Skip to content

· Public charity

Mad Anthony Childrens Foundation

Mad Anthonys is a philanthropic organization recognizing, connecting, and fundraising with community leaders through two primary events, Red Coat Gala and Pro-Am Tournament and provides semi-annual granting to various community charities.

$70k
Granted FY2025still arriving
4
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$35k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Health$702kYouth Development$67kRecreation & Sports$42kHuman Services$22kEducation$10kInternational$10k
02FY2025 · 4 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$15,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$113k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Crew Life Inc$35,000
Hopes Harbor$15,000
Police Athletic League$10,000
World Baseball Academy$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY23–24, $22k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 7%YMCA of Greater Fort Wayne: $12k → 12%St Vincent de Paul Society: $10k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

90%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$767k · 3 repeat orgs$87k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +2% since the first grant, against -4% for those funded once.

3 repeat relationships: 2 still active in FY2025, 1 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

3
4

Total granted

$767k
$42k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+2%
-4%

Still filing today

100%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 36% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $45k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’21’22’23’24’25
Youth DevelopmentHuman ServicesHealthRecreation & SportsEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CH
    CHILDREN'S HOPE INC
    8× · 2017–2025 · $702k · revenue -4%
  • WB
    WORLD BASEBALL ACADEMY INC
    3× · 2023–2025 · $42k · revenue +24%
  • BG
    BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF NORTHEAST IND
    2× · 2023–2024 · $22k · revenue +2%

Funded once

  • MY
    METROPOLITAN YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF GREATER FORT WAYNE
    one grant, 2024 · $12k · revenue +8%
  • FW
    FORT WAYNE SOCIETY OF ST VINCENT DEPAUL INC
    one grant, 2023 · $10k · revenue -4%
  • ST
    SPECIALTY TUTORING INC
    one grant, 2023 · $10k · revenue -43%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Watertown Boys and Girls' Club Inc

To inspire and enable all young people, especially those that need us most, to realize their full potential as productive, responsible and caring citizens.

Youth Development
2
Boys and Girls Clubs of N Cent Nc

To inspire and enable all young people, especially those who need it most, to realize their full potential and to be productive, responsible, and caring citizens.

Youth Development
3
Little League Baseball Inc

Little League Inc. is a non-profit youth organization in New York City.

Recreation & Sports
4
Young Men's Christian Association of Southeast Texas

To put christian principles into practice through programs that build healthy spirit, mind, and body for all.

Human Services
5
Boys and Girls Clubs of the Emerald Coast Inc

Boys and girls clubs of the emerald coast inc is a not-for-profit corporation organized under the laws of the state of florida as of june 13, 1967 for the purpose of promoting health, social,

—
6
Cleveland County Family Young Men's Christian Association Inc

The mission of the ymca is to put christian principles into practice through programs that build healthy spirit, mind and body for all. the y mission is also to advance our cause of strengthening community through youth development,…

—
7
Sw Michigan Miracle League

Our mission is to provide opportunities for kids, regardless of their abilities, to compete and experience the joy and benefits that come from playing sports.

Recreation & Sports
8
The Boys & Girls Clubs Inc

To inspire and enable all young people, especially those most in need of our services, to realize and develop their full potential as productive, responsible and caring citizens in a global society.

—
9
Family Ymca Association

Providing recreational activities without regard to race, religion, or socio-economic status

Human Services
10
Boys & Girls Club of Northwest Colo

The mission of the clubs is to enable and inspire the youth of our area to reach their full potential as productive, responsible and caring citizens. the clubs offers core programs designed to engage youth with peers and caring adults to…

Youth Development
11
The Boys and Girls Clubs of Metropolitan Baltimore

To inspire and enable all young people, especially those who need us most, to realize their full potential as productive, responsible and caring citizens

Youth Development
12
Summit Area Young Men's Christian Association a Nj Nonprofit Corporation

The mission of the summit area ymca is to strengthen the foundations of community by nurturing and developing the potential of every child, promoting healthy living and fostering a sense of social responsibility in the community.

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Metropolitan Young Men's Christian Association of Greater Fort Wayne; the most unlike its peers is Specialty Tutoring Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
3/9
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CHILDREN'S HOPE INC: $702,200 · HealthCHILDREN'S HOPE INCCREW LIFE INC: $35,000 · Youth DevelopmentCREW LIFE …BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF NORTHEAST IND: $22,450 · Youth DevelopmentBOYS & GIR…POLICE ATHLETIC LEAGUE OF FORT WAYN: $10,000 · Youth DevelopmentPOLICE ATH…COVENANT COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORP: $10,000 · Youth DevelopmentCOVENANT C…WORLD BASEBALL ACADEMY INC: $42,400 · Recreation & SportsMETROPOLITAN YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF GREATER FORT WAYNE: $12,450 · Human ServicesFORT WAYNE SOCIETY OF ST VINCENT DEPAUL INC: $10,000 · Human ServicesSPECIALTY TUTORING INC: $10,000 · Education
Health$702,200Youth Development$77,450Recreation & Sports$42,400Human Services$22,450Education$10,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCHILDREN'S HOPE INC: $702,200 over 8y, 15% of budgetWORLD BASEBALL ACADEMY INC: $42,400 over 3y, 1.2% of budgetCREW LIFE INC: $35,000 over 1y, 22% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF NORTHEAST IND: $22,450 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetMETROPOLITAN YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF GREATER FORT WAYNE: $12,450 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFORT WAYNE SOCIETY OF ST VINCENT DEPAUL INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetPOLICE ATHLETIC LEAGUE OF FORT WAYN: $10,000 over 1y, 4.8% of budgetSPECIALTY TUTORING INC: $10,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetCOVENANT COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORP: $10,000 over 1y, 1.7% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Community Foundation of Greater Fort Wayne IncIN19.9× affinity7 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Community Foundation of Greater Fort Wayne Inc · English-Bonter-Mitchell Fdn · Sledd Fdn Discretionary · McMillen Foundation Inc · Edward M Wilson Foundation · The Waterfield Foundation Inc · Dr Louis a and Anne B Schneider Fdn · Florence M & Paul M Staehle Fdn · Zollner Foundation · Howard P Arnold Foundation Inc · M E Raker Foundation Inc · Surack Family Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Mad Anthony Childrens Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Mad Anthony Childrens Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%2%6%14%25%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 9 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Mad Anthony Childrens’ filings →

    More from the funding graph