Skip to content
LykesKnapp Family Fund at a glance

· Private foundation

LykesKnapp Family Fund

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$213k
Granted FY2025still arriving
18
Grants FY2025still arriving
8
States reached
$50k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
0198% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Environment$268kReligion$191kRecreation & Sports$133kYouth Development$131kArts & Culture$122kEducation$114kHealth$40kFood & Nutrition$38kOther$0
02FY2025 · 18 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k8 grants · $39k
  • $10k–50k9 grants · $125k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $50k
$10,000
Median grant
8
States reached
$2.3M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
WASATCH ACADEMY$50,000
CAMP CHIPPEWA FOUNDATION$30,000
PIEDMONT LAND CONSERVANCY$17,000
CHRIST CHURCH CATHEDRAL$15,000
YELLOWSTONE FOREVER$12,500
STRAKE JESUIT COLLEGE PREP$10,000
JOHN FAIREY GARDEN CONSERVATION$10,000
GALVESTON BAY FOUNDATION$10,000
HOUSTON SYMPHONY$10,000
MEMORIAL PARK CONSERVANCY$10,000
CONTEMPORARY ARTS MUSEUM HOUSTON$7,500
SEATTLE CHILDREN'S THEATER$7,500
A SEATTLE CHURCH$5,000
HOUSTON PARKS BOARD$5,000
CENTER FOR WOODEN BOATS$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–20, $7k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%FRIENDS OF THE WORLD FOOD PROGRAM: $4k → 14%CHRISTIAN COMMUNITY SERVICE CENTER: $2k → 16%Friends of The World Food Program: $2k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
MT
MN
MA
CA
UT
CO
MO
KY
VA
NM
AR
NC
DC
LA
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

80%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$862k · 29 repeat orgs$218k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +33% since the first grant, against +20% for those funded once.

29 repeat relationships: 10 still active in FY2025, 19 since wound down; 8 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

29
32

Total granted

$862k
$122k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+33%
+20%

Still filing today

72%
59%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 55% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $96k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EnvironmentArts & CultureHealthEducationYouth DevelopmentHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CC
    Camp Chippewa Foundation
    9× · 2017–2025 · $114k · revenue +43%
  • MP
    Memorial Park Conservancy Inc
    6× · 2017–2025 · $92k · revenue +138%
  • YF
    YELLOWSTONE FOREVER
    3× · 2023–2025 · $53k · revenue +99%

Funded once

  • BB
    Buffalo Bayou Partnership Incgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $12k · revenue +257%
  • SA
    ST AUGUSTINE OF HIPPO EPISCOPAL CHURCH
    one grant, 2024 · $10k
  • CP
    CHINQUAPIN PREPARATORY SCHOOL
    one grant, 2023 · $10k · revenue -3%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Houston Audubon Society

To advance the conservation of birds and their habitats in the Greater Houston Gulf Coast region by acquiring and maintaining critical habitat as bird sanctuaries, providing education programs and nature experiences, and advocating policy…

Environment
2
Houston Museum of Natural Science

The mission of the Houston Museum of Natural Science shall be to preserve and advance the general knowledge of natural science; to enhance in individuals the knowledge of and delight in natural science and related subjects; and to maintain…

Arts & Culture
3
The Houston Parks Board Foundation

The Houston Parks Board Foundation provides the Houston Parks Board with financial assistance to support operations and park projects.

Environment
4
Coastal Prairie Conservancy

The Coastal Prairie Conservancy (CPC) works to sustain a resilient Texas by preserving coastal prairies, wetlands, farms, and ranches to benefit people and wildlife forever. Continued on Schedule OCPC conserves land, restores and enhances…

Environment
5
Trinity Park Conservancy

Trinity Park Conservancy champions the transformation of the Trinity River to become the heart of Dallas. With the community, the Conservancy will design public spaces that unite us, enrich people's lives through access to nature, create…

Community Improvement
6
Balboa Park Conservancy

Balboa Park Conservancy (the Conservancy) was organized on November 3, 1923. The Conservancy is the City of San Diegos (the City) partner and advocated for the greater good of Balboa Park (the Park). The Conservancy collaborated with and…

—
7
Bexar Land Trust Inc dba Green Spaces Alliance of South Texas

The mission of Bexar Land Trust (Green Spaces) is to sustain the natural environment and enhance urban spaces through land conservation, community engagement, and education.

Environment
8
Houston Freedmen's Town Conservancy Inc

To completely restore Houston Freedmen's Town as a heritage district that provides America with its only Freedmen's Town.

Community Improvement
9
Bayou Land Conservancy

To preserve land along streams for flood control, clean water, and wildlife in the geographical area that drains into lake houston.

Environment
10
Glasstire

Glasstire is a website about visual art in Texas. Our mission is to expand the conversation about visual art in Texas.

Arts & Culture
11
Willow Waterhole Greenspace Conservancy

The Willow Waterhole Greenspace Conservancy ("Willow Waterhole") serves as the leading advocate for public greenspace improvements and nature preservation at the 291-acre Willow Waterhole Greenway. (See Schedule O)Willow Waterhole partners…

Environment
12
The Heritage Society

The Heritage Society (THS) is a nonprofit organization founded in 1954 whose mission is to tell the stories of the diverse history of Houston and Texas through collections, exhibits, the arts, educational programs, film, video, and other…

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Cultural Landscape Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Blackwood Educational Land Institute. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

45 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 45 of the 69 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
45/45
Grantees still filing
27/45
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Christ Church Cathedral Endowment Fund: $95,000 · OtherChrist Church Cathedral Endowment FundTHE BRYAN MUSEUM: $41,000 · OtherTHE BRYAN MUSEUMPECKERWOOD GARDEN FOUNDATION: $32,000 · OtherPECKERWOOD GARDEN FOUNDATIONCHRIST CHURCH CATHEDRAL: $30,500 · OtherCHRIST CHURCH CATHEDRALSt John's Episcopal Church: $25,000 · OtherSt John's Episcopal ChurchJOHN FAIREY GARDEN CONSERVATION: $23,000 · OtherJOHN FAIREY GARDEN CONSERVATIONPRO-VISION INC: $15,000 · Other+30 more: $143,996 · Other+30 moreMemorial Park Conservancy Inc: $92,000 · EnvironmentMemorial Park Conservancy IncYELLOWSTONE FOREVER: $52,500 · EnvironmentYELLOWSTONE FOREVERGalveston Bay Foundation Inc: $50,000 · EnvironmentGalveston Bay Foundation IncWESTERN LANDOWNERS ALLIANCE: $41,000 · EnvironmentWESTERN LANDOWNERS ALLIANCEPIEDMONT LAND CONSERVANCY: $22,000 · EnvironmentPIEDMONT LAND CONSERVANCYHermann Park Conservancy: $21,500 · EnvironmentHermann Park ConservancyBuffalo Bayou Partnership Inc: $12,000 · EnvironmentRiver Oaks Garden Club: $11,500 · Environment+7 more: $29,000 · Environment+7 moreCamp Chippewa Foundation: $113,725 · Youth DevelopmentCamp Chippew…+1 more: $2,500 · Youth DevelopmentWASATCH ACADEMY: $50,000 · EducationTRANSYLVANIA UNIVERSITY: $27,000 · EducationFRIENDS OF UTAH AVALANCHE FORE CAST CENTER INC: $5,000 · EducationGLENWOOD CEMETERY HISTORIC PRESERVATION FOUNDATION: $30,000 · Arts & CultureTHE MUSEUM OF FINE ARTS HOUSTON: $12,500 · Arts & CultureHouston Symphony Society: $10,000 · Arts & CultureContemporary Arts Museum Houston: $7,500 · Arts & CultureTheatre Under the Stars Inc: $3,000 · Arts & CultureTHE CULTURAL LANDSCAPE FOUNDATION: $2,500 · Arts & Culture+1 more: $1,250 · Arts & CultureA Way Out Inc: $25,000 · HealthTHE MENNINGER CLINIC: $9,000 · HealthPLANNED PARENTHOOD OF GREATER TEXAS INC: $5,500 · HealthTHE BEACON OF DOWNTOWN HOUSTON: $1,500 · HealthHouston Parks Board: $37,500 · Philanthropy
Other$405,496Environment$331,500Youth Development$116,225Education$82,000Arts & Culture$66,750Health$41,000Philanthropy$37,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCamp Chippewa Foundation: $113,725 over 9y, 2.9% of budgetMemorial Park Conservancy Inc: $92,000 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetYELLOWSTONE FOREVER: $52,500 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetWASATCH ACADEMY: $50,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetGalveston Bay Foundation Inc: $50,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetWESTERN LANDOWNERS ALLIANCE: $41,000 over 3y, 1.4% of budgetHouston Parks Board: $37,500 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetGLENWOOD CEMETERY HISTORIC PRESERVATION FOUNDATION: $30,000 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetTRANSYLVANIA UNIVERSITY: $27,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetA Way Out Inc: $25,000 over 2y, 2.4% of budgetPIEDMONT LAND CONSERVANCY: $22,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetHermann Park Conservancy: $21,500 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetPRO-VISION INC: $15,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetTHE MUSEUM OF FINE ARTS HOUSTON: $12,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBuffalo Bayou Partnership Inc: $12,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetRiver Oaks Garden Club: $11,500 over 3y, 0.7% of budgetTrees For Houston: $10,100 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetCHINQUAPIN PREPARATORY SCHOOL: $10,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetHouston Symphony Society: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetArmand Bayou Nature Center Foundation Attention Anne Bike: $10,000 over 1y, 3.8% of budgetTHE MENNINGER CLINIC: $9,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetFRIENDS OF ALTA INC: $8,000 over 2y, 2.5% of budgetContemporary Arts Museum Houston: $7,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetAmerican Sustainable Business Council: $7,500 over 2y, 2.0% of budgetFRIENDS OF THE WORLD FOOD PROGRAM INC: $5,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetPLANNED PARENTHOOD OF GREATER TEXAS INC: $5,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetHouston Botanic Garden: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetFRIENDS OF UTAH AVALANCHE FORE CAST CENTER INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetChristian Community Service Center Inc: $4,550 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetTHE SAN JUAN PRESERVATION TRUST: $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetYes ministries: $3,000 over 1y, 3.3% of budgetTheatre Under the Stars Inc: $3,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTAOS LAND TRUST: $3,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetFRIENDS OF THE PUBLIC GARDEN INC: $3,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetAmerican Sustainable Business Institute Inc: $2,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE CULTURAL LANDSCAPE FOUNDATION: $2,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE TRUST FOR PUBLIC LAND: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBLACKWOOD EDUCATIONAL LAND INSTITUTE: $2,500 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetTHE BEACON OF DOWNTOWN HOUSTON: $1,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetINTERNATIONAL CAMPAIGN FOR TIBET: $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSCENIC TEXAS: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Greater Houston Commu…The Brown Foundation …The Elkins FoundationAlbert & Ethel Herzst…Vivian L Smith Founda…Strake FoundationAlvin & Lucy Owsley F…John P McGovern Found…Houston Endowment IncThe Prioleau Family F…Shell USA Company Fou…MD Anderson Foundation
Greater Houston Community FoundationTX31.9× affinity18 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Greater Houston Community Foundation · The Brown Foundation Inc · The Elkins Foundation · Albert & Ethel Herzstein Charitable Foundation · Vivian L Smith Foundation · Strake Foundation · Alvin & Lucy Owsley Foundation · John P McGovern Foundation · Houston Endowment Inc · The Prioleau Family Foundation · Shell USA Company Foundation · MD Anderson Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization LykesKnapp Family Fund funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from LykesKnapp Family Fund. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government →median 1%
  • Friends of the Public Garden Inc: 1% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
13report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to LykesKnapp Family Fund?

Find your warmest path to LykesKnapp Family Fund through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 69 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on LykesKnapp Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home