOLS FOUNDATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $55k · revenue +51%
  • WH
    WAREHAM HALL INC
    one grant, 2023 · $50k
  • WH
    WAREHAM HALL RENOVATION FUND
    one grant, 2024 · $50k · revenue 0%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Kansas Healthcare Collaborative Inc

Engaging and aligning providers and stakeholders to establish Kansas as a role model for health care quality and a top performer in health care outcomes.

Health
2
Housing Services of Kansas City Inc

The Housing Services of Kansas City, Inc is focused on creating and preserving affordable housing for low income kansas city residents.

Housing & Shelter
3
Kansas Affordable Housing Corporation

Provide support for mennonite housing rehabilitation services, inc., which provides low-income housing for the elderly and disabled through hud housing programs that provide low-income families with ownership opportunities and the…

Housing & Shelter
4
Kanza Mental Health and Guidance Center Inc

Offer hope to build a better tomorrow through mental health services.

Health
5
Homestead Affordable Housing Inc

Homestead affordable housing, inc. mission is to develop affordable housing and help rural kansas communities achieve sustainable development.

Housing & Shelter
6
The Bert Nash Community Mental Health Center Inc

To advance the health of the douglas county community through comprehensive behavioral health services responsive to evolving needs and changing environments.

Health
7
Community Health Center of Se Kansas Inc

To provide quality, affordable, accessible medical, dental and behavioral health care to anyone regardless of ability to pay.

Health
8
Wichita Habitat for Humanity Inc

At wichita habitat for humanity, we believe everyone deserves the strength, stability, and independence that comes with a safe, affordable home. we partner with hardworking individuals and families in our community, empowering them to…

Housing & Shelter
9
Family Service and Guidance Center of Topeka Inc

Family service and guidance center provides quality behavioral healthcare to children and families. vision: family service and guidance center shall be the premier, outcomes-focused children and family behavioral healthcare center that…

Health
10
Safehouse Crisis Center Inc

To provide shelter and advocacy services to victims of domestic violence, sexual assault, and stalking in the 11 counties of southeast kansas.

Human Services
11
Kansas Masonic Home

The kansas masonic home's mission is to provide loving care in a comfortable and safe environment. we strive to address with dignity, the mental, physical, and spiritual health of those we serve.

Human Services
12
Kansas Legal Services Inc

Kansas legal services is devoted to helping low income kansans meet their basic needs through the provision of important legal and mediation services.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Greater Manhattan Community Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Manhattan Area Housing Partnership Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

38 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 38 of the 54 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
11
Early backer (in before they grew)
38/38
Grantees still filing
23/38
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CRISIS CENTER INC: $460,000 · OtherCRISIS CENTER INCPAWNEE MENTAL HEALTH SERVICES INC: $204,640 · OtherPAWNEE MENTAL HEALTH SERVICES INCMANHATTAN AREA TECHNICAL COLLEGE: $197,500 · OtherMANHATTAN AREA TECHNICAL COLLEGEHABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF THE NORTHERN FLINT HILLS INC: $137,500 · OtherHABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF THE NORTHERN FLINT HILLS INCBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF MANHATTAN INC: $94,500 · OtherBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF MANHATTAN INCMANHATTAN-OGDEN PUBLIC SCHOOLS FOUNDATION: $55,000 · Other+28 more: $401,630 · Other+28 moreBIG LAKES DEVELOPMENTAL CENTER INC: $240,000 · Human ServicesBIG LAKES DEVELOP…SHEPHERD'S CROSSING: $105,000 · Human ServicesSHEPHERD'S CROSSI…GOOD SHEPHERD HOMECARE & HOSPICE INC: $25,000 · Human ServicesGOOD SHEPHERD HOM…NORTH CENTRAL-FLINT HILLS AREA AGENCY ON AGING INC: $20,000 · Human Services+1 more: $7,500 · Human ServicesFLINTHILLS BREADBASKET INC: $131,667 · Food & NutritionCOMMON TABLE INC: $21,000 · Food & NutritionBE ABLE INC: $136,220 · ReligionWAREHAM HALL RENOVATION FUND: $50,000 · PhilanthropyGREATER MANHATTAN COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $42,822 · PhilanthropyNO STONE UNTURNED FOUNDATION INC: $25,000 · Philanthropy+2 more: $3,970 · PhilanthropyWAREHAM HALL INC: $50,000 · Arts & CultureManhattan Arts Center Inc: $23,000 · Arts & CultureFLINT HILLS DISCOVERY CENTER FOUNDATION: $15,000 · Arts & CultureKansas State Historical Society Inc: $8,750 · Arts & CultureRILEY COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIETY: $7,250 · Arts & CultureTrue Colors Flint Hills Inc: $50,250 · Youth DevelopmentGIRL SCOUTS OF NE KANSAS AND NW MISSOURI INC: $3,000 · Youth Development
Other$1,550,770Human Services$397,500Food & Nutrition$152,667Religion$136,220Philanthropy$121,792Arts & Culture$104,000Youth Development$53,250

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCRISIS CENTER INC: $460,000 over 5y, 8.0% of budgetBIG LAKES DEVELOPMENTAL CENTER INC: $240,000 over 6y, 0.5% of budgetPAWNEE MENTAL HEALTH SERVICES INC: $204,640 over 5y, 0.5% of budgetHABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF THE NORTHERN FLINT HILLS INC: $137,500 over 5y, 7.6% of budgetBE ABLE INC: $136,220 over 4y, 8.1% of budgetFLINTHILLS BREADBASKET INC: $131,667 over 3y, 4.0% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF MANHATTAN INC: $94,500 over 4y, 2.5% of budgetTrue Colors Flint Hills Inc: $50,250 over 4y, 18% of budgetWAREHAM HALL RENOVATION FUND: $50,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetGREATER MANHATTAN COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $42,822 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetSPECIAL OLYMPICS KANSAS INC: $37,500 over 6y, 0.4% of budgetMORNING STAR INC: $36,500 over 2y, 13% of budgetKANSAS STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $36,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetHousing and Credit Counseling Inc: $34,376 over 5y, 1.9% of budgetRILEY COUNTY HUMANE SOCIETY INC: $30,000 over 1y, 23% of budgetGOOD SHEPHERD HOMECARE & HOSPICE INC: $25,000 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetNO STONE UNTURNED FOUNDATION INC: $25,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetMANHATTAN EMERGENCY SHELTER INC: $24,000 over 2y, 1.3% of budgetManhattan Arts Center Inc: $23,000 over 2y, 2.6% of budgetNORTH CENTRAL-FLINT HILLS AREA AGENCY ON AGING INC: $20,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetKANSAS BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS INC: $16,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetFLINT HILLS DISCOVERY CENTER FOUNDATION: $15,000 over 2y, 2.1% of budgetUNIVERSITY FOR MAN INCORPORATED: $9,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetKansas State Historical Society Inc: $8,750 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetTHRIVE FLINT HILLS FOUNDATION: $7,500 over 1y, 8.9% of budgetRILEY COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIETY: $7,250 over 1y, 3.7% of budgetCatholic Charities of Northern Kansas Inc: $5,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetSUNFLOWER CHILDREN'S COLLECTIVE INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetMANHATTAN AREA HOUSING PARTNERSHIP INC: $3,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetGIRL SCOUTS OF NE KANSAS AND NW MISSOURI INC: $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGOOD SHEPHERD FOUNDATION: $2,970 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetROAD RUNNERS CLUB OF AMERICA INC: $1,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSERVICEMEMBER AGRICULTURAL VOCATION EDUCATION CORP: $1,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetMANHATTAN COMMUNITY HEALTH FOUNDATION: $1,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Greater Manhattan Com…Commerce Bancshares F…Memorial Hospital Ass…Konza United Way IncThe Bill & Erma Riley…The Weary Family Foun…Blue Cross and Blue S…Topeka Community Foun…Robert E and Patricia…Bnsf Railway Foundati…The Sunderland Founda…Greater Salina Commun…
Greater Manhattan Community FoundationKS58.4× affinity26 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Greater Manhattan Community Foundation · Commerce Bancshares Foundation · Memorial Hospital Association Inc · Konza United Way Inc · The Bill & Erma Riley Family Foundation · The Weary Family Foundation · Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Kansas Foundation Inc · Topeka Community Foundation · Robert E and Patricia Schmidt Foundation · Bnsf Railway Foundation · The Sunderland Foundation · Greater Salina Community Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Manhattan Fund - Caroline F Peine Charitable funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Manhattan Fund - Caroline F Peine Charitable. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    18report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 54 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Manhattan Fund - Caroline F Peine’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home