· Private foundation
Magen Ezra Foundation
Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What it funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2021 to 2024.
Where the money goes
Grants by size, and the largest recipients.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| Individual grant recipient | $4,600 |
| MAGEN DAVID YESHIVAH | $2,500 |
| TORAT HANACHAL | $613 |
| RAV CHESED | $509 |
| Individual grant recipient | $500 |
| AMERICAN FRIENDS OF SULAM INC | $500 |
| Individual grant recipient | $500 |
| YESHIVA KOL YAACOV | $377 |
| Individual grant recipient | $360 |
| JERUSALEM CTR FOR RESEARCH | $360 |
| YESHIVA SHAREI EZRA | $360 |
| Individual grant recipient | $360 |
| Individual grant recipient | $333 |
| BAIS CHUNA | $333 |
| DR HAMIZAACH & TIFERET SHELOMO | $301 |
Does the money reach high-need areas?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.
Its human-services grants (FY21–24, $2k) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
How this is measured
Which US states its grants reach
How this is measured
Who it funds again
Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.
Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +22% since the first grant, against +11% for those funded once.
89 repeat relationships: 48 still active in FY2024, 41 since wound down; 32 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 46% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $11k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
How this is measured
Backed again, and grew
- BOBETH OLOTH3× · 2021–2023 · $720 · revenue +18%
- ZAZICHRON AMIEL INC4× · 2021–2024 · $692 · revenue +101%
- MWMAIMONIDES WAY INC3× · 2021–2023 · $656 · revenue +31%
Funded once
- IGIndividual grant recipientone grant, 2023 · $7k
- IGIndividual grant recipientone grant, 2021 · $3k
- OAO A E PINSK KARLIN INCgraduatedone grant, 2023 · $2k · revenue +165%
How this is measured
Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
Closest unfunded matches
The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Provide financial assistance to needy individuals, and to religious, educational, and charitable organizations in us and abroad.
Education and religious activities and research
How this is measured
36 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.
Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.
How this is measured
Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 36 of the 227 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.
Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee
Showing the 200 largest grantees by grant value.
Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding
A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
Co-funders
Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Jimmy and Berta Khezrie Charitable Foundation · Jack Adjmi Family Foundation Inc · The Adjmi-Dwek Foundation Inc · Jewish Communal Fund · Ralph J Harary Foundation Inc · Marbeh Shalom Foundation Inc · Chehebar Family Foundation · The Ralph S Gindi Family Foundation · The Howard Hoffman & Sons Foundation Inc · The Amin and Lillian Adjmi Foundation · The Setton Foundation · The Maj Franco Family Charitable Foundation
How this is measured
How much its grantees rely on government
Each dot is one organization Magen Ezra Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Magen Ezra Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.
- Yeshiva Keter Torah Inc: 8% of income from government
How this is measured
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Magen Ezra Foundation?
Find your warmest path to Magen Ezra Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.
Play a game based on Magen Ezra’s filings →