· Private foundation
Mac and Pat Parker Family Foundation Inc
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What it funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.
Where the money goes
Grants by size, and the largest recipients.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| SOUTHMINSTER PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH | $2,000 |
| GLOBAL HEALTH MEDIA PROJECT | $2,000 |
| ZONTA FOOTHILLS FOUNDATION | $1,000 |
| THERE WITH CARE | $1,000 |
| PLIGRIM LUTHERAN CHURCH | $1,000 |
| THE NATIONAL FRAGILE X FOUNDATION | $500 |
| KUNC | $417 |
| DOCTOR'S WITHOUT BOARDERS | $416 |
| GARRETT'S SPACE | $400 |
| MAD RIVER VALLEY INTERFAITH COUNCIL | $333 |
| OREGON PUBLIC BROADCASTING | $333 |
| EVERYONE'S CHILD | $300 |
| PARTNERS IN HEALTH | $300 |
Does the money reach high-need areas?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.
Its human-services grants (FY20–25, $5k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 93% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
How this is measured
Which US states its grants reach
How this is measured
Who it funds again
Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.
Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +53% since the first grant, against +10% for those funded once.
40 repeat relationships: 5 still active in FY2025, 35 since wound down; 8 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 40% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $6k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
How this is measured
Backed again, and grew
- RWRIDE WITH FAITH INC2× · 2022–2023 · $8k · revenue +22%
- M2MATTHEW 25 INC4× · 2020–2023 · $4k · revenue +96%
DePauw University3× · 2021–2023 · $4k · revenue +38%
Funded once
- FPFIRST PRESBYTERIAN CHURCHone grant, 2023 · $5k
- HPHEADWATERS PARK ALLIANCE INCone grant, 2024 · $5k · revenue 0%
- HCHUNTINGTON COUNTY COMM FDNone grant, 2024 · $5k
How this is measured
Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
Closest unfunded matches
The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Partnering to improve quality of life as a nonprofit organization dedicated to mental health and wellness. healing is our purpose, help is our promise, health is our passion.
United Food Bank unites communities to alleviate hunger.
The union of concerned scientists puts rigorous, independent science into action, developing solutions and advocating for a healthy, safe, and just future.
The food bank for central & northeast missouri is a regional disaster and hunger relief network that acquires and distributes millions of meals each year to help neighbors get the food they need to thrive. (continued on schedule o)the…
Mission: together we advance the quality of life for people with disabilities. vision: people of all abilities thrive in the world. values: impact- generate solutions that make a difference. choice - create opportunities for people to lead…
To provide food to all in need through community partnerships and hunger relief programs. Our vision is a hunger-free Larimer County.
Engage actively and continuously in medical research, education and training in the practice of medicine in conjunction with the department of family medicine of the indiana university school of medicine and indiana university…
Food bank of the rockies ignites the power of community to nourish people facing food insecurity.
See schedule ouniversity corporation for atmospheric research (ucar), on behalf of, and in cooperation with its member university members, is engaged in the management of long-term atmospheric and related research and educational…
The fsmb serves as the voice for state medical boards, supporting them through education, assessment, research and advocacy while providing services and initiatives that promote patient safety, quality health care and regulatory best…
Our mission is to solve hunger in central pennsylvania by ensuring that everyone struggling with hunger has access to enough wholesome food every day. we will achieve this bold goal with the help of our generous donors, volunteers and…
The minnesota business partnership's mission is to maintain a high quality of life for all minnesotans by ensuring that the state's economy remains strong, globally competitive and its prospects for growth bright by working with elected…
How this is measured
42 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.
How this is measured
Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 42 of the 89 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.
Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee
Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding
A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds RIDE WITH FAITH INC ↗
- Who funds HEADWATERS PARK ALLIANCE INC ↗
- Who funds MATTHEW 25 INC ↗
- Who funds DePauw University ↗
- Who funds VOICES FOR CHILDREN INC ↗
- Who funds THERE WITH CARE ↗
- Who funds OREGON FOOD BANK ↗
- Who funds Questa Education Foundation Inc ↗
- Who funds OUTSIDE IN ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN RIVERS INC ↗
- Who funds MEALS ON WHEELS PEOPLE INC ↗
- Who funds OREGON HUMANE SOCIETY ↗
- Who funds FORT WAYNE MUSEUM OF ART INC ↗
- Who funds PARTNERS IN HEALTH A NONPROFIT CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF NORTHEAST IND ↗
- Who funds Everyones Child Inc ↗
- Who funds Heartland Sings Inc ↗
- Who funds National Coalition for the Homeless ↗
- Who funds BLOOD CANCER UNITED INC ↗
- Who funds URBAN HOMESTEADING ASSISTANCE (U-HAB) INC ↗
Co-funders
Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: English-Bonter-Mitchell Fdn · The James Foundation Inc · Edward D & Ione Auer Foundation Monarch Capital David Meyer Trustee · Dr Louis a and Anne B Schneider Fdn · Aws Foundation Inc · Community Foundation of Greater Fort Wayne Inc · Isa S & Elizabeth Canavati Family Foundation · Howard P Arnold Foundation Inc · Edward M Wilson Foundation · The Waterfield Foundation Inc · Colorado Gives Foundation · Magee-O'Connor Foundation Inc I/C/O Mr Douglas E Miller
How this is measured
How much its grantees rely on government
Each dot is one organization Mac and Pat Parker Family Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Mac and Pat Parker Family Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.
- Outside in: 33% of income from government
- Oregon Food Bank: 21% of income from government
- Oregon Public Broadcasting: 1% of income from government
- Partners in Health a Nonprofit Corporation: 0% of income from government
How this is measured
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Mac and Pat Parker Family Foundation Inc?
Find your warmest path to Mac and Pat Parker Family Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.
Play a game based on Mac and Pat Parker Family’s filings →