Skip to content
Magee Family Charitable Trust at a glance

· Private foundation

Magee Family Charitable Trust

$18k
Granted FY2017
27
Grants FY2017
9
States reached
$3k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01FY2017 · 27 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$500
Median grant
9
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CRU-Campus Crusade Family Life$2,790
No Heart Left Behind Foundation$1,700
David and the Giants Mission Fund I$1,500
Trinity Church EFCA$1,000
The Mission Foundation$1,000
First Baptist Church$1,000
Alliance Defending Freedom$800
Grace Chapel EFCA Inc$600
Southeast Louisiana Legal Services$500
Kingdom Financial Education$500
Council on Aging St Tammany$500
St Tammany Humane Society$500
LA Coalition Against Human Traffick$500
Bethel Baptist Church$500
Liferesource Ministries Inc$500
02The need
02

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–17, $2k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%No Heart Left Behind Foundation: $2k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MN
VA
AZ
NC
DC
LA
MS
GA
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Bowlin Ministries Nc

Evangelist

Religion
2
Destiny Ministries

Religious missionary

Religion
3
Search for the Truth Ministries

The organization's primary purpose is to share the reality of creation and the reliability of the bible through lectures, books, and audio/visual resources.

Religion
4
Grace Evangelistic Ministries Inc

Grace evangelistic ministries, inc. conducts crusades and conferences in various countries to evangelize the lost and present them with an accurate interpretation of the gospel. for those who decide to believe, we help them form bible…

Religion
5
Onepassion Ministries Inc

To provide resources that will encourage a christian life and to train pastors and church leaders in biblical preaching

Religion
6
Apostolic Global Missions Inc

Evangelistic ministry

Religion
7
Bible Related Ministries

To minister Gods Word to churches and individuals.

Religion
8
Sammy Tippit Ministries
Religion
9
At His Feet Ministry Inc

Evangelistic ministry

Human Services
10
Hearts Set Free International Inc

Hearts Set Free International Ministries recognizes that many people today (as in Jesus day) are living in bondage to sin and satan. We are committed to working with Jesus to liberate them (LK 4:18-19). Our desire is to see all of those we…

Religion
11
Mission Mississippi

To encourage and demonstrate grace in the body of christ across racial lines, so that communities throughout mississippi can see practical evidence of the gospel message.

Civil Rights
12
Awakening Ministries of Louisiana Inc

Evangelistic ministry

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Grace Adventures Inc; the most unlike its peers is St Tammany Humane Society D/B/a Northshore Humane Society. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
03the grantee network

12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 27 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/12
Grantees still filing
8/12
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CRU-Campus Crusade Family Life: $2,790 · OtherCRU-Campus Crusade Family LifeTrinity Church EFCA: $1,000 · OtherTrinity Church EFCAFirst Baptist Church: $1,000 · OtherFirst Baptist ChurchGrace Chapel EFCA Inc: $600 · OtherGrace Chapel EFCA IncBethel Baptist Church: $500 · OtherAGAPE MINISTRIES DANIELLE INN: $500 · OtherCarpe Diem Foundation: $500 · OtherTHE EVANGELICAL FREE CHURCH OF AMERICA: $500 · OtherCouncil on Aging St Tammany: $500 · OtherLiferesource Ministries Inc: $500 · OtherLA Coalition Against Human Traffick: $500 · OtherKINGDOM FINANCIAL EDUCATION: $500 · Other+5 more: $1,350 · Other+5 moreDAVID AND THE GIANTS MISSION FUND: $1,500 · ReligionDAVID AND THE GIANTS…THE MISSION FOUNDATION INC: $1,000 · ReligionTHE MISSION FOUNDATI…IN TOUCH MINISTRIES INC: $500 · ReligionIN TOUCH MINISTRIES …GRACE ADVENTURES INC: $250 · ReligionGRACE ADVENTURES INCNO HEART LEFT BEHIND FOUNDATION: $1,700 · Human ServicesNO HEART L…ALLIANCE DEFENDING FREEDOM: $800 · Civil RightsSOUTHEAST LOUISIANA LEGAL SERVICES CORP: $500 · Crime & LegalST TAMMANY HUMANE SOCIETY D/B/A NORTHSHORE HUMANE SOCIETY: $500 · AnimalsTHE HERITAGE FOUNDATION: $500 · Public BenefitUPWARD COMMUNITY SERVICES: $400 · Health
Other$10,740Religion$3,250Human Services$1,700Civil Rights$800Crime & Legal$500Animals$500Public Benefit$500Health$400

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetNO HEART LEFT BEHIND FOUNDATION: $1,700 over 1y, 1.6% of budgetDAVID AND THE GIANTS MISSION FUND: $1,500 over 1y, 3.6% of budgetTHE MISSION FOUNDATION INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetALLIANCE DEFENDING FREEDOM: $800 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAGAPE MINISTRIES DANIELLE INN: $500 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetSOUTHEAST LOUISIANA LEGAL SERVICES CORP: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetIN TOUCH MINISTRIES INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetST TAMMANY HUMANE SOCIETY D/B/A NORTHSHORE HUMANE SOCIETY: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE HERITAGE FOUNDATION: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetKINGDOM FINANCIAL EDUCATION: $500 over 1y, 2.7% of budgetUPWARD COMMUNITY SERVICES: $400 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetGRACE ADVENTURES INC: $250 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift FundMA3.5× affinity4 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Magee Family Charitable Trust funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Magee Family Charitable Trust. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 27 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2017, released 2017. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2020) is on record but names no grant recipient in the published copy, so the figures above are from FY2017, the most recent year this funder’s grantee list reached the public record.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Magee Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home