Skip to content

· Public charity

Lynx Foundation

Mobilizing the power of community and the resources of philanthropy to advance equity for people, places and the planet.

$715k
Granted FY2021
8
Grants FY2021
4
States reached
$130k
Largest

Read this first · the figures below need context

79% of Lynx Foundation’s FY2023 grant dollars went to Marin Community Foundation, not to grantees.

Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2023 names 2 organizations directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it. Everything below is therefore FY2021, the last year Lynx Foundation named its own grantees at scale: 8 organizations, $530k. It is dated, not current.

Organizations named directly on the return

2
’17
4
’18
2
’19
2
’20
8
’21
3
’22
2
’23

Amber years are those where most dollars went to a sponsor.

01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2023.

Crime & Legal$1.4MPhilanthropy$333kCivil Rights$200kFood & Nutrition$100kInternational$100kEducation$75k
02FY2021 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 8 grants below total $530,000, the rows itemized in this filing. The $714,793 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $184,793 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2021

  • $10k–50k1 grant · $25k
  • $50k–250k7 grants · $505k
$50,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$18M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
BRADY CENTER TO PREVENT GUN VIOLENCE$130,000
GIFFORDS LAW CENTER TO PREVENT GUN VIOLENCE$100,000
SANDY HOOK PROMISE FOUNDATION$75,000
UNITED NATIONS FOUNDATION$50,000
TARRANT AREA FOOD BANK$50,000
UNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF$50,000
NORTH TEXAS FOOD BANK$50,000
10000 DEGREES$25,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–23) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 81% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%10000 Degrees: $20k → 8%GIFFORDS LAW CENTER TO PREVENT GUN VIOLENCE: $100k → 10%NORTH TEXAS FOOD BANK: $50k → 5%TARRANT AREA FOOD BANK: $50k → 11%BRADY CENTER TO PREVENT GUN VIOLENCE: $130k → 14%SANDY HOOK PROMISE FOUNDATION: $225k → 9%10000 DEGREES: $15k → 8%LEGAL COMMUNITY AGAINST VIOLENCE: $100k → 10%BRADY CENTER TO PREVENT GUN VIOLENCE: $130k → 14%SANDY HOOK PROMISE FOUNDATION: $75k → 9%10000 DEGREES: $15k → 8%GIFFORDS LAW CENTER TO PREVENT GUN VIOLENCE: $100k → 10%BRADY CENTER TO PREVENT GUN VIOLENCE: $120k → 14%SANDY HOOK PROMISE FOUNDATION: $75k → 9%MARIN COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $333k → 8%LEGAL COMMUNITY AGAINST VIOLENCE: $100k → 10%BRADY CENTER TO PREVENT GUN VIOLENCE: $120k → 14%SANDY HOOK PROMISE FOUNDATION: $75k → 9%LEGAL COMMUNITY AGAINST VIOLENCE: $100k → 10%BRADY CENTER TO PREVENT GUN VIOLENCE: $100k → 14%Legal Community Against Violence: $90k → 10%UNITED NATIONS FOUNDATION: $50k → 14%UNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF: $50k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 36% of Lynx Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address. By recipient address, 47% of the giving stays in CA; by stated purpose, 73%.

Lynx Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

90%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.7M · 5 repeat orgs$200k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +95% since the first grant, against +12% for those funded once.

5 repeat relationships: 4 still active in FY2021, 1 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2021 (too recent to call). Read against FY2021, the last year this funder named its own grantees directly; its giving has since run through a sponsor, which reports no donor behind each grant.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

5
4

Total granted

$1.7M
$200k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+95%
+12%

Still filing today

80%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2023, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23
Crime & LegalInternationalEducationCivil RightsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • BC
    BRADY CENTER TO PREVENT GUN VIOLENCE
    5× · 2018–2022 · $600k · revenue +88%
  • SANDY HOOK PROMISE FOUNDATION
    4× · 2018–2023 · $450k · revenue +124%
  • GIFFORDS LAW CENTER TO PREVENT GUN VIOLENCE
    2× · 2021–2022 · $200k · revenue +95%

Funded once

  • UNITED NATIONS FOUNDATION INC
    one grant, 2021 · $50k · revenue -11%
  • UNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEFgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $50k · revenue +64%
  • TA
    Tarrant Area Food Bank
    one grant, 2021 · $50k · revenue +9%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
San Francisco Food Bank

To end hunger in san francisco and marin counties by soliciting food donations nationally, distributing this food to qualifying public service agencies and neighborhood pantries, advocating for improved government food programs, and…

—
2
We Are Family Foundation

The we are family foundation celebrates the vision of a global family by creating and supporting programs that inspire and educate people about mutual respect, understanding and appreciation of cultural diversity.

Civil Rights
3
Sustainable Fisheries Partnership Foundation

To engage and catalyze global seafood supply chains in rebuilding depleted fish stocks and reducing the environmental impacts of fishing and fish farming.

Animals
4
Institute for Agriculture & Trade Policy

Iatp works locally and globally at the intersection of policy and practice to ensure fair and sustainable food, farm and trade systems.

Food & Nutrition
5
The Barbara Bush Foundation for Family Literacy Inc

Committed to helping families and communities nationwide build brighter futures through literacy

Arts & Culture
6
Global Alliance for Improved Nutrition

The mission of the global alliance for improved nutrition (gain) is to improve the consumption of healthier diets for all, especially the most vulnerable, by improving the availability, affordability, desirability, and sustainability of…

Food & Nutrition
7
Council On Foreign Relations Inc

The council on foreign relations (cfr) is an independent, nonpartisan membership organization, think tank, and publisher dedicated to being a resource for its members, government officials, business executives, journalists, educators and…

International
8
The Maryland Food Bank Inc

The maryland food bank is a nonprofit hunger-relief organization dedicated to feeding people, strengthening communities, and ending hunger for more marylanders.

—
9
Project Drawdown

Project drawdown's mission is to drive meaningful climate action by advancing science-based solutions and strategies. project drawdown's work is focused on three pillars: science - advancing science-based climate solutions and strategies;…

Education
10
Global Ties Us

Global ties u.s. (global ties) powers individuals, communities, and nations to build trust and advance peace and prosperity through international exchange.

International
11
World Wildlife Fund Inc

Wwf's mission is to conserve nature and reduce the most pressing threats to the diversity of life on earth. (continued on schedule o)

Environment
12
Federation for American Immigration Reform

The federation for american immigration reform's (fair) mission is to educate the public about the economic, sociological, environmental, demographic and other effects of mass immigration to the united states.

International
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Marin Community Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Legal Community Against Violence dba Law Cntr to Prevent Gun Violence. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/10
Grantees still filing
8/10
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

BRADY CENTER TO PREVENT GUN VIOLENCE: $600,000 · Crime & LegalBRADY CENTER TO PREVENT GUN VIOLENCESANDY HOOK PROMISE FOUNDATION: $450,000 · Crime & LegalSANDY HOOK PROMISE FOUNDATIONLEGAL COMMUNITY AGAINST VIOLENCE dba LAW CNTR TO PREVENT GUN VIOLENCE: $390,000 · OtherLEGAL COMMUNITY AGAINST …Tarrant Area Food Bank: $50,000 · OtherTarrant Area Food BankNORTH TEXAS FOOD BANK: $50,000 · OtherNORTH TEXAS FOOD BANKMARIN COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $333,333 · PhilanthropyMARIN COMMUNITY …GIFFORDS LAW CENTER TO PREVENT GUN VIOLENCE: $200,000 · Civil RightsGIFFORDS L…UNITED NATIONS FOUNDATION INC: $50,000 · InternationalUNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF: $50,000 · International10000 DEGREES: $75,000 · Education
Crime & Legal$1,050,000Other$490,000Philanthropy$333,333Civil Rights$200,000International$100,000Education$75,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetBRADY CENTER TO PREVENT GUN VIOLENCE: $600,000 over 5y, 1.5% of budgetSANDY HOOK PROMISE FOUNDATION: $450,000 over 4y, 1.7% of budgetLEGAL COMMUNITY AGAINST VIOLENCE dba LAW CNTR TO PREVENT GUN VIOLENCE: $390,000 over 4y, 90% of budgetMARIN COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $333,333 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetGIFFORDS LAW CENTER TO PREVENT GUN VIOLENCE: $200,000 over 2y, 1.7% of budget10000 DEGREES: $75,000 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetUNITED NATIONS FOUNDATION INC: $50,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetUNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF: $50,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTarrant Area Food Bank: $50,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNORTH TEXAS FOOD BANK: $50,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Lynx Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Lynx Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Sandy Hook Promise Foundation: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Lynx Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Lynx Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 10 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2021, released 2021. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2025) is on record and reports no grant expense, so the figures above are from FY2021, the most recent year this funder made grants.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Lynx’s filings →

More from the funding graph