Skip to content

· Private foundation

Madeline Murray & Bertha Tranah Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$43k
Granted FY2025still arriving
13
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2025.

Health$89kPhilanthropy$61kHuman Services$48kAnimals$20kYouth Development$20kCrime & Legal$14kPublic Safety & Disaster$14kReligion$7k
02FY2025 · 13 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$3,225
Median grant
3
States reached
$716k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
UNITED WAY OF THE BAY AREA$9,675
GUNILDA RIANDA SENIOR CENTER ASSOC$4,300
THE SALVATION ARMY A CALIFORNIA CORP$3,225
AMERICAN HEART ASSOCIATION$3,225
AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC$3,225
HUMANE SOCIETY OF NAPA COUNTY$3,225
BOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF ST HELENA$3,225
ST HELENA HOSPITAL$3,225
HOSPICE OF NAPA VALLEY$2,150
SHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDREN$2,150
ST HELENA POLICE DEPARTMENT$2,150
ST HELENA VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPT$2,150
ST HELENA CATHOLIC CHURCH$1,075
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–25, $27k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%GUNILDA RIANDA SENIOR CENTER ASSOC: $4k → 9%GUNILDA RIANDA SENIOR CENTER ASSOC: $4k → 9%GUNILDA RIANDA SENIOR CENTER ASSOC: $4k → 9%GUNILDA RIANDA SENIOR CENTER ASSOC: $4k → 9%GUNILDA RIANDA SENIOR CENTER ASSOC: $4k → 9%GUNILDA RIANDA SENIOR CENTER ASSOC: $4k → 9%GUNILDA RIANDA SENIOR CENTER ASSOC: $4k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

100%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$211k · 14 repeat orgs$0 to everyone else

14 repeat relationships: 12 still active in FY2025, 2 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

14
0

Total granted

$211k
$0

Still filing today

50%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthHuman ServicesAnimalsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • GR
    Gunilda Rianda Senior Center Association Rianda House Senior Activity Center
    7× · 2019–2025 · $27k · revenue +224%
  • HS
    Humane Society of Napa County & SPCA INC
    7× · 2019–2025 · $20k · revenue +49%
  • SH
    St Helena Hospital
    7× · 2019–2025 · $20k · revenue +29%

Funded once

    How this is measured

    Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

    04Its field

    Closest unfunded matches

    The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

    1
    Sutter Bay Hospitals

    MISSION STATEMENT: MISSION: CARING FOR OUR PATIENTS FIRST AND OUR PEOPLE ALWAYS. VISION: TO BE THE MOST COMPREHENSIVE, INTEGRATED AND CONNECTED HEALTH SYSTEM FOR GETTING AND STAYING WELL. VALUES: EXCELLENCE - We deliver high-quality,…

    Health
    2
    Scripps Health

    Founded in 1924 by philanthropist Ellen Browning Scripps, Scripps Health is a $4.9 billion, private not-for-profit integrated health system in San Diego, Ca. (see Sch O)

    Health
    3
    Pasadena Hospital Association Ltd

    Huntington Health stands for community. We stand for compassion. But more than anything, Huntington stands for health. Providing world-class health care is our specialty, and it's what we've been doing for the San Gabriel Valley since…

    Health
    4
    Ukiah Adventist Hospital

    Living God's love by inspiring health, wholeness and hope.

    —
    5
    Adventist Health Mendocino Coast

    Living God's love by inspiring health, wholeness and hope.

    —
    6
    Sutter Valley Hospitals

    MISSION STATEMENT: MISSION: CARING FOR OUR PATIENTS FIRST AND OUR PEOPLE ALWAYS. VISION: TO BE THE MOST COMPREHENSIVE, INTEGRATED AND CONNECTED HEALTH SYSTEM FOR GETTING AND STAYING WELL. VALUES: EXCELLENCE - We deliver high-quality,…

    Health
    7
    Adventist Health SystemWest

    Living God's love by inspiring health, wholeness and hope.

    Health
    8
    St Vincent Hospital of the Hospital Sisters of the Third Order of St Franci s

    To continue christ's healing love through delivery of competent & compassionate healthcare in an environment sensitive to the needs of all people. the hospital is committed to providing a broad range of quality inpatient and outpatient…

    Health
    9
    Adventist Health Clearlake Hospital Inc

    Living God's love by inspiring health, wholeness and hope.

    Health
    10
    Sutter Bay Medical Foundation

    Mission statement: mission: caring for our patients first and our people always. vision: to be the most comprehensive, integrated and connected health system for getting and staying well. values: excellence - we deliver high-quality,…

    Health
    11
    John Muir Health

    The mission of john muir is to improve the health of the communities we serve with quality and compassion.

    Health
    12
    Saint Agnes Medical Center

    We, saint agnes medical center and trinity health, serve together in the spirit of the gospel as a compassionate and transforming healing presence within our communities. saint agnes medical center is a member of trinity health.

    Health
    How this is measured
    The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is St Helena Hospital; the most unlike its peers is American Heart Association Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
    04the grantee network

    8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

    Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

    How this is measured

    Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 15 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

    Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

    0
    Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
    1
    Early backer (in before they grew)
    8/8
    Grantees still filing
    5/8
    Grew since first funded

    Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

    BOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF ST HELENA: $20,436 · OtherBOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF ST HELENAST HELENA VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT: $13,624 · OtherST HELENA VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENTST HELENA POLICE DEPARTMENT: $13,624 · OtherST HELENA POLICE DEPARTMENTHOSPICE OF NAPA VALLEY: $13,624 · OtherHOSPICE OF NAPA VALLEYTHE SALVATION ARMY: $10,800 · OtherTHE SALVATION ARMYTHE SALVATION ARMY A CALIFORNIA CORP: $9,636 · OtherTHE SALVATION ARMY A CALIFORNIA CORPAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC: $7,875 · OtherAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INCST HELENA CATHOLIC CHURCH: $6,593 · OtherST HELENA CATHOLIC CHURCHSt Helena Hospital: $20,436 · HealthSt Helena HospitalAmerican Heart Association Inc: $20,436 · HealthAmerican Heart Association …SHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDREN: $13,624 · HealthSHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHIL…AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC: $12,561 · HealthAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INCUNITED WAY OF THE BAY AREA: $61,308 · PhilanthropyUNITED WAY OF THE BAY ARE…Gunilda Rianda Senior Center Association Rianda House Senior Activity Center: $27,248 · Human ServicesGunilda Ria…Humane Society of Napa County & SPCA INC: $20,436 · Animals
    Other$96,212Health$67,057Philanthropy$61,308Human Services$27,248Animals$20,436

    Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

    25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetUNITED WAY OF THE BAY AREA: $61,308 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetGunilda Rianda Senior Center Association Rianda House Senior Activity Center: $27,248 over 7y, 0.7% of budgetHumane Society of Napa County & SPCA INC: $20,436 over 7y, 0.4% of budgetSt Helena Hospital: $20,436 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc: $20,436 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetST HELENA VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT: $13,624 over 7y, 1.2% of budgetSHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDREN: $13,624 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC: $12,561 over 4y, 0.0% of budget
    Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

    A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

    • Who funds UNITED WAY OF THE BAY AREA ↗
    • Who funds Gunilda Rianda Senior Center Association Rianda House Senior Activity Center ↗
    • Who funds Humane Society of Napa County & SPCA INC ↗
    • Who funds St Helena Hospital ↗
    • Who funds American Heart Association Inc ↗
    • Who funds ST HELENA VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT ↗
    • Who funds SHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDREN ↗
    • Who funds AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC ↗

    How much its grantees rely on government

    Each dot is one organization Madeline Murray & Bertha Tranah Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Madeline Murray & Bertha Tranah Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

    2024
    ’20’21’22’23’24’25
    no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
    • Shriners Hospitals for Children: 0% of income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 15 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Madeline Murray & Bertha Tranah’s filings →

    More from the funding graph